Answer Capsule
The Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed Wi-Fi is a good fit for seniors and caregivers seeking keyless entry with remote management, temporary access codes, and a physical key backup. Six of seven AI platforms rated it "good" or "strong" for this use case; one rated it "uncertain" due to insufficient public evidence. Four of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 5.0 and a best rank of 2. The strongest reason to consider it: built-in Wi-Fi enables caregivers to remotely lock/unlock, issue up to 250 scheduled codes, and monitor activity without a separate hub. The main limitation: Wi-Fi operation significantly shortens battery life, with independent reports ranging from roughly 3 to 12 weeks, creating a maintenance burden for seniors who cannot easily replace four AA batteries.
Research Snapshot
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform mentions in ranking stage | 4 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, kimi) |
| Share of included platform responses | 57% (4 of 7) |
| Average listed rank | 5.0 |
| Best listed rank | 2 (deepseek, google) |
| Relevant product/model/plan | Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed with Wi-Fi (YRD430-WF1; also YRD410-WF1) |
| Overall use-case fit | Good (6 of 7 platforms); uncertain (1 of 7) |
| Research date | 2026-08-13 |
Why Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed Wi-Fi Qualified for This Study
The Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed Wi-Fi qualified because it directly addresses the core criteria for keyless entry and caregiver access: keypad entry, remote access via built-in Wi-Fi, temporary code management, battery-powered operation, physical key backup, and ANSI/BHMA Grade 2 security certification [1]. Four of seven AI platforms independently named it during the ranking discovery stage, and six of seven platforms that evaluated it for this use case rated it a good or strong fit (anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai). One platform (perplexity) rated it uncertain, citing insufficient public evidence for senior-specific features.
The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access
The most relevant product is the Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed with Wi-Fi, commonly identified as model YRD430-WF1 [4]. Anthropic also identified the related YRD410-WF1 keyed keypad model as part of the same family [8]. The lock uses four AA batteries, includes a physical key cylinder, and connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi without requiring a separate hub [9].
Important SKU conflict: Yale's current U.S. product page prominently lists the key-free variant YRD430-WF1-BSP, which has no keyway, while the evaluated entity is the keyed version. The exact U.S. SKU, included cylinder, current price, and stock status require confirmation before purchase [4].
What the AI Platforms Agreed About
Strong agreement: Remote caregiver access is a core strength
All seven platforms agreed that built-in Wi-Fi enables remote lock/unlock and status monitoring through the Yale Access app, which is essential for caregiver management [12]. The app supports remote control from anywhere, activity logs, and notifications of lock status changes [19].
Strong agreement: Temporary and scheduled codes are well-supported
Six platforms confirmed the ability to create temporary, recurring, or scheduled access codes for caregivers, family members, and service providers [12]. The lock supports up to 250 codes, with granular scheduling including time-of-day and day-of-week restrictions [20]. The Yale Access app provides Owner and Guest access levels with Always, Recurring, and Temporary schedules [17].
Strong agreement: Physical key backup is a key advantage
The keyed version includes a physical key cylinder, providing a non-app fallback if batteries fail or electronics malfunction [21]. This is particularly important for seniors who may forget codes or lose app connectivity. A 9V battery terminal also provides temporary emergency power if the AA batteries are depleted [25].
Strong agreement: Battery life is the primary limitation
All platforms flagged battery life as the main concern. Yale states up to approximately three months of Wi-Fi battery life [27], while independent testing reported approximately one to two months in some conditions [28]. Other independent sources report 6-9 months under normal usage [29], and some report batteries depleting in as little as 3 to 12 weeks depending on usage and network stability [30]. The Wi-Fi module significantly increases power consumption compared to Bluetooth-only operation [31].
Strong agreement: ANSI/BHMA Grade 2 security certification
Multiple platforms confirmed the lock meets ANSI/BHMA Grade 2 standards, indicating residential-grade durability and anti-kick-in strength [12]. The lock also carries an IPx5 weather rating and supports two-factor authentication [32].
Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain
Battery life estimates vary widely
Yale's official FAQ states up to approximately three months of Wi-Fi battery life [34]. Independent testing reported approximately one to two months in particular conditions [35]. Other independent reviews report 6-9 months under normal usage [36]. Google's sources report batteries depleting in as little as 3 to 12 weeks [38]. This is a significant factual conflict that buyers must resolve for their specific usage patterns.
App reliability is mixed
Consumer Reports noted early connectivity issues in the Assure Lock 2 generation [40]. More recent 2026 reviews report improved stability, though occasional app delays persist [41]. Independent testing reported variable response times and occasional sluggish or failed Wi-Fi unlock commands, including delays of up to approximately 10 seconds [35]. The Yale Access app lacks a built-in battery percentage indicator, showing only low-battery alerts [42].
Keypad readability is unclear
The keypad uses tactile pushbuttons rather than a touchscreen, which some sources say is easier for seniors with visual or dexterity limitations [44]. However, the numeric buttons are hidden until the keypad is tapped or the Yale logo is touched, which may disadvantage users unfamiliar with modern smart locks [45]. The touchscreen model is difficult to read in direct sunlight [45]. Keypad contrast, font size, and visibility in low light are not independently established [46].
Auto-lock safety concern
One recent review reports the auto-lock feature can trigger prematurely on partially closed doors, potentially creating security vulnerabilities if the door is not fully latched [47]. This contradicts marketing claims of safe auto-locking and requires verification.
Perplexity rated fit as uncertain
Perplexity rated the fit "uncertain," noting that the public evidence available was insufficient to verify senior-specific features, code-sharing limits, battery-life performance, and app simplicity for the exact model [48].
Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities
Keypad readability and ease of entry
The keyed Wi-Fi model uses a physical pushbutton keypad rather than a touchscreen. Yale lists keypad operation with backlit numbers that illuminate automatically in low light [51]. Independent testing found the keypad responsive with audible feedback and one-touch locking [52]. Tactile buttons may be easier for seniors with visual or motor challenges compared to smooth touchscreens [53]. However, readability for low vision is not independently established, and the hidden keypad design requires visual acuity to locate and activate [54].
Remote access reliability
Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote lock/unlock and status checks from anywhere via the Yale Access app without requiring a separate hub [51]. However, reliability depends on home Wi-Fi strength, and the lock requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, not 5 GHz [57]. Independent testing reported variable response times and occasional sluggish or failed unlock commands [58]. Early Consumer Reports testing noted connectivity issues [59].
Temporary caregiver codes
The Yale Access app supports creating and deleting temporary access codes for caregivers, with options for schedules for recurring access [51]. Codes can be permanent, recurring, or temporary, and can expire automatically [56]. The lock supports up to 250 codes [60]. Granular scheduling includes time-of-day and day-of-week restrictions, such as a dog walker code valid only 12 PM-2 PM weekdays [60]. However, one independent review noted scheduled codes may be limited to one time interval across selected days [58].
Battery life and maintenance
The lock uses four AA batteries [55]. Yale's Wi-Fi FAQ states up to approximately three months under typical conditions [63]. Independent testing reported substantially shorter life in some conditions, approximately one to two months [58]. Other sources report 6-9 months [64]. The Yale Access app lacks a battery percentage indicator, showing only low-battery alerts [65]. Apple HomeKit integration can display battery percentage if used [65].
Emergency key backup
The keyed version includes a physical key cylinder, providing a non-app fallback [67]. A 9V battery terminal can be held to the exterior of the lock to temporarily power it for emergency access [62]. The key-free variant relies solely on the 9V terminal, which is not the same as a physical key [67].
Installation ease
The lock replaces most standard U.S. deadbolts using a screwdriver and supports common door thicknesses and bore sizes [55]. Installation typically takes 20-40 minutes [70]. Yale provides paper templates and installation videos within the app [70]. Independent reviews note installation is straightforward but requires careful attention to door measurements and alignment [71]. Professional installation is recommended for users uncomfortable with DIY [71].
App simplicity and monitoring
The Yale Access app is described as simple and intuitive with four main tabs: Lock Access, Activity, Guest List, and Settings [72]. However, multiple reviewers note the app looks dated and lacks battery percentage indicators [66]. The app is generally praised for being accessible to users of varying technical abilities [72].
Security rating
The lock meets ANSI/BHMA Grade 2 standards [55]. It has an IPx5 weather rating and operates in temperatures from -30°C to 60°C [74]. Security features include two-factor authentication, encrypted wireless protocols, and matte keypads to prevent fingerprint smudges [74].
Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs
Known costs
| Cost Item | Amount | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Lock unit (Wi-Fi keypad models) | $240–$290 | Moderate |
| Yale U.S. page (key-free Wi-Fi keypad variant) | $259.99 | Moderate |
| Yale comparison section (keyed/key-free family) | $279.99 | Moderate |
| Additional physical keys | $3.99 per key | Moderate |
| Wi-Fi Smart Module (if purchased separately) | $80 | Moderate |
| Four AA replacement batteries | $5–$10 per set | High |
| Professional installation | Varies by region | Not specified |
Pricing sources: [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81].
Subscription and contract terms
No mandatory Yale monthly subscription was identified for the listed lock functions [76]. The Yale Access app is free with purchase [80]. No service contract or cancellation term was identified [76]. Yale lists a 30-day return policy and a 2-year electronics warranty on the cited product page [76]. Google's sources report a 1-year limited warranty on electronics and a lifetime limited warranty on finish and mechanical parts [78]. These warranty terms conflict and should be verified.
Additional fees
Taxes and shipping charges may apply; Yale advertises free standard shipping over $50 on its U.S. shop page [76]. Optional keyed-alike service is listed at $3.99 per lock [76]. Home internet and compatible smart-home hub costs may apply if used [76].
Best Suited For
- Seniors who want both keypad access and a traditional physical key — the keyed configuration provides a non-app fallback [82]
- Caregivers who need remote lock management and temporary access codes — built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control and up to 250 scheduled codes [85]
- Multigenerational households with reliable 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi — the lock supports rotating care schedules and multiple family members [87]
- Users with existing smart home ecosystems — compatible with Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Apple HomeKit [88]
- Seniors with vision or motor challenges who benefit from tactile pushbuttons — physical buttons may be easier than smooth touchscreens [84]
Probably Not Best Suited For
- Seniors who need very long battery intervals and cannot easily replace AA batteries — Wi-Fi operation can deplete batteries in as little as 3 to 12 weeks [89]
- Buyers who require consistently fast remote unlocking under weak or unreliable Wi-Fi — independent testing reported delays of up to approximately 10 seconds [91]
- Seniors with poor Wi-Fi connectivity or frequent internet outages — the lock requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, and remote features depend on network strength [92]
- Users seeking large, high-contrast, exceptionally readable buttons or a biometric option — keypad readability for low vision is not independently established [93]
- Seniors without smartphone comfort or family tech support — full functionality requires app-based management [94]
When Another Option May Be Better
- Choose a Bluetooth, Z-Wave, or hub-based configuration when battery life and local operation matter more than built-in Wi-Fi convenience [96]. Matter versions are expected to improve battery life per Consumer Reports [97].
- Choose a touchscreen or fingerprint model when the senior prefers larger touch controls or biometric entry, such as the Yale Assure Lock 2 Touch or Eufy Smart Lock C220 [98].
- Choose a lock with longer battery life and Thread support such as the Schlage Encode Plus when battery maintenance is a primary concern [100].
- Choose a basic electronic deadbolt with a simple keypad when the senior has no smartphone support and needs the simplest possible operation [101].
- Choose a lock with more granular scheduling such as the Schlage Encode Plus when frequent or complex access schedules are needed [102].
- Choose a lock with simpler installation such as the Level Lock when professional installation is required [103].
Questions to Verify Before Buying
- Is the exact U.S. model YRD430-WF1 currently available, and does it include a physical key cylinder and at least one key? Yale's current U.S. page prominently lists the key-free YRD430-WF1-BSP variant [104].
- What is the current delivered price, including tax, shipping, and any installation? Pricing ranges from $240 to $290 depending on retailer [105].
- Does the lock support the caregiver's required code schedules, including different windows on different weekdays? One review noted scheduled codes may be limited to one time interval across selected days [107].
- Can caregivers receive reliable lock, unlock, door-ajar, low-battery, and failed-entry notifications? Independent testing reported variable notification reliability [107].
- What happens to existing codes and remote access if Wi-Fi or Yale cloud service is unavailable? Local codes should still work, but this should be confirmed [108].
- How often should batteries realistically be replaced at this home's traffic level and temperature? Estimates range from 3 weeks to 9 months [109].
- Is the keypad legible for the senior's eyesight, including at night and in direct sunlight? Keypad readability is not independently established [104].
- Does the door meet Yale's thickness, bore, backset, alignment, and deadbolt requirements? Installation requires careful door measurement [111].
- Is there a local or professional fallback plan if the app, keypad, batteries, or Wi-Fi fails? The physical key provides a backup, but it must be stored securely [112].
- What warranty exclusions, return requirements, and support procedures apply to the exact keyed SKU? Warranty terms conflict between sources [104].
Final AI Consensus Verdict
The Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed Wi-Fi is a good fit for seniors and caregivers seeking keyless entry with remote management, temporary access codes, and a physical key backup. Six of seven AI platforms rated it "good" or "strong" for this use case; one rated it "uncertain" due to insufficient public evidence. The lock's core strengths — built-in Wi-Fi remote access, up to 250 scheduled codes, activity tracking, tactile pushbuttons, and physical key backup — directly address the keyless entry and caregiver access use case. Its principal tradeoffs are Wi-Fi-related battery consumption, mixed independent evidence on remote responsiveness, and uncertainty about the currently available keyed U.S. SKU and price. It is strongest when a caregiver can monitor batteries and the home has dependable 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; a lower-power hub-based lock may be better when maintenance simplicity is paramount [113].
For a broader comparison of smart locks for this use case, see the Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access consensus index. You can also browse other home safety topics.
How This Review Was Produced
This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, perplexity), each of which evaluated the Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed Wi-Fi against the category criteria for keyless entry and caregiver access. The research date is 2026-08-13. Platform responses were analyzed for agreement, disagreement, and use-case-specific findings. Citations were mapped to the supplied source catalog, and factual claims are attributed to their original sources. The review does not claim personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification beyond the supplied sources.
Methodology Limitations
- Platform-reported research dates differ: DeepSeek's response is dated 2026-04-12, while the authoritative run date is 2026-08-13. This discrepancy is disclosed as provenance metadata and does not independently prove freshness.
- Platform mentions vs. evaluations: All seven platforms evaluated fit, but only four platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, kimi) named the entity during ranking discovery. The remaining three platforms (grok, openai, perplexity) evaluated it without naming it in the ranking stage.
- SKU conflict unresolved: The exact U.S. keyed SKU (YRD430-WF1) could not be confirmed against Yale's current product page, which prominently lists the key-free YRD430-WF1-BSP variant.
- Battery life estimates conflict: Yale's official estimate (up to 3 months) conflicts with independent reports ranging from 3 weeks to 9 months. Buyers must verify for their specific usage patterns.
- Supplied URLs not independently validated: The URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
- No independent verification of senior-specific outcomes: The cited sources do not independently verify long-term caregiver outcomes, accessibility compliance, or resistance to all forms of attack.
- AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality: Agreement among platforms reflects consensus in the supplied evidence, not independent verification of product performance.
Explore more home safety guidance in the category directory.
Sources
Company-Owned Sources
- Keyless Entry Lock & Keypads | How It Works: https://august.com/pages/keyless-entry
- Meet the Yale Assure Lock® 2 | Best Smart Lock for your Home - Yale Home: https://shopyalehome.com/pages/yale-assure-lock-2
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Key-Free Keypad with Wi-Fi: https://shopyalehome.com/products/yale-assure-lock-2-key-free-keypad-with-wi-fi
- FAQ: Yale Assure Lock 2 with Wi-Fi: https://support.shopyalehome.com/yale-assure-lock-2-with-wi-fi-faq-B1q1o8M5q
- Yale Home official website: https://www.yalehome.com/in/en
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed with Wi-Fi Product Page: https://www.yalehome.com/in/en/products/smart-locks/assure-lock-2-keyed-wifi
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Family BLE Product Sheet: https://www.yalehome.com/us/en/documents/product-sheets/assure-lock-2-family-ble-product-sheet.pdf
Additional AI research evidence118 records
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
- AI research evidence record google:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record google:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
- AI research evidence record kimi:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record google:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
- AI research evidence record kimi:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record grok:c2
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c3
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record google:c5
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record grok:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c2
Independent Sources
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Review: The Smart Lock That Finally Gets Keys Right: https://bikmantech.com/blogs/blogs/yale-assure-lock-2-everything-you-need-to-know
- Eufy Smart Lock C220 Review & Specs: https://smarthomecompared.com/door-locks/eufy-smart-lock-c220
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Smart Lock Features and Activity Monitoring: https://smarthomewizards.com/yale-assure-lock-2-review/
- Yale Assure Lock 2: Is Yale Assure Lock 2 Worth Buying?: https://smartzenhome.com/yale-smart-lock-review/
- Yale Assure Lock Not Working? 8 Fixes - Swift Key San Diego: https://swiftkeysandiego.com/blog/yale-assure-lock-problems
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Review: A Game-Changer in Home Security: https://woosmarthome.com/yale-assure-lock-2/
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Smart Lock Keyless Wi-Fi Deadbolt Review: https://www.bestbuy.com/site/reviews/yale-assure-lock-2-smart-lock-keyless-wi-fi-deadbolt-with-apple-home-keys--touchscreen-keypad-access-satin-nickel/6563954
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Review: https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/yale-assure-lock-2-review
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Review - Consumer Reports: https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/door-locks/yale-assure-lock-2-smart-lock-review-a8409871680/
- How to improve Yale Assure Lock 2 battery life - Digital Trends: https://www.digitaltrends.com/home/how-to-improve-yale-assure-lock-2-battery-life/
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Key-Free Keypad with Wi-Fi: https://www.homecontrols.com/Yale-Assure-Lock-2-Key-Free-Keypad-Wi-Fi-YAYRD430WFIx
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Key-Free Touchscreen with Wi-Fi: https://www.homecontrols.com/Yale-Assure-Lock-2-Key-Free-Touchscreen-Wi-Fi-YAYRD450WFIx
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyed Deadbolt with Wi-Fi Keypad: https://www.homecontrols.com/Yale-Assure-Lock-2-Keypad-Wi-Fi-YAYRD410WFIx
- Home Depot Yale Assure Lock 2 Customer Reviews: https://www.homedepot.com/p/reviews/Yale-Assure-Lock-2-Smart-Door-Lock-with-Wi-Fi-and-Pushbutton-Keypad-Black-Suede-YRD410-WF1-BSP/330842273/1
- Yale Assure Lock 2; Keyless Smart Door Lock with Bluetooth and Pushbutton Keypad, Satin Nickel YRD430-BLE-619 - The Home Depot: https://www.homedepot.com/p/Yale-Assure-Lock-2-Keyless-Smart-Door-Lock-with-Bluetooth-and-Pushbutton-Keypad-Satin-Nickel-YRD430-BLE-619/322081827
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Review: https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/yale-assure-lock-2
- Yale Assure Lock SL Touchscreen Deadbolt Review: https://www.safeathomeguides.com/products/door-access/yale-assure-lock-sl-touchscreen
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Touch with Wi-Fi review: Pretty, but problematic: https://www.techhive.com/article/2103177/yale-assure-lock-2-touch-with-wi-fi-smart-lock-review.html
- Yale Assure Lock 2 review: A generic but reliable smart lock that gets you in and out: https://www.techradar.com/reviews/yale-assure-lock-2
- Yale Assure Lock 2 review: https://www.tomsguide.com/reviews/yale-assure-lock-2
- Yale Assure Lock 2, Black Suede, Smart Wi-Fi Keypad for Key-Free Entry: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Yale-Assure-Lock-2-Black-Suede-Smart-Wi-Fi-Keypad-for-Key-Free-Entry-YRD430-WF1-BSP/1525381058
- Yale Assure Lock 2 Keyless Smart WiFi Lock Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tP5xOysntKk
Additional AI research evidence118 records
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
- AI research evidence record google:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record google:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
- AI research evidence record kimi:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record google:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
- AI research evidence record kimi:c4
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record grok:c2
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c3
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record google:c5
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c5
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record grok:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:c1
- AI research evidence record google:c3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c2
Verify this research
Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.
- Study date
- Aug 13, 2026
- Platforms analyzed
- 7
- Source records
- 30
- Ranking mentions
- 4 of 7
- Platform share
- 57%
- Final consensus rank
- #1
Research trail and source mix
Platforms
openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google
Source mix
22 independent · 8 company-owned
Evidence support
23 direct · 6 partial
Important limitation
Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
Source snapshot SHA-256 6735932e0cf52b4362a22ee5f71cd3cdfc32ddf2868b24729d5177b097d63520
