AI Consensus Fit Review

HOROW WT52-L Review for Limited Mobility

The HOROW WT52-L is a mixed fit for High-Accessibility Bathing.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
AI Consensus Fit Review research report illustration
Independent AI consensus researchWe compare multiple AI platforms to surface agreement, disagreement, and buyer-specific tradeoffs.

Answer Capsule

The HOROW WT52-L is a mixed fit for High-Accessibility Bathing. Two of the seven platforms that evaluated fit named it during the ranking stage, at an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best rank of 4. Its strongest case is price-to-feature value: a 5.5-inch threshold, an advertised ADA seat rated to 440 pounds, three handles, a handheld shower, and textured anti-slip flooring, typically listed between roughly $1,994 and $2,499. The main limitation is documentation, not features: door-opening width, grab-bar placement, drain time, and warranty terms are unclear or conflicting, and the 5.5-inch step is not an ultra-low or zero-step entry. Buyers who cannot reliably clear 5.5 inches should look elsewhere.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 platforms (anthropic, kimi)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank4.5
Best listed rank4
Relevant product/model/planHOROW WT52-L 52-inch Walk-In Tub with Shower, ADA Seat, and Three Handles
Overall use-case fitMixed
Research date2026-09-25

Why HOROW WT52-L Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is HOROW WT52-L a good choice for High-Accessibility Bathing for a senior with balance issues?
  • Why did only 2 of 7 AI platforms name HOROW WT52-L during the ranking stage?

HOROW WT52-L qualified because it was named during ranking discovery by two of the seven platforms that evaluated fit for this use case, and because its advertised specifications map directly onto the category criteria. Anthropic listed it at rank 4 and kimi at rank 5, producing an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best rank of 4. That is a minority of the platform set, so the entity's presence in this study reflects partial discovery rather than broad consensus.

The qualification is also substantive, not just positional. HOROW's product page describes a 5.5-inch entry threshold, an 18-inch seat rated to 440 pounds, a door requiring less than 30 pounds of force, three thickened handles, a textured anti-slip floor, and an integrated handheld shower [1]. Retail listings at Home Depot and Lowe's independently repeat the 5.5-inch threshold, the integrated seat, the ADA designation, and the left-drain configuration [3]. Those attributes align with the configured criteria for this category: low step-in threshold, ADA seat height, grab bar placement, slip-resistant flooring, and shower usability.

The qualification is limited in one important way. The platforms that did not name HOROW WT52-L during ranking did not necessarily reject it; they simply did not surface it. Missing mentions are not evidence of disagreement, and this review does not treat them as such.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to High-Accessibility Bathing

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which HOROW WT52-L configuration is the right one for High-Accessibility Bathing?
  • Is the HOROW WT52-L a soaking tub or a jetted tub, and does that matter for a limited-mobility bather?

The relevant unit is the HOROW WT52-L 52-inch Walk-In Tub with Shower, ADA Seat, and Three Handles, a non-electric soaking tub with a left-hand drain. It is the base model in a two-model line; the WT52-LE is a separate, higher-priced variant with massage jets and chromotherapy [5].

The WT52-L is described as 100% acrylic, rust-resistant in its hardware, and operable without electricity, which HOROW frames as a lower failure rate than powered alternatives [6]. Retail specifications list it at approximately 52.5 inches long by 26.5 inches wide by 40 inches high with a left drain [7]. HOROW's own article cites 52 by 28 by 40 inches, so the footprint figures conflict across sources and should be confirmed before ordering (perplexity:3).

The bathing configuration is seated soaking plus a handheld shower, not hydrotherapy. HOROW's marketing describes "99 anti-slip massage granules" in the floor texture; that is a grip surface, not powered massage [9]. Buyers who want jets need the WT52-LE, which HOROW lists at $2,999 [10].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree the HOROW WT52-L does well for limited-mobility bathing?
  • Does the HOROW WT52-L actually have a 5.5-inch step-in threshold and an ADA seat?

Agreement was strong on the core advertised specifications and mixed on everything that requires measurement. Five platforms cited the same headline numbers from HOROW's product page: a 5.5-inch threshold, an 18-inch ADA seat rated to 440 pounds, three handles, a door requiring under 30 pounds of force, textured anti-slip flooring, and an integrated handheld shower [11].

The 5.5-inch threshold was the most consistently repeated figure, appearing in HOROW's own materials and in Home Depot, Lowe's, and Wayfair listings [11]. Platforms generally treated this as a meaningful improvement over a standard tub while noting it is not an ultra-low or near-floor threshold.

Platforms also agreed on the non-electric design and its practical implication: no powered drain, no powered jets, and no dependence on a GFCI circuit for the base model [12]. Several treated this as a reliability advantage for buyers worried about power outages or mechanical failure.

Agreement on price direction was also broad, though not on exact figures. Every platform that found pricing placed the tub in roughly the $2,000 to $2,500 band [11].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why do AI platforms disagree about whether HOROW WT52-L is a good fit for severe mobility limitations?
  • Is the HOROW WT52-L seat height 17 inches or 18 inches?

Fit ratings diverged sharply. Grok rated the WT52-L a strong fit; anthropic and google rated it good; openai and perplexity rated it mixed; deepseek and kimi rated it uncertain. That spread reflects different tolerances for missing documentation rather than different product facts.

The seat-height conflict is unresolved. HOROW's product page states 18 inches, while HOROW's own article states 17 inches [17]. Most platforms repeated 18 inches, but the discrepancy is documented and buyers should not rely on the ADA label without confirming the measured height from the finished floor.

Door-opening width is the largest gap. No reviewed source publishes a clear door-opening width for the WT52-L, which makes wheelchair or caregiver-assisted lateral transfer suitability unverifiable [19]. HOROW describes an inward-swinging watertight door, and an inward swing requires the bather to step around the door inside the tub [21].

Drain performance is described inconsistently. HOROW's article claims a dual-drain system and fast-fill faucet, but the main product listing does not publish a drain-time specification [18]. HOROW's own installation guide cites typical walk-in tub drain times of 5 to 10 minutes and fill times of 6 to 15 minutes, and describes waiting in the tub as cold and uncomfortable [22]. No platform confirmed a verified drain time for this model.

Availability and warranty terms are also unsettled. HOROW's product page displayed the model as sold out when reviewed, while Home Depot and Lowe's listed it separately [17]. Warranty references conflict across HOROW materials, including one-year, two-year, and five-year claims attached to different models or channels [26].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • Does the HOROW WT52-L have grab bars, and are their positions documented well enough for a caregiver-assisted transfer?
  • How does the HOROW WT52-L handle slip resistance and seated showering for a bather with arthritis?

Step-in threshold. HOROW and major retail listings specify a 5.5-inch entry threshold, materially lower than a standard tub but not an ultra-low or zero-step entry [29]. For comparison, competitors in this category advertise thresholds as low as 115 to 145 millimeters, roughly 4.5 to 5.7 inches, and some publish exact figures while HOROW's is repeated across retail listings [31].

Seat and transfer support. The tub is advertised with an integrated ADA seat rated to 440 pounds [29]. Seat height is stated as 18 inches on the product page and 17 inches in HOROW's article, so the ADA claim should be verified against a measured dimension [29].

Door opening and door effort. HOROW describes an inward-swinging, watertight door requiring less than 30 pounds of force [29]. Anthropic flagged that 30 pounds exceeds the 5-pound maximum typically associated with ADA lever-handle guidance, which matters for buyers with severe hand arthritis [34]. Clear door-opening width is not published [35].

Grab bars. The product page advertises three thickened handles, and HOROW's article describes them as strategically positioned for entry, bathing, and exit [29]. No reviewed source provides a dimensioned drawing or load ratings, so reach and transfer assessment is not possible from public materials [29].

Slip resistance. HOROW advertises a textured anti-slip floor with 99 anti-slip massage granules [37]. No independent coefficient-of-friction rating or standardized slip-resistance certification was identified in the reviewed evidence.

Shower usability. The model includes an integrated handheld shower, which supports seated bathing and reduces the need to stand [29]. Whether the controls are reachable from every seated position, or whether the head is independently height-adjustable, is not established in the reviewed materials.

Dimensions and bathroom fit. Retail specifications list approximately 52.5 by 26.5 by 40 inches with a left drain [30]. HOROW's article cites 52 by 28 by 40 inches (perplexity:3). The narrow width may help fit some alcove replacements but may limit maneuvering and assisted transfers.

Installation and electrical. The owner's manual calls for a dedicated grounded 110V/60Hz supply and a GFCI-protected circuit, which can add installation complexity and cost even though the base tub is described as non-electric (perplexity:13, perplexity:14).

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does the HOROW WT52-L cost, and which seller has the lowest listed price?
  • What installation, shipping, and warranty costs should a HOROW WT52-L buyer expect beyond the tub price?

Listed prices vary by seller and are not directly comparable. HOROW's product page showed $2,499 [39]. Home Depot listings showed $1,994 per pallet in one review and $2,099 or $2,249 in others [39]. Lowe's showed $2,158 [39]. Wayfair showed $2,099 (perplexity:2). Anthropic reported a $2,294 Home Depot promotional price and an estimated $1,874 with a 25% coupon code [41].

Additional costs are largely undisclosed. Shipping or pallet-delivery charges, professional installation, bathroom remodeling, drain relocation, hot-water capacity changes, and disposal of an existing tub are not stated in the reviewed listings [39]. Google's review estimated professional plumbing and electrical installation at $2,000 to $5,000 depending on regional rates, plus possible subfloor reinforcement or tiling [43]. That figure is platform-reported and not tied to a specific HOROW quote.

Contract and cancellation terms are unclear. HOROW-specific cancellation, return, restocking, and warranty terms for this model were not clearly established from the reviewed product page [39]. Home Depot lists a 90-day return period, but retailer conditions and exclusions should be confirmed [44]. Grok reported 90-day returns on the official site and refunds for cancellations before shipment (grok:1). HOROW's terms of service state that sales tax is added as required, prices may change at any time, and certain states allow cancellation without penalty before midnight of the third business day after the agreement (official:C2).

Warranty coverage conflicts across sources. HOROW's warranty page describes a one-year limited warranty on manufacturing defects in workmanship [45]. Other HOROW materials reference a two-year warranty available through the official store and a five-year limited warranty on the WT52-LE [46]. The applicable term for the WT52-L specifically is not clearly established.

Insurance and reimbursement. Medicare Parts A and B do not cover walk-in tubs, and insurance coverage is rare [48]. Buyers should treat the purchase as out-of-pocket.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is the HOROW WT52-L actually best for in High-Accessibility Bathing?
  • Is the HOROW WT52-L worth it for a senior who can still step over a low threshold but needs seated bathing?

The WT52-L is best suited to buyers who can safely step over approximately 5.5 inches but need substantially easier access than a conventional tub [49]. That includes users with moderate balance concerns who want seated bathing, a handheld shower, and multiple grip points without paying specialist walk-in tub prices.

It also fits bathrooms suited to a compact 52.5-inch left-drain alcove with an integrated seat and shower [50]. Buyers prioritizing a relatively low advertised purchase price over turnkey installation and independently verified accessibility specifications are the clearest match [49].

Users who value a non-electric design for reliability during power outages are also a reasonable fit, since the base model does not depend on powered massage or drain equipment [53].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not buy the HOROW WT52-L for High-Accessibility Bathing?
  • Is the HOROW WT52-L suitable for a wheelchair user or someone who cannot lift a leg over 5.5 inches?

Buyers who cannot reliably lift a foot over a 5.5-inch threshold, or who require wheelchair-level transfer access, should not choose this model [54]. The threshold is low but not ultra-low, and no reviewed source publishes a clear door-opening width for transfer assessment [55].

Buyers who need documented wide door openings, precisely specified grab-bar locations, or verified rapid drainage before purchase are also poor fits [54]. The same applies to buyers seeking a bundled installation, a long-term service network, or a clearly published all-in ownership cost [54].

Users with severe hand weakness may struggle despite the low-force door claim, because the stated 30-pound opening force exceeds the 5-pound maximum typically associated with ADA lever-handle guidance [57]. Bariatric users above the 440-pound seat rating should look at higher-capacity models [58].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to the HOROW WT52-L for a buyer who needs a verified ultra-low threshold?
  • Which walk-in tub should a buyer choose instead of the HOROW WT52-L if they need wheelchair transfer access?

Choose a model with a genuinely lower threshold or a ramp-style entry when the buyer cannot safely clear 5.5 inches [59]. Age Care Bathrooms' Tranquility advertises a 145-millimeter threshold with an extra-wide outward-opening door and a lifetime leak-free seal guarantee, priced from £7,450 fully installed in the UK [60]. That is a UK-market product and not a direct US substitute.

Choose a model with a published clear door width when wheelchair or caregiver-assisted transfers are central. Ella's Bubbles TransferXXL advertises a 36-inch wide L-shaped outward-swing door with a gear-and-shaft two-latch lock system [61]. Meditub's 2953WCA advertises a 21-inch chair-height ADA seat, a wide outward-swinging door, and slip-resistant flooring, with listed prices ranging from about $4,677 to $8,470 depending on the source [62].

Choose a powered-drain model when exit wait time is a concern. ANZZI's Coupe Series AZ2953-PRX advertises an HD powered fast drain emptying in under a minute, dual hydrotherapy, and an inline heater, listed at $4,106.25 [63]. Universal Tubs' HD Series advertises a powered fast drain and quick-fill faucet [64].

Choose the HOROW WT52-LE instead of the WT52-L if the buyer wants massage jets and chromotherapy; HOROW lists it at $2,999 [65].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a HOROW WT52-L buyer confirm with the seller before paying?
  • Which HOROW WT52-L specifications are unverified and need written confirmation?

Ask the seller for written answers to these items before committing:

  • What is the exact clear door-opening width, measured at the narrowest point [67]?
  • Is the threshold exactly 5.5 inches at the entry path, and is there any raised sill or interior lip [67]?
  • Is the seat height 17 or 18 inches, and what is the measured height from the finished floor [67]?
  • Where exactly are the three handles located, and what are their load ratings [67]?
  • What is the tested drain time from full bathing level to safe door-opening level under specified plumbing conditions [67]?
  • Does the package include a fast-fill faucet, dual drains, shower hardware, drain assembly, and overflow components [67]?
  • What are the written warranty terms for the tub shell, door seal, hardware, faucet, and drain components [71]?
  • Who is responsible for delivery damage, installation defects, leaks, and post-installation service [67]?
  • What are the total shipping, installation, remodeling, return, and restocking costs [67]?
  • Is the model currently available from the intended seller, and who is the seller of record [67]?
  • Can the buyer obtain a dimensioned installation drawing and confirm bathroom clearance, drain location, hot-water requirements, and caregiver transfer space [67]?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The AI consensus on HOROW WT52-L for High-Accessibility Bathing is mixed, not strong. Two of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, at an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best rank of 4. Fit ratings ranged from strong to uncertain across the seven platforms, with the spread driven by how much missing documentation each platform was willing to tolerate.

The strongest reason to consider it is value: a 5.5-inch threshold, an advertised ADA seat rated to 440 pounds, three handles, a handheld shower, and textured anti-slip flooring at a listed price typically between roughly $1,994 and $2,499 [73]. The main limitation is that the features most important to a severely mobility-limited buyer are the least documented: door-opening width, grab-bar placement and load ratings, drain time, seat height, and warranty terms [73].

Platform agreement here reflects repeated marketing and retail specifications, not independent verification of product quality. No independent slip-resistance, transfer-safety, or fall-outcome testing was identified in the reviewed evidence. Buyers who can clear 5.5 inches and want a compact, non-electric seated soaking tub at a low price have a reasonable candidate. Buyers who need verified ultra-low entry, documented transfer dimensions, or rapid drainage should compare against the alternatives named above before committing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from platform-reported fit research conducted on 2026-09-25 across seven AI platforms: anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity. Each platform evaluated HOROW WT52-L against the High-Accessibility Bathing use case and returned a fit rating, use-case findings, pricing and terms, limitations, and questions to verify before buying.

Ranking statistics reflect only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. Fit ratings and findings reflect all platforms that returned a fit assessment. Platform-reported research dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. The supplied source URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated at the writing stage.

Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in this evidence set. HOROW product pages, blog articles, and warranty pages account for the majority of cited claims, with retailer listings at Home Depot, Lowe's, and Wayfair providing the independent pricing and dimension checks. Company claims are labeled as such and are not described as independently verified.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply to this review. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being treated as current facts.

Critical accessibility specifications are not fully verified in public sources, including exact step-in threshold measurement, door-opening width, grab-bar placement, and slip-resistant flooring certification (perplexity:1, perplexity:3, perplexity:13). Drain speed and quick-drain claims were not independently confirmed [79].

Pricing is inconsistent across channels and the true all-in installed cost is not published [81]. Some source descriptions conflict on dimensions, so the exact footprint should be confirmed before purchase (perplexity:2, perplexity:3). Seat height conflicts between 17 and 18 inches across HOROW materials [81]. Warranty duration conflicts across one-year, two-year, and five-year references attached to different models or channels [82].

The manual implies professional electrical installation requirements that may increase total cost and complexity (perplexity:13, perplexity:14). No independent third-party testing, occupational therapy validation, or clinical evidence was identified demonstrating reduced falls, easier transfers, or superior accessibility for users with severe mobility limitations. Missing platform mentions during ranking are not evidence of rejection.

See the broader Limited Mobility consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Explore more walk in tubs guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

  • Meditub™ | Wheelchair Access Walk-In Bathtub (2953WCA Series) — Bathry: https://bathry.com/products/meditub-wheelchair-access-walk-in-bathtub-2953wca-series
  • HOROW 52.5-inch by 26.5-inch Left Drain Quick Fill Walk-in Soaking Bathtub: https://www.homedepot.com/p/333658716
  • The Complete 2026 Guide to Walk in Bathtubs for Seniors: https://www.seniorliving.org/walk-in-tubs/
  • HOROW 52.5'' X 26.5'' Walk-in Acrylic Bathtub With Shower Head: https://www.wayfair.com/home-improvement/pdp/horow-hrow1221.html
  • Additional AI research evidence84 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    22. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    23. AI research evidence record google:2.2.4
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    30. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    31. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    43. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    56. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    60. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    61. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    63. AI research evidence record deepseek:c6
    64. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    70. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    80. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13

Other Sources

  • Walk-In Tubs Wholesale Supplier for Safety and Comfort: https://horow-wholesale.com/collections/walk-in-tubs
  • HOROW 52.5 in. x 26.5 in. Left Drain Quick-Fill Walk-In Whirlpool Jetted Bathtub in White/Chrome WT52-LE: https://www.homedepot.com/p/HOROW-52-5-in-x-26-5-in-Left-Drain-Quick-Fill-Walk-In-Whirlpool-Jetted-Bathtub-in-White-Chrome-WT52-LE/335153562
  • Additional AI research evidence84 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    22. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    23. AI research evidence record google:2.2.4
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    30. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    31. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    43. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    56. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    60. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    61. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    63. AI research evidence record deepseek:c6
    64. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    70. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    80. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13

Verify This Research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
September 25, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
30
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#7

Research trail and source mix

Configured platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

8 independent · 18 company-owned · 4 unclear

Evidence support

23 direct · 6 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 627b6385d68537225573343b176e1ab9223511d401075e0bd66be57de6241f0a