AI Consensus Fit Review

Medical Alert Basic In-Home System Review for In-Home Base Station Coverage

Medical Alert Basic In-Home System is a good fit for a senior who stays mostly inside a typical single-story home and needs simple, professionally monitored emergency response, provided an approximately 800-foot wearable range is enough and either a landline or reliable cellular signal is available.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
AI Consensus Fit Review research report illustration
Independent AI consensus researchWe compare multiple AI platforms to surface agreement, disagreement, and buyer-specific tradeoffs.

Answer Capsule

Medical Alert Basic In-Home System is a good fit for a senior who stays mostly inside a typical single-story home and needs simple, professionally monitored emergency response, provided an approximately 800-foot wearable range is enough and either a landline or reliable cellular signal is available. Two of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, at an average listed rank of 5.0 and a best rank of 4. The strongest reason to consider it is independently reported monitoring performance: AARP testers recorded quick response times, strong two-way speaker quality, and easy setup [1]. The main limitation is range: the roughly 800-foot figure is shorter than competitors publishing 1,300 to 1,400 feet [2].

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 platforms (anthropic, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank5.0
Best listed rank4
Relevant product/model/planMedical Alert Home System / Basic in-home system, including landline and cellular variants where available
Overall use-case fitGood (openai, deepseek, google, grok, perplexity); Mixed (anthropic, kimi)
Research date2026-09-27

Why Medical Alert Basic In-Home System Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Medical Alert Basic In-Home System qualify for this in-home base station coverage study?
  • How many AI platforms named Medical Alert Basic In-Home System during the ranking stage?

Medical Alert Basic In-Home System qualified because it cleared the study's minimum-mention threshold and because all seven included platforms returned a fit assessment for it, even though only two named it during ranking discovery. The ranking stage counted two naming platforms, anthropic at rank 6 and perplexity at rank 4, for an average listed rank of 5.0 and a best rank of 4. That 28.6% share is below half of included platform responses, so this is a qualified finalist rather than a consensus leader.

The entity also matched the study's category criteria directly: it is an in-home base station plus wearable help button sold with landline and cellular connection options, which maps onto the base station range, pendant range, landline/cellular setup, two-way speaker, backup battery, fall-detection add-on, and monitoring-center criteria used to screen candidates. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-09-27: anthropic reported 2026-01-01 and deepseek reported 2026-05-16, while google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-27. Those dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to In-Home Base Station Coverage

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Medical Alert Basic In-Home System plan is most relevant for in-home base station coverage across the house and yard?
  • Is the Medical Alert Home System Cellular or the Basic landline system the better choice for a senior without a landline?

The most relevant configuration is the Medical Alert Home System, sold in a landline variant and a cellular variant, with the cellular version marketed as needing no landline [5]. Platform naming of the underlying plan is inconsistent, which is itself a finding: openai, deepseek, grok, and perplexity all list "Basic in-home system," "Basic landline system," and "Home System Cellular" as candidate labels, while google describes the lineup as "Medical Alert Home System (Cellular or Landline options)." The exact distinction between those labels was not confirmed from an accessible current official product page.

The cellular Home System page states up to 800 feet of coverage, up to 30-hour backup battery, a built-in two-way speaker, and monthly or annual plans with no long-term commitment on the monthly plan [5]. Google's retrieved official-site excerpts describe the Home System as providing "24/7 access to help in and around the home — no landline needed" and state that with home systems the user speaks into the two-way speaker on the base unit itself, not the help button [7]. That base-unit-only voice design matters for this use case: a senior at the far end of the coverage radius can trigger an alarm but must be near the base station to hold a conversation.

One conflict should be flagged rather than resolved. Kimi reported that a SafeWise comparison table lists Medical Alert as having "No" landline option, which contradicts the landline variant described by other platforms (kimi:safewise_range_comparison). It is unclear whether the landline tier was discontinued, whether the table refers to a specific plan tier, or whether the table contains an error. Buyers who specifically need a landline configuration should confirm availability before ordering.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Medical Alert Basic In-Home System for in-home base station coverage?
  • Is Medical Alert Basic In-Home System worth it for a senior who wants monitored coverage inside the house?

Five of seven platforms rated the entity a good fit for this use case (openai, deepseek, google, grok, perplexity), and two rated it mixed (anthropic, kimi). The agreement clusters around four points.

First, connection flexibility. Multiple platforms report that Medical Alert offers both a landline-based in-home system and a cellular in-home system, giving buyers a choice depending on home infrastructure [8].

Second, monitoring is professionally staffed and available around the clock. Medical Alert states the Home System gives access to trained response specialists 24/7/365 [12]. NCOA reported that Medical Alert's monitoring-center staff are EMT/EMD certified [13]. AARP's independent testing reported quick response times and high scores for operator professionalism [14]. These findings support the monitoring service but do not guarantee response performance for every call or location.

Third, fall detection is a paid add-on priced at $10 per month. Medical Alert's own fall-detection page states the $10 monthly add-on [15], and Google's retrieved official excerpt states fall detection can be added to any Medical Alert plan for $10 per month [16]. Forbes separately reported an additional $10 per month for fall detection [17]. The company also discloses that fall detection does not detect 100% of all falls and that users should always push the button when they need help (official:C1).

Fourth, the system is explicitly in-home protection, not off-property coverage. Medical Alert distinguishes its in-home system from its mobile system for broader coverage [18].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is the real pendant range of Medical Alert Basic In-Home System, and do AI platforms agree on it?
  • How long does the Medical Alert Basic In-Home System backup battery last during a power outage?

Range is the sharpest disagreement, and it is material to this use case. AARP's independent testing reported approximately 800 feet of wearable range between the Home System base unit and help button [19], and Forbes reported the home system can detect activation up to 800 feet from the monitoring unit [20]. Google's retrieved official excerpts state the home system offers up to 800 feet of coverage from the base and that help buttons have an 800-foot range [21]. Grok reported the same 800-foot figure [23]. But anthropic reported that official ADT documentation states the pendant must be within 150 feet of the base station, and that older marketing described a 300-foot range [24]. Anthropic's own uncertainty note says the discrepancy appears to conflate base-station-to-base-station range with pendant-to-base-station range. This review cannot resolve that conflict; buyers should treat the effective range as unverified until the vendor confirms it in writing for the exact configuration being ordered.

Backup battery life is also inconsistent. Medical Alert's Home System cellular page states up to 30 hours [26], and Google's retrieved official excerpt repeats the 30-hour figure [27]. Grok reported 30 hours [23]. Perplexity flagged that an independent review source reports 36 hours, so the exact figure is not fully consistent across sources [28]. Anthropic reported a 20-hour backup battery for the Basic tier specifically [24], while kimi reported 30 hours (kimi:safewise_range_comparison). Openai stated that base-station backup-battery duration was not found in the reviewed sources at all (openai). The honest summary: 30 hours is the most frequently repeated figure, but it is not unanimous and the Basic tier may differ.

Pricing is the third conflict zone. Medical Alert states systems start at $29.95 per month and that prices vary by system, rate plan, and add-ons [29]. Google's retrieved official excerpt repeats the $29.95 starting figure [30]. Grok reported $29.95 per month on annual prepay and $37.95 per month monthly, plus a $99.95 one-time equipment fee [23]. Kimi reported $37.95 per month as the lowest price in a comparison table (kimi:safewise_range_comparison). Openai reported historical pricing beginning at $19.95 per month [31] and NCOA reported a $27.95 to $47.95 range [32]. The ranking stage estimated approximately $34.95 per month or higher for Home System Cellular. These figures span different dates, plans, and billing cycles, and openai explicitly rated pricing confidence as low.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • Does the Medical Alert Basic In-Home System pendant have a speaker for two-way voice, or must the senior reach the base station?
  • How much does fall detection cost to add to Medical Alert Basic In-Home System?

Two-way voice runs through the base station, not the pendant. Google's retrieved official excerpt states that with home systems the user speaks into the two-way speaker on the base unit itself, not the help button [33]. Anthropic reported the same limitation: the pendant cannot be used for two-way communication, and all voice interaction requires reaching the base station (anthropic). AARP's independent testing rated the Home System positively for its two-way speaker and audio quality, but that source does not establish performance in every room, at maximum range, or during power or network outages [34].

Fall detection is an add-on, not standard. Medical Alert states fall detection adds $10 per month [35], and Google's retrieved official excerpt confirms the $10 monthly add-on [36]. Anthropic reported that fall detection is unavailable on the Basic tier and requires upgrading to Medical Alert Plus at $39.99 per month plus an $11 monthly fall-detection fee [37]. That directly conflicts with the company's "any plan" wording. Buyers should confirm in writing whether fall detection can be attached to the exact plan they are ordering.

Caregiver visibility is a documented plus. Google's retrieved official excerpt describes the Medical Alert Connect app as free for caregivers to monitor battery status and receive real-time notifications [38]. Openai noted that the official Basic Protection Plan costs $5 per month, covers standard landline and cellular systems, provides limited replacement coverage, and may be canceled at any time [39]. That is an optional protection plan, not the monitoring fee.

Waterproofing is disclosed with limits. The company states help buttons are waterproof up to one meter of water for 30 minutes and that mobile system speaker units are water-resistant (official:C1). Anthropic reported a waterproof pendant and wristband suitable for in-home use including bathrooms [40].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Medical Alert Basic In-Home System cost per month, and are there setup or activation fees?
  • Is Medical Alert Basic In-Home System month-to-month, and what happens to the equipment if the buyer cancels?

Current pricing is not consistent across public sources, and this review rates pricing confidence as low. The most frequently repeated company figure is a $29.95 per month starting point, with prices varying by system, rate plan, and add-ons [41]. Grok reported $29.95 per month on annual prepay versus $37.95 per month monthly, plus a $99.95 one-time equipment fee and $10 per month for optional fall detection [43]. Kimi reported $37.95 per month as the lowest listed price (kimi:safewise_range_comparison). Openai reported historical home pricing beginning at $19.95 per month with fall detection an additional $10 per month [44], and NCOA reported a $27.95 to $47.95 monthly range [45]. The ranking stage estimated approximately $34.95 per month or higher for Home System Cellular.

One-time fees are disputed. Google's retrieved independent review excerpt notes some reviewers encountered a $99.95 programming fee and $24.95 shipping fee [46]. The company's own disclaimer states free shipping is available only on semi-annual and annual plans and a free lockbox only on annual plans, and that promotional pricing applies only to new customers who then pay the regular monthly fee after the promotional period [47]. Anthropic reported a $99 activation fee and an annual effective rate of $29.99 per month (anthropic). Perplexity reported that independent reviews cite one-time equipment or activation fees around $99.95 but that the current product page in the gathered evidence does not clearly confirm that fee for this exact plan (perplexity).

Contract terms are comparatively clear. Medical Alert states the monthly plan is month-to-month with no long-term commitment [48]. Google's retrieved official excerpt states cancellation is allowed at any time without a fee but users must return all leased equipment to Medical Alert's return facility [49]. Anthropic reported that ADT reimburses unused days in the billing cycle upon cancellation and that a lifetime warranty covers device damage but excludes lost devices (anthropic). The official Basic Protection Plan document states a $5 monthly fee, coverage for standard landline and cellular systems, limited replacement coverage, and cancellation rights [50]. Monitoring-plan contract length, notice requirements, refund policy, and price-increase policy for the exact Basic in-home monitoring plan were not verified.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Medical Alert Basic In-Home System best for in an in-home base station coverage use case?
  • Is Medical Alert Basic In-Home System a good choice for a senior in a typical single-story home with a landline?

It is best suited to a senior who spends most of the day inside a typical single-story home or apartment and wants simple, professionally monitored emergency response rather than a self-monitored device. The approximately 800-foot reported range covers many ordinary homes and modest yards [51]. AARP testers found the Home System straightforward to set up, with few controls and a simple wearable help button [51].

It also suits households that want a choice between landline and cellular connectivity, since both configurations are reported publicly [54]. Buyers who value caregiver visibility may benefit from the free Medical Alert Connect app for battery status and real-time notifications [58]. Buyers who want professional two-way emergency communication rather than a self-monitored device are also in scope, with the caveat that voice runs through the base station, not the pendant [59].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Medical Alert Basic In-Home System for in-home base station coverage?
  • Is Medical Alert Basic In-Home System a poor fit for a large home or a property with a big yard?

It is probably not the best choice for large homes, multi-acre yards, or properties with substantial obstructions. The approximately 800-foot reported range is shorter than some competing in-home systems, and an independent 2026 comparison identified Medical Alert's roughly 800-foot home range as shorter than competitors offering more than 1,300 feet [60]. Google's retrieved official excerpts cite LifeFone at up to 1,300 feet and Medical Guardian Home Cellular at 1,400 feet [61]. Kimi reported that a home-size guide recommends 800 to 1,000 feet minimum for large single-story homes and 1,000 feet for two-story homes (kimi:safeeldercare_home_size_guide).

It is also a weak fit for buyers who need verified protection outside the home, since the system is explicitly in-home protection and the mobile system is the off-property option [63]. Buyers who need to speak through the wearable device rather than return to the base station should look elsewhere [64]. And buyers unwilling to confirm current pricing, fall-detection fees, cellular coverage, and backup-battery specifications before purchase should treat this as a poor fit, because those details are inconsistent across sources (openai, perplexity, kimi:safewise_range_comparison).

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Medical Alert Basic In-Home System for a buyer who needs more than 800 feet of range?
  • When should a buyer choose a mobile GPS system instead of Medical Alert Basic In-Home System?

Another option may be better in four situations. First, when the senior regularly uses a large yard or detached structures: choose a competitor with a verified range above 1,300 feet (openai). Google's retrieved official excerpts cite LifeFone at up to 1,300 feet with optional fall detection at $5 per month and Medical Guardian Home Cellular at 1,400 feet [65]. Kimi reported Bay Alarm Medical SOS Home at $34.95 per month with a 1,000-foot range and 32-hour backup battery (kimi:medgrade_bayalarm).

Second, when the senior drives, walks outside the property, or needs away-from-home coverage: choose a mobile GPS system instead [67].

Third, when published battery runtime, current pricing, and contract terms are purchase-critical: choose a provider with clearly published figures, because Medical Alert's backup-battery duration and current pricing were not consistently verified (openai, perplexity, kimi:safewise_range_comparison).

Fourth, when local cellular coverage is weak or unreliable: consider a landline-capable alternative, and confirm whether the Medical Alert landline tier is still offered given the conflicting SafeWise table entry (openai, kimi:safewise_range_comparison).

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Medical Alert before signing up for the Basic In-Home System?
  • Does the Medical Alert Basic In-Home System pendant work from the farthest point in the yard?

Confirm the exact current monthly price for the landline configuration and the Home System Cellular configuration in the buyer's ZIP code, since published figures range from $19.95 to $47.95 per month across sources and the ranking stage estimated approximately $34.95 or higher for cellular [68]. Ask whether equipment, activation, programming, shipping, annual, or early-cancellation fees apply, given the reported $99.95 programming fee and $24.95 shipping fee in one independent review and the company's statement that free shipping applies only to semi-annual and annual plans [70].

Confirm the guaranteed or tested pendant range in the buyer's specific home, yard, and construction type, and whether the pendant works from the farthest intended outdoor location including garages, basements, porches, and detached structures (openai). Ask for the base-station backup-battery duration in writing for both landline and cellular versions, because sources report 20, 30, and 36 hours [71].

Confirm the exact fall-detection surcharge and whether fall detection is available with the selected pendant or only a separate device, since the company states $10 per month on any plan while anthropic reported it is unavailable on the Basic tier [74]. Ask which cellular network the system uses and whether coverage can be tested at the residence before committing. Confirm whether the monitoring plan is month-to-month, what the cancellation, refund, and price-increase terms are, and what equipment must be returned [72]. Ask what response-center certifications, redundancy, outage procedures, and average response metrics apply to this specific plan, and whether two-way communication continues during a power, landline, or cellular outage (openai).

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Medical Alert Basic In-Home System is a good fit for In-Home Base Station Coverage in a typical single-story home, and a mixed fit for larger properties or yard-heavy use. Five of seven platforms rated it good for this use case; two rated it mixed. The strongest evidence is independent: AARP testers reported approximately 800 feet of wearable range, strong two-way speaker performance, easy setup, and quick response times [78], and NCOA reported EMT/EMD-certified monitoring staff [79]. The clearest limitation is range relative to competitors publishing 1,300 to 1,400 feet [80], compounded by unresolved conflicts on pendant range, backup battery duration, and current pricing. Buyers who stay inside a modest home, have a working landline or reliable cellular signal, and verify pricing and battery specifications in writing before ordering will find this a reasonable choice. Buyers who need yard coverage, verified long-range performance, or fully transparent current pricing should compare alternatives first. For the broader category picture, see the In-Home Base Station Coverage consensus index, and browse the full medical alert systems directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a fixed research run dated 2026-09-27 covering seven AI platforms: anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity. Each platform returned a fit assessment, use-case findings, pricing and terms, limitations, and questions to verify for Medical Alert Basic In-Home System specifically for the In-Home Base Station Coverage use case. Two of seven platforms named the entity during the ranking stage, which is the basis for the 28.6% share figure. All included platforms evaluated fit, but platform_mentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed for this review.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: anthropic reported 2026-01-01 and deepseek reported 2026-05-16, while the remaining platforms reported 2026-09-27. Those dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. Deepseek ran with search disabled, so its findings are platform-reported rather than retrieved. Official Medical Alert product pages were not accessible through one research tool, so current product specifications and checkout pricing could not be fully verified. Public pricing is inconsistent, ranging from $19.95 to $47.95 per month across sources, and the ranking-stage estimate of approximately $34.95 per month or higher for cellular was not independently confirmed. The exact distinction between the labels "Basic in-home system," "Basic landline system," and "Home System Cellular" was not confirmed from an accessible current official product page. Base-station backup-battery duration was not found in some reviewed sources and conflicts across others. Independent range and testing results may apply to the current Home System generally rather than every Basic configuration. One platform reported that a comparison table lists Medical Alert as having no landline option, which conflicts with other platform descriptions. Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions and that no failed fetch was used as a verified domain key, and that company-name variants were collapsed onto one canonical brand before minimum-mentions qualification. AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality.

Explore more medical alert systems guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • At-Home Landline | Medical Alert System - LifeFone: https://www.lifefone.com/
  • Medical Alert Official Website: https://www.medicalalert.com/
  • Mobile vs. In-Home Medical Alert Systems: Which Is Right for You?: https://www.medicalalert.com/blog/gps-or-in-home-medical-alert-system-which-is-right-for-you/
  • Automatic Fall Detection - Medical Alert: https://www.medicalalert.com/fall-detection/
  • Medical Alert Home System | No Landline Needed: https://www.medicalalert.com/product/home-system-cellular/
  • MGHome Cellular - Medical Alert System: https://www.medicalguardian.com/
  • Official pricing and terms source: https://www.medicalalert.com/terms-and-conditions/
  • Additional AI research evidence82 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    4. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    5. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    7. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    10. AI research evidence record grok:web:6
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    12. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:4.2.1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    18. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    19. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    21. AI research evidence record google:3.1.1
    22. AI research evidence record google:3.1.7
    23. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    28. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    29. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    30. AI research evidence record google:2.1.8
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    33. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    36. AI research evidence record google:4.2.1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    38. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    42. AI research evidence record google:2.1.8
    43. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    46. AI research evidence record google:4.2.4
    47. AI research evidence record google:4.2.2
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    49. AI research evidence record google:4.2.7
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    53. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    54. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    55. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    56. AI research evidence record grok:web:6
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    59. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    61. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    62. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    63. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    64. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    65. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    67. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    70. AI research evidence record google:4.2.4
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    72. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    73. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    74. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    75. AI research evidence record google:4.2.1
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    77. AI research evidence record google:4.2.7
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    81. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    82. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • island medical alert systems, llc company page: https://linkedin.com/company/island-medical-alert-systems
  • Additional AI research evidence82 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    4. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    5. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    7. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    10. AI research evidence record grok:web:6
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    12. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:4.2.1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    18. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    19. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    21. AI research evidence record google:3.1.1
    22. AI research evidence record google:3.1.7
    23. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    28. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    29. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    30. AI research evidence record google:2.1.8
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    33. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    36. AI research evidence record google:4.2.1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    38. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    42. AI research evidence record google:2.1.8
    43. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    46. AI research evidence record google:4.2.4
    47. AI research evidence record google:4.2.2
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    49. AI research evidence record google:4.2.7
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    53. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    54. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    55. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    56. AI research evidence record grok:web:6
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    59. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    61. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    62. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    63. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    64. AI research evidence record google:3.4.2
    65. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    67. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    70. AI research evidence record google:4.2.4
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    72. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    73. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    74. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    75. AI research evidence record google:4.2.1
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    77. AI research evidence record google:4.2.7
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    81. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    82. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7

Verify This Research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
September 27, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
27
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#10

Research trail and source mix

Configured platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

16 independent · 10 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

19 direct · 8 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 803e6d03ba5fda6b3b46a028d1bd1c9fc24c9bc4b5507658fa8956ad2bee80c5