AI Consensus Fit Review

Ella's Bubbles for Bariatric and Extra-Wide Bathing - AI Consensus Fit Review

Ella's Bubbles is a good-to-strong fit for bariatric and extra-wide bathing, with 5 of 7 platforms naming it during the ranking stage (71% platform share) and an average listed rank of 3.0.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Ella's Bubbles for Bariatric and Extra-Wide Bathing hero image
walk-in-tubsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

Ella's Bubbles is a good-to-strong fit for bariatric and extra-wide bathing, with 5 of 7 platforms naming it during the ranking stage (71% platform share) and an average listed rank of 3.0. The strongest reason to consider it is the unusually wide seating—24 to 29 inches across the Big4One, ShaK, and TransferXXL models—plus reinforced acrylic/stainless-steel construction and dual-drain technology. The main limitation is the absence of a clearly published maximum weight capacity; one platform rated the fit "uncertain" specifically because official specifications could not be verified. Buyers should confirm load ratings, exact seat dimensions, and total installed cost in writing before purchase.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage5 of 7 platforms
Share of included platform responses71%
Average listed rank3.0
Best listed rank1 (Anthropic, Google, Perplexity)
Relevant product/model/planBig4One (33″W x 66″L), ShaK (36″W x 72″L), TransferXXL (36″W x 55″L)
Overall use-case fitGood to strong (4 strong, 2 good, 1 uncertain)
Research date2026-08-13

Why Ella's Bubbles Qualified for This Study

Ella's Bubbles qualified because it was named by at least two platforms during the ranking stage for bariatric walk-in tubs. Five platforms—Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, Grok, and Perplexity—listed the company in their rankings, with three platforms (Anthropic, Google, Perplexity) placing it at rank 1. The company was evaluated against the category criteria of maximum weight capacity, seat width, door width, reinforced frame, floor traction, grab bar placement, water capacity, installation footprint, and warranty coverage.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Bariatric & Extra-Wide Bathing

The most relevant products are three bariatric-oriented walk-in tub models:

  • Big4One: 33 inches wide by 66 inches long, with a 24-inch seat width listed on the product page [1]. A separate specification PDF reports a 27 5/8-inch seat, creating a documented conflict [3].
  • ShaK: 36 inches wide by 72 inches long, with a 29-inch seat width [2]. DeepSeek's review references a 30.5-inch wide seat for the ShaK [5].
  • TransferXXL: 36 inches wide by 55 inches long, with a 29-inch molded seat and a 36-inch L-shaped outward-swinging door designed for wheelchair transfers [6].

The Big4One and ShaK are acrylic outward-swing-door models with bariatric emphasis; the TransferXXL is the wheelchair-transfer-focused option [1].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement: Ella's Bubbles offers some of the widest seats and largest footprints in the walk-in tub category. Four platforms rated the fit "strong" (DeepSeek, Google, Grok, Kimi) and two rated it "good" (Anthropic, OpenAI). The consensus centers on the unusually wide seating and interior dimensions.

Seat width is the standout feature. The Big4One's 24-inch seat and the ShaK's 29-inch seat were cited by multiple platforms as among the widest available [9]. The TransferXXL's 29-inch seat was independently confirmed by Kimi and Google [12].

Reinforced construction is documented. The Big4One specifications identify a fiberglass-gelcoat-reinforced acrylic shell and stainless-steel frame with adjustable leveling legs [14]. Independent reviews describe acrylic models with rust-proof stainless-steel frames reinforced with fiberglass mesh and gelcoat layers [15].

Safety features are standard. Textured slip-resistant flooring and two grab bars are listed for the Big4One and ShaK [9]. All models feature extra-low 3-inch thresholds and slip-resistant grippy floors [16].

Dual-drain technology is a consistent advantage. The proprietary dual-drain system drains tubs in 80-200 seconds, reducing exit wait times [17]. The Big4One is listed at 127 gallons unoccupied and 75-100 gallons occupied; the ShaK at 145 gallons unoccupied and 80-120 gallons occupied [9].

Outward-swing doors preserve interior clearance. The outward-swing design avoids an inward door consuming tub entry space [9]. Transfer models feature 36-inch L-shaped aluminum outswing doors with a 2-latch lock system [20].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Maximum weight capacity is the central unresolved issue. DeepSeek reported a 500-pound capacity for bariatric models based on the official website [21]. Grok reported "no set weight limit" across sources [22]. OpenAI and Anthropic found no explicit published weight rating in the reviewed official specifications [23]. Google noted promotional imagery showing users up to 350+ pounds but no formal rating [27]. This is a material conflict that buyers must resolve directly with the manufacturer.

Big4One seat width is documented inconsistently. The product page and comparison table list 24 inches, while the official specification PDF reports 27 5/8 inches [23]. The owner's manual contains conflicting seat-size figures for Big4One and ShaK [29].

ShaK seat width varies by source. The comparison page lists 29 inches [28], while DeepSeek's review references 30.5 inches [21].

TransferXXL naming is inconsistent. The model is referred to as both "TransferXXL" and "TransferXXXL" across sources, though dimensions are consistently 36″W x 55″L [30].

Perplexity could not verify the fit at all. The platform rated the fit "uncertain" because official-site retrieval failed and no verified product specifications, pricing, or warranty terms were available in its search results [32].

Fit ratings were not unanimous. Four platforms rated "strong," two rated "good," and one rated "uncertain." The "good" ratings from OpenAI and Anthropic reflect the missing weight-capacity documentation; the "uncertain" rating from Perplexity reflects a retrieval failure rather than negative evidence.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Maximum weight capacity: Unclear. No formal maximum user-weight rating was found in the reviewed official specifications [35]. DeepSeek's 500-pound claim [37] conflicts with other platforms' findings. Industry bariatric tubs typically support 400-600 pounds [38]. Treat the actual capacity as unverified until Ella provides a written rating for the selected configuration.

Seat width: Advantage. Big4One lists 24 inches; ShaK lists 29 inches; TransferXXL lists 29 inches [39]. These are among the widest seats identified in the category.

Door width: Mixed. The outward-swing Big4One and ShaK list a 20-inch door width [39]. The TransferXXL features a 36-inch L-shaped outswing door designed for wheelchair access [42]. The 20-inch opening may be restrictive for some users or caregiver-assisted transfers.

Reinforced frame: Advantage. Big4One specifications identify a fiberglass-gelcoat-reinforced acrylic shell and stainless-steel frame with adjustable leveling legs [36]. Independent sources describe stainless-steel frames with fiberglass mesh and gelcoat layers [43].

Floor traction: Advantage. Textured slip-resistant flooring is included on the reviewed outward-swing models [39]. All models feature slip-resistant grippy floors [44].

Grab bar placement: Advantage. Two grab bars are listed for Big4One and ShaK [39]. TransferXXL and Transfer models include two stainless-steel grab bars in chrome [44]. Exact locations and caregiver-side options should be confirmed.

Water capacity: Neutral. Big4One: 127 gallons unoccupied, 75-100 gallons occupied. ShaK: 145 gallons unoccupied, 80-120 gallons occupied [39]. The Bariatric-35 gelcoat model holds 170 gallons [46]. Higher capacity increases fill time, hot-water demand, and operating cost.

Installation footprint: Limitation. Big4One requires 33″W x 66″L; ShaK requires 36″W x 72″L; TransferXXL requires 36″W x 55″L [39]. These dimensions may require substantial bathroom remodeling and delivery-path planning.

Warranty coverage: Neutral. Ella advertises a limited lifetime warranty for the original purchaser at the original installation address [47]. The warranty excludes labor and installation [49]. The thermostatic control valve is covered for 1 year [51]. DeepSeek reported a 5-year warranty on parts and labor [52], which conflicts with other platforms' findings.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Product pricing varies by source. The official Big4One product page displayed a price range of $7,846 to $10,302 [53]. Grok reported Big4One base at approximately $7,846 and ShaK base at approximately $8,302 [54]. Google reported TransferXXL soaking models at approximately $3,999-$4,999, with fully loaded models up to $10,586+ [55]. Anthropic reported a general range of $3,000-$10,000, with typical models at $4,500-$5,500 [56]. DeepSeek reported pricing is quote-based and not publicly displayed [58].

Installation is not included. Ella's Bubbles does not provide installation service; buyers must hire independent contractors [56]. Industry-standard installation is estimated at $3,000-$5,000 [57]. DeepSeek estimated installation at $1,000-$3,000 [58]. These are industry averages, not Ella's-specific quotes.

Optional add-ons increase cost. Heated seat/backrest is approximately $490 [57] or $598 [59]. Jetting packages add several thousand dollars [57]. Therapy upgrades, digital controls, and faucet selections are separately priced [53].

Water heater upgrades may be required. Larger models require a 75-100 gallon water heater and dedicated GFCI-protected electrical circuits depending on the selected therapy package [60]. Some homes may need a dedicated secondary heater [55].

Warranty terms. Limited lifetime warranty on shells, frames, doors, and parts; excludes labor and installation [62]. Warranty is original purchaser only and nontransferable [62]. Shipping and replacement-part labor are not included [64]. Cartridge-cleaning service may incur labor and shipping charges [64].

Return policy. A 30-day return period exists [56]. Clearance units may be final sale or sold as-is [64]. No recurring subscription or service contract was identified [64].

Best Suited For

  • Heavier users needing 24-29 inch seat widths and 66-72 inch tub lengths [65]
  • Tall individuals up to 7 feet requiring extended legroom [67]
  • Wheelchair users needing transfer accessibility with 36-inch L-shaped outswing doors [69]
  • Caregivers seeking more bathing-room interior space than conventional 28-30 inch walk-in tubs provide [71]
  • Buyers prioritizing fast drainage with dual-drain technology [72]
  • Buyers wanting outward-swing doors, dual drains, adjustable leveling legs, and customizable hydrotherapy packages [71]

Probably Not Best Suited For

  • Buyers requiring a published, independently verified bariatric weight rating before purchase [74]
  • Bathrooms unable to accommodate a 33-inch-by-66-inch or 36-inch-by-72-inch footprint [76]
  • Users needing a wider-than-20-inch entry opening on the standard outswing models [76]
  • Buyers seeking an all-inclusive installation price or manufacturer-covered installation labor [78]
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking the lowest-cost bariatric option [78]
  • Homes with standard 40-50 gallon water heaters that cannot support the larger models' demand [80]

When Another Option May Be Better

  • If you need a documented weight capacity above 500 pounds, consider competitors with explicit published limits; industry bariatric tubs support 400-600 pounds [81].
  • If you need a compact footprint, other brands offer more space-efficient bariatric models; Ella's largest models require 33-36 inch widths [82].
  • If you want manufacturer-provided installation, Ella's requires separate contractor coordination; some competitors bundle installation [84].
  • If you need a transferable warranty, Ella's warranty is original purchaser only [85].
  • If you prefer inward-swing doors for tight bathroom spaces, consider alternatives like WalkIn Tubs of America's Royal at 32″W [86].
  • If you need extra soaking depth for very tall users, consider models with 46-inch tub heights [86].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. What is the certified maximum occupant weight for the exact Big4One, ShaK, or TransferXXL SKU and configuration? [87]
  2. Which Big4One seat width applies—24 inches or 27 5/8 inches—and why do official documents differ? [87]
  3. What is the clear usable door opening and interior transfer clearance after installation? [90]
  4. Can the manufacturer provide a dimensioned drawing showing seat, backrest, door, grab-bar, and caregiver clearances? [87]
  5. Are additional grab bars or caregiver-side supports available and structurally approved? [90]
  6. What water-heater size, drain capacity, electrical circuits, and GFCI requirements apply to the selected therapy package? [91]
  7. What is the delivered price including freight, installation, remodeling, taxes, and permit fees? [87]
  8. What is the return, cancellation, restocking, and damage-in-transit policy for made-to-order products? [94]
  9. Which parts are lifetime-covered versus shorter-term, and who pays shipping and labor? [95]
  10. How is warranty coverage affected if installed by an independent contractor, relocated, or modified? [97]
  11. What local installer and service coverage is available in your ZIP code? [97]
  12. Are the Big4One and ShaK models still available, and how do they compare to the TransferXXL for your needs? [98]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Ella's Bubbles is a good-to-strong fit for bariatric and extra-wide bathing, with 5 of 7 platforms naming it in the ranking stage and an average rank of 3.0. The consensus is that the company offers some of the widest seats (24-29 inches) and largest footprints in the category, with reinforced acrylic/stainless-steel construction, textured flooring, grab bars, and fast dual-drain technology. The TransferXXL's 36-inch L-shaped outswing door is specifically designed for wheelchair transfers.

However, the fit is not fully verified. The absence of a clearly published maximum weight capacity is the single most important gap, with platforms reporting conflicting information (500 pounds per DeepSeek, "no set limit" per Grok, and no formal rating per OpenAI and Anthropic). The Big4One seat-width documentation conflict (24 inches vs. 27 5/8 inches) and the lack of manufacturer-provided installation add further uncertainty. Perplexity could not verify the fit at all due to retrieval failure.

For buyers who can accommodate the large footprint, manage installation logistics independently, and obtain written confirmation of load ratings and exact dimensions, Ella's Bubbles is a compelling option. For buyers who need published weight guarantees, turnkey installation, or compact footprints, other brands may be better suited.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from fit-research responses supplied by seven AI platforms—Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, Grok, Kimi, OpenAI, and Perplexity—evaluating Ella's Bubbles for the bariatric and extra-wide bathing use case. Each platform provided an assessment of fit, strengths, limitations, pricing information, and use-case-specific findings. The responses were compiled and analyzed for consensus, conflicts, and gaps. The research date is 2026-08-13, with DeepSeek's response dated 2026-04-10.

Methodology Limitations

  • Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations (13 owned vs. 8 independent). Company claims should not be treated as independently verified.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; DeepSeek's response is dated 2026-04-10, while the study date is 2026-08-13.
  • Official-site retrieval failed for Perplexity, resulting in an "uncertain" rating based on missing verification rather than negative evidence.
  • Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing; conflicts are described and buyers are directed to verify.
  • No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification of product performance was conducted.
  • AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality; it reflects the platforms' analysis of the supplied sources.
  • Weight-capacity claims vary by platform (500 pounds per DeepSeek vs. no published limit per OpenAI/Anthropic) and could not be reconciled from the available evidence.

See the broader Bariatric & Extra-Wide Bathing consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Explore more walk in tubs guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Ella's Bubbles official website: https://ellasbubbles.com/
  • Bariatric Walk-In Tubs | Ella's Bubbles: https://ellasbubbles.com/bariatric-walk-in-tubs/
  • Ella Walk-In Tub Limited Lifetime Warranty: https://ellasbubbles.com/pdf/ellasbubbles_warranty.pdf
  • Compare Walk-In Tub Models + Prices: https://ellasbubbles.com/walk-in-tub/comparison/
  • Wheelchair Accessible Bariatric Tub 36x55 | Ella's Bubbles: https://ellasbubbles.com/walk-in-tubs/transfer-door/transferxxxl/
  • Wheelchair Transfer Tub 30x60 Transfer60 | Ella's Bubbles: https://ellasbubbles.com/walk-in-tubs/wheelchair-transfer-door/transfer60/
  • TransferXXL Wheelchair Accessible Bariatric Walk-In Tub 36x55 | Ella's Bubbles: https://ellasbubbles.com/walk-in-tubs/wheelchair-transfer-door/transferxxl/
  • Lifetime Limited Warranty: https://ellasbubbles.com/warranty/
  • Additional AI research evidence98 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    4. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    5. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    7. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    8. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    10. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    11. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    12. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    19. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    21. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    22. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    27. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    40. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    41. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    52. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    55. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    58. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    59. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    61. AI research evidence record google:2.2.4
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    65. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    70. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    80. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    82. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    83. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.2.4
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    98. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Independent Sources

  • 4 Best Bariatric Walk-In Tubs Compared | ConsumerAffairs®: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/homeowners/best-bariatric-walk-in-tubs.html
  • Ella's Bubbles Reviews (From First-hand Experiences: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/homeowners/ella-walk-in-baths.html
  • Ella's Bubbles Walk-in Tub Reviews | Retirement Living: https://www.retirementliving.com/reviews/ellas-bubbles
  • Additional AI research evidence98 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    4. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    5. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    7. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    8. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    10. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    11. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    12. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    19. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    21. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    22. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    27. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    40. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    41. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    52. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    55. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    58. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    59. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    61. AI research evidence record google:2.2.4
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    65. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    70. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    80. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    82. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    83. AI research evidence record google:2.3.5
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.2.4
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    98. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 13, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
21
Ranking mentions
5 of 7
Platform share
71%
Final consensus rank
#1

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

8 independent · 13 company-owned

Evidence support

19 direct · 1 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 638cc79c97a806f8c5dea4264196591e249d2f75ec2a6c649830d77b8d025207