AI Consensus Fit Review

MobileHelp for Seniors living alone: AI Consensus Fit Review

MobileHelp is a good fit for Seniors living alone, particularly those who need both in-home and on-the-go protection.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
MobileHelp for Seniors living alone: AI Consensus Fit Review hero image
medical-alert-systemsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

MobileHelp is a good fit for Seniors living alone, particularly those who need both in-home and on-the-go protection. Five of seven AI platforms named MobileHelp during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 3.8 and a best rank of 2. The strongest reason to consider MobileHelp is its Duo system, which combines a home base unit with a GPS-enabled mobile device, addressing the central need for coverage both inside and outside the home. The main limitation is inconsistent public information: pricing varies across sources, fall detection costs extra, and there is unresolved conflict over whether two-person Duo/Solo bundles remain available. Buyers should obtain a written quote and verify contract terms before purchasing.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage5 of 7 platforms
Share of included platform responses71.4%
Average listed rank3.8
Best listed rank2 (Perplexity)
Relevant product/model/planMobileHelp Duo (home + mobile); MobileHelp Elite (mobile-only)
Overall use-case fitGood (2 strong, 3 good, 1 mixed, 1 uncertain)
Research date2026-07-27

Why MobileHelp Qualified for This Study

MobileHelp qualified because it offers multiple product tiers relevant to seniors living alone, including home-based systems, mobile GPS devices, and combined bundles. The company's product lineup spans the Classic (in-home cellular), Elite (mobile GPS), Solo (mobile), and Duo (home-plus-mobile bundle) [1]. This range directly addresses the two core scenarios for a senior living alone: protection at home and protection while away. MobileHelp also markets optional fall detection, caregiver tools, and 24/7 U.S.-based monitoring, all of which were evaluation criteria for this study [4].

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Seniors living alone

The MobileHelp Duo is the most relevant product for a senior living alone who needs comprehensive coverage. MobileHelp describes Duo as a system that provides emergency assistance both at home and on the go through a cellular base station and a mobile device [6]. The MobileHelp Elite is the most relevant mobile-only alternative, described as using AT&T's nationwide 4G LTE network with GPS/Wi-Fi-assisted location and two-way communication [7]. The MobileHelp Fall Button is the optional fall-detection add-on compatible with Duo, Classic, and Solo [8].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Mobile coverage and GPS are a core strength (Strong agreement)

Four platforms with verifiable data highlighted MobileHelp's mobile GPS capabilities as an advantage. The Elite device runs on AT&T 4G LTE and combines GPS with Wi-Fi location tracking, one-touch SOS, and two-way calling [9]. Independent reviews confirm that mobile options use AT&T cellular connectivity paired with GPS and Wi-Fi tracking to route responders to the user's location when away from home [11]. This is particularly valuable for a senior living alone who may need help while running errands, walking, or traveling.

Fall detection is optional and costs extra (Strong agreement)

All platforms with pricing data agreed that fall detection is an add-on, not included in base plans. Reported costs range from $10 to $11 per month [11]. MobileHelp explicitly warns that its Fall Button does not detect 100% of falls and is not intended to replace a caregiver [16]. Fall detection is not available on the landline-based Wired Home/Classic Landline option [9].

No long-term contract is advertised (Majority agreement)

Four platforms reported that MobileHelp operates on a month-to-month, contract-free basis [11]. Independent reviews describe the ability to cancel at any time by returning leased equipment [20]. However, this conflicts with MobileHelp's own published terms, which state a three-month minimum commitment [21]. This conflict is detailed in the Pricing section below.

24/7 U.S.-based monitoring is a stated feature (Majority agreement)

MobileHelp states that its systems connect users to a U.S.-based 24/7 monitoring center with two-way communication [22]. Independent reviews describe UL-certified response centers with trained agents [24]. One independent test measured an average emergency response time of about 26 seconds, slower than some competitors tested at 8-16 seconds, though calls connected reliably and agents were rated professional [25].

Caregiver tools exist but have limits (Majority agreement)

MobileHelp Connect provides system, emergency, and non-emergency alerts, caregiver access, and location services. The standard plan includes 30 location requests per month, with additional packages at $6 per 30 requests [26]. However, independent reviewers describe the companion app as less robust than some competitors' caregiver apps [28].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Product availability: Duo and Solo bundles (Majority conflict)

The most significant disagreement concerns whether two-person bundles remain available. Multiple 2026 independent reviews report that MobileHelp discontinued Solo, Mobile Duo, and Home Duo bundles, with Elite becoming the main mobile option [29]. However, MobileHelp's own website continues to list Duo and Solo product pages [30]. This unresolved conflict directly affects buyers seeking spouse or two-user coverage. The current public materials do not clearly establish whether Duo, Solo, Elite, or a newer product is the standard recommendation [33].

Pricing consistency (Majority conflict)

Reported starting prices vary noticeably across sources. In-home systems are reported anywhere from $19.95 to $29.95 per month depending on the source and promotion [34]. Mobile GPS plans range from $24.95 to $41.95 per month [34]. MobileHelp's own homepage lists Elite from $37.95 per month and Home from $29.95 per month [37], while a promotional page lists Duo at $443.40 per year ($36.95/month), Solo at $395.40 per year ($32.95/month), and Classic at $359.40 per year ($29.95/month) [37]. These discrepancies make it difficult to determine the true current price without a written quote.

Contract terms (Majority conflict)

MobileHelp marketing pages advertise no long-term contracts and a risk-free 30-day trial [38]. However, the published Terms and Conditions state a three-month minimum commitment, a restocking fee of up to $50, and a $350 charge if equipment is not returned within 30 days after termination [38]. The return policy states that cancellation requires contacting MobileHelp and that returned equipment must be received before service cancellation for non-purchased equipment [40]. One source mentioned the trial period may have been shortened to 10 days, though this is likely outdated [41].

Battery life (Mixed agreement)

Battery life claims vary by source and device. MobileHelp states Elite battery life can last up to six days in standard mode, with variability based on usage and conditions [42]. Independent reviews report base stations offer roughly 30 hours of backup power, help button batteries last about five years, and mobile device batteries last approximately 24-36 hours depending on the source [44]. One source notes the mobile unit may require daily charging [45].

Fit rating (Mixed)

Platform fit ratings ranged from "strong" (Google, Grok) to "good" (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek) to "mixed" (Perplexity) to "uncertain" (Kimi, which could not verify details due to failed retrieval). This spread reflects both genuine strengths and the difficulty of confirming current terms.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Fall Detection

MobileHelp offers optional automatic fall detection as an add-on across most devices, typically priced around $10-$11 per month [46]. The Fall Button is compatible with Duo, Classic, and Solo [49]. MobileHelp states it can automatically send an alert when a fall is detected, but explicitly warns it does not detect 100% of falls [50]. Fall detection is not available on the landline-based system [51].

Mobile Coverage and GPS

The Elite mobile device runs on AT&T 4G LTE and combines GPS with Wi-Fi location tracking, one-touch SOS, two-way calling, water resistance, and hourly heartbeat signals [51]. Coverage depends on AT&T network availability in the user's area [54]. This is a meaningful advantage for a senior living alone who leaves home regularly.

Response Center

MobileHelp states its systems connect users to a U.S.-based 24/7 monitoring center with two-way communication [55]. Operators can contact emergency contacts or emergency services according to account setup [56]. Independent reviews describe UL-certified response centers [57]. One independent test measured an average response time of 26 seconds, slower than some competitors [58].

Caregiver Tools

MobileHelp Connect provides system, emergency, and non-emergency alerts, caregiver access, and location services. The standard plan includes 30 location requests per month; additional packages are $6 per 30 requests [59]. The current FAQ describes care-circle management, chat, tasks, reminders, and activity information, though availability may depend on the system and accessories [61]. Independent reviewers describe the app as less robust than some competitors' caregiver apps [62].

Battery Life

MobileHelp states Elite battery life can last up to six days in standard mode, with variability based on settings, cellular signal, environmental conditions, and peripheral-button use [61]. Independent reviews report base stations offer roughly 30 hours of backup power and help button batteries last about five years [64]. Mobile device batteries are reported at approximately 24-36 hours depending on the source [64].

Spouse Coverage

Public information is unclear. MobileHelp promotional material references a Mobile Duo option for two users on the go, but exact current availability, equipment configuration, and price are unclear [65]. Multiple 2026 independent reviews report that MobileHelp discontinued its two-user Solo, Mobile Duo, and Home Duo bundles, while MobileHelp's own website continues to list Duo and Solo product pages [66]. NCOA reports discounted bundles for two-person households [68].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Pricing confidence is low due to conflicting public information. The table below summarizes reported costs from company and independent sources.

ItemReported PriceSource Type
Classic (in-home)$19.95-$29.95/monthMixed
Elite (mobile GPS)$37.95-$41.95/monthMixed
Duo (home + mobile)$36.95-$44.95/monthMixed
Solo (mobile)$24.95-$32.95/monthMixed
Fall Detection add-on$10-$11/monthMixed
MobileHelp Connect extra location requests$6 per 30 requestsCompany
Optional protection/warranty plan~$6.99/monthIndependent
Optional OnGuard Alerts~$2.99/monthIndependent
Optional lockbox~$2.99/monthIndependent

MobileHelp's current official homepage lists Elite from $37.95 per month and Home from $29.95 per month [69]. A promotional page lists Duo at $443.40 per year, Solo at $395.40 per year, and Classic at $359.40 per year [69]. Independent sources report in-home plans starting around $25.95-$29.95 per month and mobile GPS plans around $35.95-$41.95 per month [70].

Contract terms are conflicting. MobileHelp marketing pages advertise no long-term contracts and a risk-free 30-day trial [73]. However, the published Terms and Conditions state a three-month minimum commitment, a restocking fee of up to $50, and a $350 charge if equipment is not returned within 30 days after termination [73]. The return policy states that cancellation requires contacting MobileHelp and that returned equipment must be received before service cancellation for non-purchased equipment [75]. Some sources mention shipping fees on monthly billing plans and optional lockbox fees on certain tiers [76].

Best Suited For

MobileHelp is best suited for:

  • Seniors living alone who regularly leave home and need mobile GPS coverage as well as in-home protection [78]
  • Families who want a U.S.-based 24/7 monitoring center and caregiver-facing alerts or location tools [80]
  • Buyers who prefer cellular service without requiring a landline [82]
  • Budget-conscious seniors who want low-cost in-home coverage without long-term contracts [83]
  • Adult children who want month-to-month flexibility with no cancellation penalty beyond returning leased equipment [84]

Probably Not Best Suited For

MobileHelp is probably not best suited for:

  • Buyers seeking a clearly published, all-inclusive monthly price with minimal promotional conditions [85]
  • Seniors who may forget to charge a mobile device or keep it with them outside the home [87]
  • Households needing guaranteed fall detection, since MobileHelp states that its fall detector does not detect every fall [89]
  • Seniors living in remote areas with poor AT&T cellular coverage [90]
  • Buyers who want the fastest emergency response times, since one independent test measured 26 seconds versus 8-16 seconds for some competitors [92]
  • Buyers wanting a smartwatch-style discreet device, since MobileHelp's mobile lineup leans toward clip-on/pendant form factors [93]
  • Buyers who need a robust, feature-rich caregiver app, since testers described MobileHelp's app as less advanced than some rivals [93]

When Another Option May Be Better

Consider another provider when:

  • The buyer requires a single transparent monthly price with no annual-plan or promotional qualification [94]
  • Independently verified fall-detection performance or a different device design is the primary buying criterion [96]
  • The senior rarely leaves home and does not need GPS mobility; a simpler home-only system may be less expensive [97]
  • The senior is unlikely to remember daily charging or carrying the device [99]
  • AT&T cellular coverage is weak or non-existent at the senior's home and usual locations [101]
  • Free fall detection is required, since some competitors include it as standard on certain plans [98]
  • Unlimited free spouse monitoring is prioritized [103]
  • The buyer needs confirmed two-person/spousal bundle pricing today, given current uncertainty about MobileHelp's Duo/Solo availability [104]

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. What is the exact monthly and annual price for Duo or Elite, including fall detection, taxes, shipping, activation, replacement, and equipment charges? [105]
  2. Does the quoted plan require annual prepayment or impose a minimum three-month commitment? [106]
  3. Which cellular network and coverage map apply at the senior's home, neighborhood, travel destinations, and usual outdoor locations? [107]
  4. What is the expected battery life in the senior's actual usage pattern, and what happens when the battery is low? [108]
  5. Does the selected system include a pendant or wrist button, and can the senior use it while the mobile unit is charging? [109]
  6. How many caregiver contacts can be added, what alerts are included without extra fees, and are location requests capped? [110]
  7. Is fall detection available for the exact device, what is its current price, and how are false alarms cancelled? [111]
  8. What are the exact cancellation, return-shipping, restocking, minimum-term, and unreturned-equipment charges in the purchase agreement? [106]
  9. Is spouse or two-user coverage currently available, and does it require separate devices or monitoring fees? [114]
  10. Can the buyer test the system at home and along the senior's regular routes before the return period ends? [113]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

MobileHelp is a good, but not unequivocally strong, fit for seniors living alone. The MobileHelp Duo is the most relevant choice for combined home-and-mobile protection, while Elite is appropriate for a senior who primarily needs mobile coverage. GPS, two-way communication, monitoring, and caregiver tools are meaningful advantages. The main tradeoffs are optional fall detection, battery and cellular-network dependence, potentially complex promotional pricing, and conflicting public information about contracts and cancellation fees. The buyer should obtain a written quote and reconcile the advertised no-long-term-contract language with the published three-month minimum and return-fee terms before purchasing [116].

For a broader comparison of options, see the full Seniors living alone consensus index. You can also browse all medical alert systems in our category directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Grok, Perplexity, and Kimi) that evaluated MobileHelp for the use case of seniors living alone. Each platform was asked to assess MobileHelp's fit based on criteria including fall detection, mobile coverage, GPS, response center, caregiver tools, pricing, contracts, battery life, and spouse coverage. Platform responses were normalized, deduplicated, and audited against a citation source catalog. The authoritative research date is 2026-07-27.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Most platforms reported research dates of 2026-08-24, while DeepSeek reported 2026-04-09. These are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions; no failed fetch was used as a verified domain key. Kimi could not verify MobileHelp details due to failed retrieval.
  • Identity used exact-name fallback; the matching reported domain was retained for downstream research but remains unverified.
  • AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. This review reports what platforms said, not independent verification of those claims.
  • Pricing and product availability are time-sensitive and may have changed since the research date.
  • Company-owned claims (from mobilehelp.com) are distinguished from independent reviews throughout this report.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • MobileHelp - Official website (unverified retrieval: https://mobilehelp.com/
  • Medical Alert Devices by MobileHelp: https://offers.mobilehelp.com/medical-alert-devices/
  • MobileHelp Official Website: https://www.mobilehelp.com/
  • MobileHelp® Duo | Best Medical Alert System for Seniors: https://www.mobilehelp.com/products/mobilehelp-duo/
  • Additional AI research evidence117 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    11. AI research evidence record google:c1
    12. AI research evidence record google:c3
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    14. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    19. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    34. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    35. AI research evidence record google:c1
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    45. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    46. AI research evidence record google:c1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    48. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    54. AI research evidence record google:c3
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    57. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    70. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    71. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    72. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    76. AI research evidence record google:c1
    77. AI research evidence record google:c2
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    82. AI research evidence record google:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    90. AI research evidence record google:c3
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    95. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    99. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    100. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    101. AI research evidence record google:c3
    102. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    103. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    105. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    107. AI research evidence record google:c3
    108. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    109. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    111. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    113. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    114. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    116. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    117. AI research evidence record openai:c11

Independent Sources

  • MobileHelp Review 2026: Pricing, Devices & Fees - MedAlert Info: https://medalertinfo.com/2026/07/26/mobilehelp-review/
  • MobileHelp Review 2026: Cost, Plans & Verdict: https://medicalalertreview.com/mobilehelp-review
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert System Review 2026 | U.S. News: https://realestate.usnews.com/home-services/medical-alert-system/mobilehelp
  • Best In-Home Monitoring Systems for Seniors Living Alone (2026: https://theseniorlivingreport.com/best-in-home-monitoring-systems-for-seniors-living-alone/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert System Review 2026 - Caring.com: https://www.caring.com/senior-products/best-medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp
  • Best Medical Alert Systems of 2026 - ElderLife Financial: https://www.elderlifefinancial.com/best-medical-alert-systems-of-2026/
  • MobileHelp Review: Good System Overall, But With 2 Negatives: https://www.medicalalertbuyersguide.org/medical-alert-system/mobilehelp-review/
  • MobileHelp Review: Good System Overall: https://www.medicalalertbuyersguide.org/reviews/mobilehelp/
  • MobileHelp Cost, Pricing, Packages & Monthly Plans: https://www.safehome.org/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert Systems Review 2026: https://www.safewise.com/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp-review/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert System Cost & Pricing in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert System Cost & Pricing in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/medical-alert/mobilehelp/costs/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert Review 2026 | SeniorsList: https://www.seniorslist.com/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp-reviews/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert: Costs, Systems, and Plans - The Senior List: https://www.theseniorlist.com/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp/
  • MobileHelp Medical Review, Hands-On Test (2026: https://www.theseniorlist.com/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp/reviews/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert Review: Pros, Cons, and Costs: https://www.usnews.com/360-reviews/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp
  • Additional AI research evidence117 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    11. AI research evidence record google:c1
    12. AI research evidence record google:c3
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    14. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    19. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    34. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    35. AI research evidence record google:c1
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    45. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    46. AI research evidence record google:c1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    48. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    54. AI research evidence record google:c3
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    57. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    70. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    71. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    72. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    76. AI research evidence record google:c1
    77. AI research evidence record google:c2
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    82. AI research evidence record google:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    90. AI research evidence record google:c3
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    95. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    99. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    100. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    101. AI research evidence record google:c3
    102. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    103. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    105. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    107. AI research evidence record google:c3
    108. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    109. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    111. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    113. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    114. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    116. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    117. AI research evidence record openai:c11

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Jul 27, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
33
Ranking mentions
5 of 7
Platform share
71%
Final consensus rank
#4

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, google, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi

Source mix

19 independent · 14 company-owned

Evidence support

24 direct · 8 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 ffe0ce7ac2a0e4ded646ca5991fddf07422526e3b8cb995e58297710f85974fb