AI Consensus Fit Review

Universal Tubs 2653 Series for Compact Space & Small Bathrooms: AI Consensus Fit Review

The Universal Tubs 2653 Series is a mixed-to-strong fit for compact space and small bathroom retrofits, depending on which model designation is actually purchased.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Universal Tubs 2653 Series for Compact Space & Small Bathrooms: AI Consensus Fit Review hero image
walk-in-tubsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

The Universal Tubs 2653 Series is a mixed-to-strong fit for compact space and small bathroom retrofits, depending on which model designation is actually purchased. Two of seven AI platforms named this entity during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 4.0 and a best rank of 2. The strongest reason to consider it is the exceptionally narrow 26-inch width and short 46-inch length, which fits tight layouts where standard 60-inch tubs cannot go. The main limitation is a significant model-identification conflict: platforms recommended the B2646RWS (46 in. x 26 in.) while the 2653-series specification sheet describes a larger 52.75 in. x 26.375 in. footprint, and critical details like verified step-in height, door swing clearance, fill/drain times, and total installed cost remain unconfirmed across most sources.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 platforms (anthropic, openai)
Share of included platform responses28.6% (2 of 7)
Average listed rank4.0
Best listed rank2 (openai)
Relevant product/model/planB2646RWS 46 in. x 26 in. right-drain non-jetted soaking walk-in bathtub; also HB2646RWS and HB2653RWS variants
Overall use-case fitMixed (2 platforms: mixed; 2: strong; 1: good; 2: uncertain)
Research date2026-08-11

Why Universal Tubs 2653 Series Qualified for This Study

The Universal Tubs 2653 Series qualified because two of seven AI platforms (openai and anthropic) named it during the ranking-stage discovery for best walk-in tubs for small bathrooms. OpenAI ranked it 2nd; Anthropic ranked it 6th. The other five platforms (deepseek, google, grok, kimi, perplexity) did not name the entity during ranking discovery but did provide fit-research responses when asked to evaluate it against the compact-space criteria.

The entity was evaluated against six specific criteria: exterior dimensions and footprint, door swing clearance, seat width, step-in threshold height, fill and drain speed, and total installed price.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Compact Space & Small Bathrooms

The most relevant product is the Universal Tubs B2646RWS, a 46-inch by 26-inch right-drain non-jetted soaking walk-in bathtub. Six of seven platforms identified this model as the relevant product. Google identified the broader WTHDX Series (HB2646RWS and HB2653RWS) instead [1].

A critical conflict exists: the entity name is "2653 Series," but the recommended model is a 2646-series designation. OpenAI explicitly flagged this: "The ranking-stage recommendation names B2646RWS, while the evaluated entity is Universal Tubs 2653 Series; these are not the same model designation" [3]. The 2653-series specification sheet lists overall dimensions of approximately 52.75 in. L x 26.375 in. W x 37.5 in. H, while Home Depot lists the B2646RWS at 46 in. L x 26 in. W [3]. Buyers must confirm which model they are actually purchasing.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement: The 46-inch by 26-inch footprint is genuinely compact. Six platforms independently confirmed the B2646RWS measures 46 inches long by 26 inches wide [5]. Anthropic noted this falls at "the extreme compact end of the walk-in tub spectrum," well below the standard 52-60 inch range [11]. Google confirmed the narrow 26-inch width allows transit through standard doorways without wall demolition [9].

Strong agreement: The inward-swinging door is a double-edged sword. Multiple platforms noted the inward door conserves external floor space—critical in tiny bathrooms—but requires the user to enter before filling and remain inside until the tub drains [5]. Anthropic called this "a contradiction to walk-in tub's accessibility promise" for users with limited mobility [13].

Strong agreement: The non-jetted soaking configuration simplifies installation. The B2646RWS has no jets, which means no electrical requirements for jet pumps, simpler plumbing, and no ongoing jet maintenance [5]. Google confirmed the soaker models do not feature hydrotherapy jets unless upgraded to more expensive jetted variants [15].

Majority agreement: The tub is designed for petite users. Anthropic and its cited sources consistently identified the 2653 series as designed for users approximately 5'4" tall and 80-160 lbs [16]. This is a material limitation for average or larger adults.

Majority agreement: The listed price is low but installation is separate. Home Depot lists the B2646RWS at $1,899.99 [5]. Google listed the HB2646RWS at $1,996.00 and the HB2653RWS at $2,299.99 [12]. All platforms agreed professional installation is sold separately and typically adds $1,500-$5,000+ [18].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Fit rating disagreement. Platforms split across the spectrum: Google and Grok rated it "strong," Anthropic rated it "good," OpenAI and DeepSeek rated it "mixed," and Kimi and Perplexity rated it "uncertain." This is a genuinely mixed consensus, not a unanimous one.

Model identity conflict. OpenAI flagged that the recommended B2646RWS is a 2646-series model, not a 2653-series model [20]. Kimi noted "the exact relationship between 'Universal Tubs 2653 Series' and model 'B2646RWS' is unclear—whether 2653 denotes a series name, a SKU prefix, or a different product line" [22]. Anthropic noted confusion between B2646RWS (Builder's Series) and HD2646RWS (HD Series), with unclear whether they are identical products under different branding [23].

Dimension conflict. The 2653-series specification sheet lists 52.75 in. x 26.375 in. overall dimensions, while the B2646RWS is listed at 46 in. x 26 in. [20]. These are materially different footprints.

Pricing uncertainty. OpenAI verified $1,899.99 at Home Depot [20]. Google verified $1,996.00 for HB2646RWS and $2,299.99 for HB2653RWS [24]. Anthropic estimated approximately $1,900 based on ANZZI retail and noted the actual Home Depot price for B2646RWS was "not confirmed in 2026 search results" [23]. DeepSeek stated pricing was "not explicitly listed" and estimated $1,500-$2,500 [25]. Perplexity said pricing was "unclear" [26].

Step-in threshold height. The 2653-series specification sheet lists a 6-inch step-in height [21]. Anthropic noted sources state "low entry threshold" but exact measurement was not confirmed [27]. Grok, DeepSeek, Kimi, and Perplexity all said threshold height was unclear or unverified [29].

Seat width. The 2653-series specification sheet lists a 19-inch seat width and 19.875-inch interior width [21]. Grok's source listed 16-inch seat width [29]. Anthropic's sources cited 17-19 inches [32]. These figures conflict and none are confirmed for the B2646RWS specifically.

Fill and drain speed. OpenAI noted the B2646RWS includes a quick-fill faucet but no verified gallons-per-minute rate, and a Home Depot customer review reported slow filling [20]. No powered fast drain is documented for the B2646RWS [20]. Google noted the 46-inch model has approximately 50-gallon water capacity with a "Quick Fill" faucet set [35]. Anthropic confirmed no powered drain on the soaking model [23].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Exterior Dimensions and Footprint

The B2646RWS measures 46 in. L x 26 in. W, placing it at the extreme compact end of walk-in tubs [37]. Independent sources classify 46-47 inch models as qualifying for small-space categories [42]. The 2653-series specification sheet lists 52.75 in. L x 26.375 in. W x 37.5 in. H [43]. Google confirmed the narrow 26-inch width allows the unit to slide through tight bathroom doorways without wall demolition [41].

Door Swing and Clearance

The B2646RWS has an inward-swinging door [37]. The 2653-series specification sheet lists 10.5-inch door clearance, but it is unclear whether that applies to B2646RWS [43]. Anthropic's sources cited 16-17-inch door width [45]. Kimi noted industry guidance that outward-swinging doors require 18-24 inches of clear floor space, while inward-swinging doors need no external clearance but trap the user inside until draining completes [47].

Seat Width and Bathing Interior

The 2653-series specification sheet lists 19-inch seat width, 19.875-inch interior width, and 13.75-inch seat height [43]. Grok's source listed 16-inch seat width and 17-inch soaking depth [40]. Anthropic's sources cited 17-19-inch seat width [48]. The Home Depot listing identifies an ADA seat but does not publish the same dimensional specification [37]. The narrow interior may feel cramped for standard-frame adults [48].

Step-In Threshold

The 2653-series specification sheet lists a 6-inch step-in height [43]. Home Depot describes the B2646RWS as having a "low step-in entry" but does not state the exact threshold [37]. Anthropic noted 36-inch overall tub height with low entry threshold [45]. For comparison, the American Tubs D2646KS specifies a 5-inch threshold [49].

Fill and Drain Speed

The B2646RWS includes a quick-fill faucet [37]. No verified gallons-per-minute rate or full-fill time was located. A Home Depot customer review reported the tub took a long time to fill, but this is anecdotal [50]. The B2646RWS is non-jetted with no powered fast drain documented [37]. Fast-drain features appear on other Universal Tubs models, so they should not be assumed here [51]. Google noted the 46-inch model has approximately 50-gallon water capacity [52].

Retrofit Compatibility

The 2653-series product information describes a 7-inch extension kit for 60-inch retrofit installation [53]. Google's sources describe a matching extension kit up to 14 inches to fill standard 60-inch alcoves [41]. It is unclear whether the same kit is included with B2646RWS [53]. A 46-inch tub may not directly replace a standard 60-inch alcove without wall, flooring, plumbing, or extension work [37].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Known unit prices:

  • B2646RWS: $1,899.99 at Home Depot [54]
  • HB2646RWS (46 in.): $1,996.00 [55]
  • HB2653RWS (53 in.): $2,299.99 [55]
  • HD2646RWS (similar 46-inch model): $2,706 discounted from $3,383 [56]

Installation costs (separate):

  • Basic walk-in tub labor: $1,388-$2,443 [57]
  • Standard walk-in tub installation with plumbing modifications: $2,000-$5,000 [57]
  • Total installed cost typically $5,000-$15,000 in 2026 [58]
  • Plumbing modifications: $400-$1,500 [56]
  • Subfloor reinforcement: $300-$800 [56]
  • Water heater upgrade: $600-$3,100 [56]
  • Removal of existing tub: $75-$150 [56]

Warranty (company-reported):

  • 10-year warranty on tub shell [59]
  • 1-year warranty on parts [59]
  • Lifetime warranty on door watertight seal [59]

Return policy:

  • Home Depot: 90-day return window for most items [61]
  • Special-order items like walk-in tubs may have different return terms [62]

Delivery:

  • The manufacturer page for related 2653 models states curbside delivery only [63]
  • Home Depot offers free delivery to curb, but customer is responsible for transport into home [56]

Unverified costs: Sales tax, delivery fees, permits, demolition, disposal, wall repair, and financing terms were not quantified in the supplied sources. Perplexity noted pricing was "unclear" from its evidence set [64].

Best Suited For

  • Small bathrooms under 5'x6' or three-quarter bath dimensions where a standard 60-inch tub cannot fit [65]
  • Petite users approximately 5'4" tall and 80-160 lbs [67]
  • Narrow doorways and hallways where the 26-inch width allows maneuverability without wall demolition [69]
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking a non-jetted soaking tub with a low listed price [72]
  • Retrofits in older homes, mobile homes, or apartments with narrow layouts [65]
  • Buyers who prefer no jets and want to avoid ongoing jet maintenance and electrical requirements [72]

Probably Not Best Suited For

  • Average-to-large frame adults who will find the 16-19 inch seat width cramped [74]
  • Users with limited mobility or balance issues who need an outward-swinging door for easier entry and exit [77]
  • Standard 60-inch alcove replacements without significant cutaway modification or plumbing relocation [79]
  • Buyers requiring verified fast-fill and fast-drain times [80]
  • Users needing hydrotherapy jets for therapeutic purposes [79]
  • Wheelchair transfers or lateral access needs [80]
  • Buyers who want a single turn-key contract bundling tub purchase and installation [84]

When Another Option May Be Better

  • Choose a model with a verified powered fast drain when the user has difficulty remaining seated for a long drain cycle [85]
  • Choose a wheelchair-accessible or outward-transfer model when the user transfers from a wheelchair or needs lateral access [85]
  • Choose a 60-inch retrofit model when preserving a standard tub alcove is more important than minimizing tub length [85]
  • Choose the American Tubs D2646KS when you need verified ADA compliance, a confirmed 5-inch threshold, and an integrated extension kit for 60-inch alcoves [87]
  • Choose a jetted compact model like the Universal Tubs HD2653RWD (at $3,800+) or ANZZI 27x53 models when therapeutic jets are needed within a compact footprint [88]
  • Choose another supplier or installer when a firm, itemized installed price and defined warranty/service package are required before purchase [85]

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Is the intended product B2646RWS, HD2646RWS, HB2646RWS, or a true 2653-series model? The model designations conflict across sources [90].
  2. What are the exact assembled exterior dimensions, including faucet, trim, extension kit, and required service access? [90]
  3. What is the exact seat width, interior width, seat height, threshold height, and door-clearance requirement? Sources list 16, 17, and 19 inches for seat width [91].
  4. Does the door swing inward, and how much unobstructed space is required inside the bathroom and beside the tub? [90]
  5. What are the measured fill time and drain time using the home's actual water pressure, water-heater capacity, and drain configuration? [90]
  6. Does B2646RWS include a powered fast drain, or only a standard cable-operated drain? [90]
  7. Is a 7-inch or 14-inch retrofit extension kit included with this exact model? [98]
  8. Will the unit fit through the home's doors, hallways, and stairways, and is delivery curbside or room-of-choice? [98]
  9. What is the written warranty for the door seal, shell, faucet, drain, and any service parts? [94]
  10. What is the complete installed price, including demolition, plumbing, electrical if required, permits, delivery, disposal, wall repair, and taxes? [90]
  11. What are the retailer's return and cancellation rules after delivery or attempted installation? [105]
  12. Is the bathroom floor reinforced for 1,000+ lbs filled weight? Second-floor installations may need structural evaluation [101].
  13. What is the current water heater capacity? A 50-gallon tub fill may exceed a standard 40-50 gallon heater [101].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The Universal Tubs 2653 Series—specifically the B2646RWS 46-inch model—is a mixed fit for compact space and small bathrooms. The narrow 26-inch width and short 46-inch length are genuinely exceptional for tight layouts, and the $1,899.99 listed price is competitive for a walk-in tub. However, the entity cannot be rated a strong fit until the buyer resolves the 2646-versus-2653 model mismatch and obtains verified dimensions, door-clearance requirements, drain performance, and a complete installed quote.

The inward-swinging door is the most significant design trade-off: it saves external floor space but traps the user inside until draining completes, which is a critical safety consideration for the target demographic. The tub is designed for petite users (approximately 5'4", 80-160 lbs), which eliminates much of the general market. Fill and drain performance, installation cost, and actual door-clearance requirements are not sufficiently documented across the supplied sources for a strong-fit rating.

For buyers who fit the narrow use case—petite users in genuinely space-constrained bathrooms under 5'x6'—this tub is a reasonable, affordable option. For everyone else, verify all specifications directly with Home Depot or Universal Tubs before purchasing, and compare against better-documented alternatives like the American Tubs D2646KS where independent verification is possible [107].

For a broader comparison of compact walk-in tub options, see the full Compact Space & Small Bathrooms consensus index. You can also browse all walk in tubs covered in this research series.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced on 2026-08-11 by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity. Each platform evaluated the Universal Tubs 2653 Series against six criteria: exterior dimensions and footprint, door swing clearance, seat width, step-in threshold height, fill and drain speed, and total installed price. Platform responses were compiled, deduplicated, and analyzed for agreement, disagreement, and evidence quality. The entity was named during ranking-stage discovery by 2 of 7 platforms (anthropic and openai).

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. DeepSeek's research date is 2026-04-15, while the authoritative run date is 2026-08-11. All other platforms used 2026-08-11. This discrepancy is disclosed as a methodology limitation.
  • Platform mentions count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. All seven platforms evaluated fit, but only two named the entity during ranking. This does not imply the other five platforms consider it unqualified.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Some URLs are redirect links (e.g., Google's grounding-api-redirect URLs) and may not be stable.
  • Model identity conflicts were not resolved by guessing. The B2646RWS, HB2646RWS, HD2646RWS, and 2653-series designations overlap in unclear ways across sources. Buyers must verify the exact model.
  • AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. This review reports what the platforms said; it does not independently verify performance claims.
  • No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed for this review beyond the supplied platform responses and cited sources.
  • Pricing and availability are time-sensitive. The listed prices were current as of the research date but may change.
  • Some claims are company-reported rather than independently verified. Warranty terms (10-year shell, lifetime door seal) are attributed to Universal Tubs company claims via independent sources [108].

Explore more walk in tubs guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Can a Walk-In Tub Fit in a Small Bathroom? - American Bath and Shower: https://americanbathandshower.com/can-a-walk-in-tub-fit-in-a-small-bathroom/
  • Universal Tubs 2653 Series / B2646RWS product availability context: https://www.homedepot.com/
  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record google:c1
    2. AI research evidence record google:c2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    8. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:c1
    10. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    12. AI research evidence record google:c2
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    14. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    15. AI research evidence record google:c3
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    22. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    24. AI research evidence record google:c2
    25. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    29. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    35. AI research evidence record google:c3
    36. AI research evidence record google:c1
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    39. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    40. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    41. AI research evidence record google:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    44. AI research evidence record google:c2
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    47. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    49. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    52. AI research evidence record google:c3
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    55. AI research evidence record google:c2
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    61. AI research evidence record google:c3
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    64. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    69. AI research evidence record google:c1
    70. AI research evidence record google:c2
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    76. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    78. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    83. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    84. AI research evidence record google:c3
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    87. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    89. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    92. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    93. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    99. AI research evidence record google:c1
    100. AI research evidence record google:c2
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    105. AI research evidence record google:c3
    106. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record google:c1
    2. AI research evidence record google:c2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    8. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:c1
    10. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    12. AI research evidence record google:c2
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    14. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    15. AI research evidence record google:c3
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    22. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    24. AI research evidence record google:c2
    25. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    29. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    35. AI research evidence record google:c3
    36. AI research evidence record google:c1
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    39. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    40. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    41. AI research evidence record google:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    44. AI research evidence record google:c2
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    47. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    49. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    52. AI research evidence record google:c3
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    55. AI research evidence record google:c2
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    61. AI research evidence record google:c3
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    64. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    69. AI research evidence record google:c1
    70. AI research evidence record google:c2
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    76. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    78. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    83. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    84. AI research evidence record google:c3
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    87. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    89. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    92. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    93. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    99. AI research evidence record google:c1
    100. AI research evidence record google:c2
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    105. AI research evidence record google:c3
    106. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 11, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
24
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#4

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

18 independent · 5 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

20 direct · 2 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 6475aa94651ee0c2e26ed1360437199d001c0089a7719bf0a0d6d6c5e3ac5359