AI Consensus Fit Review

Meditub 2646 Series for Compact Space & Small Bathrooms: AI Consensus Fit Review

The Meditub 2646 Series is a good but not fully verified fit for compact space and small bathroom retrofits.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Meditub 2646 Series for Compact Space & Small Bathrooms: AI Consensus Fit Review hero image
walk-in-tubsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

The Meditub 2646 Series is a good but not fully verified fit for compact space and small bathroom retrofits. Three of seven AI platforms named it during the ranking stage, and five of seven rated it "good" or "strong" for this use case. Its strongest reason for consideration is the genuinely compact 26-inch width × 46-inch length footprint with an inward-swinging door that preserves exterior aisle space. The main limitation is incomplete public data: seat width, exact threshold height, fill and drain times, and total installed pricing are either conflicting or unverified across sources. Buyers should treat this as a credible candidate requiring dealer confirmation of fit-critical specifications before purchase.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 (anthropic, grok, openai)
Share of included platform responses5 of 7 rated "good" or "strong"
Average listed rank3.0
Best listed rank1 (anthropic)
Relevant product/model/planMeditub 2646 Series 26" W × 46" L × 38" H compact walk-in bathtub (soaker, air, hydrotherapy, or dual-therapy)
Overall use-case fitGood but not fully verified
Research date2026-08-11

Why Meditub 2646 Series Qualified for This Study

The Meditub 2646 Series qualified because three of seven AI platforms (anthropic, grok, openai) named it during the ranking stage for best walk-in tubs for small bathrooms. Its average listed rank was 3.0, with a best rank of 1 from anthropic [1].

The model's core qualification rests on its compact exterior dimensions. Meditub lists the 2646 at 26 inches wide × 46 inches long × 38 inches high, making it one of the smaller walk-in tubs in the brand's lineup [1]. Independent retailers describe it as "perfect for small bathrooms, existing shower stalls, mobile homes, or small areas that a conventional tub cannot fit" [7].

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Compact Space & Small Bathrooms

The relevant product is the Meditub 2646 Series 26" W × 46" L × 38" H compact walk-in bathtub, available as a soaker, air therapy, hydrotherapy, or dual-therapy configuration [8]. The 2646 is a front-entry model with an inward-swinging door available in left- or right-side configurations [8].

Related compact Meditub models that may compete within the same use case include the 2653 Series (26" × 53", 65-gallon capacity), the 2739 Series (27" × 39", side-entry), the 2952 compact retrofit tub, and the 3238 Series (32" × 38", ultra-compact front-entry) [12].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement: The 2646's compact footprint is a genuine advantage for small bathrooms. Five platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, google) confirmed the 26" × 46" × 38" dimensions as favorable for narrow layouts [15]. Google called it "one of the smallest and most compact walk-in tubs on the market" [20].

Strong agreement: The inward-swinging door preserves exterior aisle space. Four platforms noted this as an advantage for tight bathrooms, since no exterior door-swing clearance is needed [15]. However, the door requires interior clearance and cannot be opened while the tub is filled [15].

Majority agreement: The 17-inch seat height meets accessibility standards. Three platforms confirmed a 17-inch ADA-compliant chair-height seat [15]. One platform (grok) cited a 17-inch seat width from a Home Depot specification sheet, while another (deepseek) estimated 19 inches; these figures conflict and should be verified [24].

Majority agreement: The low entry threshold aids accessibility. Sources cite either a 5-inch or 6-inch step-in threshold. Meditub's official page lists 5 inches [15], while independent retailers list 6 inches [27]. Both are lower than standard bathtubs.

Majority agreement: The 40-gallon capacity means faster fill and drain than larger tubs. Four platforms noted the 40-gallon maximum capacity as an advantage for fill/drain speed [15]. Google stated this "reduces the time bathers have to sit and wait in the cold" [20].

Majority agreement: Freestanding design aids retrofit flexibility. Three platforms noted the freestanding frame with adjustable leveling feet and removable access panels simplifies installation in existing tub openings [15].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Fit rating split: 5 "good/strong" vs. 2 "uncertain." Anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, and openai rated the 2646 as "good" or "strong" for compact spaces. Kimi and perplexity rated it "uncertain," citing insufficient publicly verifiable specifications [32].

Threshold height conflict: 5 inches vs. 6 inches. Meditub's official page lists a 5-inch low-entry step [34], while independent retailer listings state 6 inches [36]. This discrepancy should be resolved for the exact door, drain, and therapy configuration.

Seat width conflict: 17 inches vs. 19 inches. Grok cited a 17-inch seat width from a Home Depot specification sheet [39]. Google cited a 19-inch basin width from Ferguson specifications [40]. Deepseek estimated approximately 19 inches [41]. OpenAI noted the product page identifies a 17-inch seat height but does not clearly publish usable seat width [34].

Exterior height conflict: 37.375 inches vs. 38 inches. Google noted some retail product sheets list 37.375 inches while others list 38 inches [38]. An independent Walmart listing gives approximately 45.75 inches length and 37.375 inches height [36].

Fill and drain times: not verified. No platform found a Meditub-specific fill or drain time for the 2646. Anthropic applied industry standards of 6-8 minutes to fill with a fast-fill faucet and 2-3 minutes to drain [42]. Deepseek claimed a 30-gallon pump drains in 2-3 minutes, but this is unverified [41]. OpenAI noted Meditub's downloads do not establish a verified fill or drain time [43].

Positioning conflict: Is the 2646 the best compact Meditub? Anthropic noted the 2739 Series was explicitly identified as "Best Compact walk-in tub" in a 2019 ranking, suggesting the 2646 may be mid-tier rather than best-in-class within Meditub's own lineup [44].

Model designation confusion. Kimi flagged that the "2646" designation is used by both Meditub and American Tubs/Americana Series, creating potential confusion about which specifications apply to which brand [45].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Exterior Dimensions and Footprint

The 2646 measures 26" W × 46" L × 38" H, confirmed across multiple sources [48]. The 26-inch width fits narrow passages and standard 48-inch shower stalls, though the 46-inch length requires verification against the target alcove [54]. Google noted an optional 14-inch extension panel allows retrofitting into standard 60-inch alcove spaces [56].

Door Swing Clearance

The inward-swinging door requires no exterior clearance, which is advantageous in tight bathrooms [48]. However, the bather must step around the door to close and latch it inside the tight space, and the door cannot be opened while the tub is filled [53]. Anthropic noted inward-swinging doors "can make getting in/out more difficult" for some users [58].

Seat Width and Height

The 17-inch seat height is ADA-compliant and confirmed by multiple sources [48]. Seat width is disputed: 17 inches [60] vs. 19 inches [56]. The 19-inch basin width may feel restrictive for larger bathers [53].

Step-In Threshold Height

Sources conflict between 5 inches (Meditub official) and 6 inches (independent retailers) [48]. Both are lower than standard bathtubs.

Fill and Drain Speed

The 40-gallon maximum capacity is smaller than many competitors, which supports faster fill and drain cycles [48]. However, no verified Meditub-specific fill or drain time exists in public sources [65]. Deepseek's claim of 2-3 minute drain via a 30-gallon pump is unverified [61].

Installation and Serviceability

The tub is freestanding with adjustable leveling feet and removable access panels [48]. It can be placed in an existing bathtub opening or anywhere in the room [67]. Construction is described as high-gloss fiberglass with triple gel coat finish and stainless steel frame [49]. Google noted some retailers describe the shell as industrial-grade acrylic, creating a material conflict [53].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Pricing confidence is low to moderate across platforms. No platform verified a single authoritative Meditub 2646 price from the manufacturer.

Known tub-unit price ranges (platform-reported, not independently verified):

  • Google: Soaker model approximately $3,048-$5,198; air or hydrotherapy $5,610-$7,480; dual therapy $6,023-$8,030 [69]
  • Anthropic: Base unit $2,638-$4,004; MSRP $3,028 [70]
  • Kimi: No verified pricing; noted American Tubs D2646KS appears at approximately $3,000+ [71]

Total installed cost estimates:

  • Anthropic: $5,000-$8,000 for Meditub category based on budget positioning [70]
  • Anthropic: Installation labor $2,500-$8,000 depending on complexity; standard install $2,500-$3,500 [72]
  • Google: Installation typically $2,000-$5,000+ extra [69]
  • Kimi: Installation typically $1,500-$5,000 depending on plumbing modifications [73]

Additional fees identified:

  • Faucet set sold separately (model OPFHC) [69]
  • Electrical work for therapy jets: $300-$1,500 [72]
  • Plumbing modifications/rerouting: $500-$2,000 [72]
  • Demolition of old tub: $150-$500 [72]
  • Permits: $150-$1,000 [72]
  • Water heater upgrade: $1,400-$5,600 [72]

Warranty terms (platform-reported):

  • 10-year limited warranty on tub shell, frame, and finish [74]
  • Lifetime warranty on door seal [74]
  • 30-day return/exchange within original packaging [74]
  • 3-week lead time for made-to-order [74]

Important disclosure: OpenAI noted Meditub does not publish confirmed pricing and directs buyers to call; ConsumerAffairs reports dealer details are not listed online [75]. Kimi and perplexity found no verified pricing at all [76].

Best Suited For

  • Small or narrow bathrooms with approximately 26 inches of available tub width and 46 inches of usable length [78]
  • Retrofits of standard 60-inch alcove spaces using the optional 14-inch extension panel [81]
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking a basic safety tub without premium features; Meditub is positioned as an affordable brand with $5,000-$8,000 typical installed cost [82]
  • Users who prefer an inward-swinging door to preserve exterior circulation space [78]
  • Bathers who prefer lower water usage and faster fill/drain cycles due to the 40-gallon capacity [83]
  • Existing bathtub replacements where the alcove is approximately 26 × 46 inches [84]

Probably Not Best Suited For

  • Users needing a wide seat or substantial interior bathing space; the 19-inch basin width may feel restrictive for larger individuals [86]
  • Ultra-compact bathrooms where even 46 inches of length cannot be accommodated; the 2739 (39" length) or 3238 (38" length) may be better [88]
  • Users requiring side-entry accessibility for wheelchair transfers; the 2646 is a front-entry model [90]
  • Buyers needing documented fast-fill or fast-drain performance before purchase; no verified Meditub-specific times exist [92]
  • Buyers requiring firm all-in installed pricing before purchase; pricing is quote-based [94]
  • Users over 160 lbs or taller than 5'3" without verified seat dimensions; competitor 2646 models are rated for petite users [96]

When Another Option May Be Better

  • Ultra-compact footprint (<40 inches length): Meditub 2739 Series (27" × 39", side-entry) or 3238 Series (32" × 38", front-entry) [98]
  • Maximum water capacity in same width: Meditub 2653 Series offers 65 gallons vs. the 2646's 40 gallons [100]
  • Side-entry accessibility: Meditub 2739 or 2747 Series [98]
  • Quick-fill/quick-drain technology: Safe Step or American Standard brands [101]
  • Wheelchair accessibility or Hoyer lift compatibility: Meditub 2953WCA or 3060WCA Series [98]
  • Published specifications before purchase: American Tubs D2646KS has published specs including 17.5-inch seat width, 5-inch threshold, and 16-inch door width [102]
  • Outward-swinging door with confirmed clearance: Magnus Home Products compact lines [102]

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. What is the exact outside dimension including trim, access panels, faucet, and drain-side hardware for the selected 2646 configuration? [104]
  2. What minimum front, side, top, and service clearances does Meditub require for installation and maintenance? [104]
  3. What is the usable seat width — 17 inches or 19 inches? [105]
  4. Is the actual threshold 5 inches or 6 inches for the selected door and drain configuration? [104]
  5. What are the measured fill and drain times using the included faucet and drain, and is a powered fast-drain system available? [108]
  6. Does the quoted price include the faucet, hand shower, drain assembly, door hardware, access panels, delivery, and installation? [110]
  7. What electrical circuit, amperage, GFCI, ventilation, and maintenance requirements apply to air, hydrotherapy, or dual-therapy versions? [104]
  8. What are the written warranty, return, cancellation, damage-claim, and service-response terms? [111]
  9. Can the dealer provide a site-specific written installed quote after inspecting the bathroom and existing plumbing? [112]
  10. Which door and drain side best matches the bathroom's existing plumbing and transfer direction? [104]
  11. Will the existing water heater hold enough hot water (minimum 40 gallons) to fill this tub? [110]
  12. Is the model constructed of triple gel-coat fiberglass or acrylic? [113]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The Meditub 2646 Series is a credible compact-space candidate for small bathroom retrofits, but its ranking should be discounted until the buyer confirms fit-critical specifications. Five of seven platforms rated it "good" or "strong" for this use case, citing the genuinely compact 26" × 46" footprint, inward-swinging door, 17-inch ADA-compliant seat height, low entry threshold, and 40-gallon capacity that supports faster fill/drain cycles.

However, the two "uncertain" ratings (kimi, perplexity) highlight a real problem: seat width, exact threshold height, fill and drain times, and total installed pricing are either conflicting or unverified across public sources. The 2646 is not the most compact Meditub model (the 2739 and 3238 are shorter), not the highest-capacity (the 2653 offers 65 gallons), and not the best choice for side-entry needs.

For budget-conscious buyers retrofitting a standard alcove who can verify dimensions with a dealer, the Meditub 2646 Series is a reasonable choice. For buyers needing published specifications, transparent pricing, or wider seating, another option may be better.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, perplexity) that evaluated the Meditub 2646 Series for the "Compact Space & Small Bathrooms" use case. Each platform provided fit ratings, use-case findings across six criteria (exterior dimensions, door swing clearance, seat width, step-in threshold, fill/drain speed, total installed price), pricing assessments, and citations to source materials. The authoritative research date is 2026-08-11.

Platform fit ratings were: anthropic (good), deepseek (good), google (strong), grok (strong), kimi (uncertain), openai (good), perplexity (uncertain). Three platforms (anthropic, grok, openai) named the 2646 during the ranking stage; the other four evaluated it as part of the fit-research phase.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ: Deepseek's response is dated 2026-02-21, while the authoritative run date is 2026-08-11. This discrepancy is disclosed as provenance metadata and does not independently prove freshness.
  • Platform mentions vs. fit evaluations: All seven platforms evaluated fit, but only three named the entity during ranking discovery. The platform_mentions count (3) reflects ranking-stage mentions only.
  • Conflicting specifications not resolved: Seat width (17 vs. 19 inches), threshold height (5 vs. 6 inches), and exterior height (37.375 vs. 38 inches) conflicts are described but not resolved by guessing.
  • Unverified pricing: No platform verified a single authoritative price from Meditub. All pricing figures are platform-reported from retailer or industry sources and should be treated as estimates.
  • No independent testing: No platform conducted physical testing of the 2646. All findings are based on published specifications and retailer descriptions.
  • URLs not independently validated: The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Model designation confusion: The "2646" designation is used by multiple manufacturers, creating potential specification attribution risk [114].

Explore more walk in tubs guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Meditub Homepage: https://www.meditub.com/
  • Meditub™ 2653 Series - Official Product Page: https://www.meditub.com/meditub-2653-series/
  • Additional AI research evidence116 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    3. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:c1
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    11. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    13. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    19. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    20. AI research evidence record google:c1
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    24. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    25. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    29. AI research evidence record google:c2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    32. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    38. AI research evidence record google:c1
    39. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    40. AI research evidence record google:c2
    41. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    45. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    46. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    47. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    52. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    53. AI research evidence record google:c1
    54. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    55. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    56. AI research evidence record google:c2
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    60. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    61. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    69. AI research evidence record google:c3
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    71. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    73. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    76. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    77. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    81. AI research evidence record google:c2
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    83. AI research evidence record google:c1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    86. AI research evidence record google:c1
    87. AI research evidence record google:c2
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    89. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    91. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    95. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    97. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    99. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    103. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    105. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    106. AI research evidence record google:c2
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    108. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    110. AI research evidence record google:c3
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    113. AI research evidence record google:c1
    114. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    115. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    116. AI research evidence record kimi:c4

Independent Sources

  • Meditub 2646 Series Walk-In Bathtub - Bathry: https://bathry.com/products/meditub-walk-in-bathtub-2646-series
  • How Much Does a Walk-in Tub Cost? (2026) - Home Guide: https://homeguide.com/costs/walk-in-tub-cost
  • Meditub 2646 Walk-In Bathtub - Modern Bath Store: https://modernbathstore.com/products/meditub-walk-in-bathtub-2646
  • Best Walk-in Tubs for Seniors - Meditub Evaluation: https://trustedcompanyreviews.com
  • Meditub Reviews 2026: See What Customers Are Saying: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/homeowners/meditub.html
  • MediTub 2646LD Air / Whirlpool Walk In Tub Specifications: https://www.ferguson.com
  • MediTub 2646LBD/2646LH Specifications - Ferguson Home: https://www.fergusonhome.com/meditub-2646ld/s1444335
  • How Much Does It Cost to Install a Walk-in Tub in 2026? - Fixr: https://www.fixr.com/costs/walk-in-tub-installation
  • Walk-In Bathtub's Fill and Drain Times - HomeAdvisor: https://www.homeadvisor.com/near-me/walk-in-tub-install
  • Meditub Reviews - Best Accessible Tub - Luxury Freestanding Tubs: https://www.luxuryfreestandingtubs.com/blogs/news/meditub-reviews-best-accessible-tub
  • Meditub 2646LA 46 in. Fiberglass Air Walk In Tub: https://www.walmart.com/ip/985640629
  • Additional AI research evidence116 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    3. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:c1
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    11. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    13. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    19. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    20. AI research evidence record google:c1
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    24. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    25. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    29. AI research evidence record google:c2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    32. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    38. AI research evidence record google:c1
    39. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    40. AI research evidence record google:c2
    41. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    45. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    46. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    47. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    52. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    53. AI research evidence record google:c1
    54. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    55. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    56. AI research evidence record google:c2
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    60. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    61. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    69. AI research evidence record google:c3
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    71. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    73. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    76. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    77. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    81. AI research evidence record google:c2
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    83. AI research evidence record google:c1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    86. AI research evidence record google:c1
    87. AI research evidence record google:c2
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    89. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    91. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    95. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    97. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    99. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    103. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    105. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    106. AI research evidence record google:c2
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    108. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    110. AI research evidence record google:c3
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    113. AI research evidence record google:c1
    114. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    115. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    116. AI research evidence record kimi:c4

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 11, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
25
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#2

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

17 independent · 8 company-owned

Evidence support

16 direct · 9 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 5681ed78edf387d67603e1504c8c78e28fd2d8b6588cfba0986d728897a787a6