AI Consensus Fit Review

Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip for Seniors Seeking Basic Mobile Phones - AI Consensus Fit Review

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is a good fit for non-tech-savvy seniors who primarily need reliable calling and texting without smartphone complexity.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip for Seniors Seeking Basic Mobile Phones hero image
senior-technologyPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is a good fit for non-tech-savvy seniors who primarily need reliable calling and texting without smartphone complexity. Three of seven platforms (43%) named it in the ranking stage, with all three ranking it #1. The strongest reason to consider it is the combination of a $59 device price, large backlit physical keys, dual 2.8-inch displays, M4/T4 hearing-aid compatibility, and a $20/month unlimited talk-and-text plan with 1GB data. The main limitation is the lack of verified voice-to-text capability, a 7-hour talk-time battery, and uncertainty about whether the first-generation model is being replaced by the newer IRIS Easy Flip 2. Two platforms rated fit as uncertain due to unverifiable specifications, and no platform confirmed a dedicated physical emergency button with 24/7 monitoring.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (43%)
Platforms naming entityanthropic, grok, perplexity
Average listed rank1.0
Best listed rank1
Fit ratings4 good, 1 strong, 2 uncertain
Relevant product/planIRIS Easy Flip + Consumer Cellular Basic 1GB plan at $20/month
Overall use-case fitGood
Research date2026-08-11

Why Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip Qualified for This Study

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip qualified for this study because it appeared in the ranking stage for best simple cell phones for seniors across multiple AI platforms. Three of seven platforms (anthropic, grok, and perplexity) named it during ranking discovery, and all three ranked it #1. The phone was evaluated against category criteria including interface simplicity, high-contrast display readability, physical button size, speaker volume, dedicated emergency button, and plan pricing.

The entity was assessed as a phone model and network provider combination: the IRIS Easy Flip handset paired with Consumer Cellular wireless service, specifically the Basic 1GB plan at $20/month or the Unlimited Talk & Text + 1GB data plan.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Basic & Simplified Mobile Phones

The most relevant configuration is the IRIS Easy Flip first-generation flip phone with Consumer Cellular Unlimited Talk & Text plus 1GB high-speed data plan at $20/month [1]. This pairing was consistently recommended across platforms for the stated use case of non-tech-savvy seniors seeking reliable calling and texting.

Key product specifications reported across sources include:

  • Dual 2.8-inch QVGA displays (internal and external) [3]
  • Backlit keypad with large letters and raised, well-separated buttons [5]
  • M4/T4 hearing-aid compatibility rating [7]
  • 2000 mAh battery with 7 hours talk time and up to 14 days standby [9]
  • 5MP camera, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, expandable storage up to 128GB [11]
  • Pre-installed eSIM with QR code activation [12]
  • SOS/emergency contacts capability [13]

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement existed on the phone's physical design and affordability. Five of seven platforms rated the fit as "good" or "strong," with only two rating it "uncertain" due to verification gaps. The platforms unanimously agreed on several core strengths:

Large physical buttons and display readability. Multiple platforms cited the backlit keypad with large, well-separated, raised buttons as a major advantage for seniors with vision or dexterity concerns [15]. The dual 2.8-inch displays, including an external screen for caller ID and notifications without opening the phone, were consistently praised [18].

Affordable pricing. The $59 device price and $20/month plan with unlimited talk/text plus 1GB data were cited by multiple platforms as among the lowest-cost options in the senior flip-phone market [21]. The phone was described as $20 cheaper than the Jitterbug Flip2 at $79.99 [21].

Hearing-aid compatibility. The M4/T4 rating, described as the highest available, was cited by multiple platforms as a meaningful advantage [23]. Independent testing reported no audio interference when used with hearing aids [24].

Month-to-month flexibility. Consumer Cellular's no-contract, month-to-month plans with a 30-day risk-free trial were consistently noted as buyer-friendly terms [25].

Simplified interface option. The phone offers a Simple mode showing only core functions like contacts, messages, and call history [24].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Emergency button capability was the most significant disagreement. Some platforms described an SOS/emergency button for quick access to emergency contacts [28], while others explicitly stated the first-generation IRIS Easy Flip lacks a dedicated physical SOS button with professional monitoring [30]. The google assessment clarified that the phone only supports ICE contact setup and speed dials, with 24/7 monitored emergency response available only through the separate IRIS Ally wearable device [32]. This conflict should be resolved by checking the specific unit before purchase.

Voice-to-text capability was disputed. Anthropic's assessment cited multiple independent reviews confirming the current IRIS Easy Flip does NOT have voice-to-text functionality, requiring manual T9 keypad entry [33]. However, openai's assessment mentioned "voice-texting capability" as a strength [31]. The anthropic assessment noted that 2023 marketing material mentioned voice-to-text, but 2025-2026 independent reviews confirm it is not available [33].

Battery life claims conflicted. Company claims of up to 48 hours talk/standby time conflict with independent testing confirming only 7 hours of actual talk time [36]. The 48-hour figure may refer to standby-only time.

Screen size varied by source. Sources varied between 2.8-inch and 3.2-inch internal screens, with Walmart and other retailers listing 3.2-inch while senior review sites cite 2.8-inch [38].

Network carrier was unclear. Most sources indicated AT&T network, but one source mentioned Verizon [39]. Consumer Cellular is an MVNO, and the primary confirmation is AT&T network, but independent verification of the current 2026 network partner is needed.

Product currency was uncertain. Consumer Cellular published information in May 2026 promoting the IRIS Easy Flip 2 at $99, suggesting the first-generation model may be discontinued or replaced [40]. Current availability and support status for the first-generation model are unclear.

Two platforms rated fit as uncertain. Both kimi and perplexity could not verify product specifications due to website retrieval failures and lack of independent reviews, rating the fit as "uncertain" rather than good or strong [41].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Interface simplicity. The phone offers a Simple interface intended to show only core functions such as contacts, messages, and call history [43]. However, independent testing found menu navigation non-intuitive, requiring users to click the large "OK" button to access menus [45]. The phone still includes Android-based features, browser access, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, hotspot, and other functions that may require additional setup [43].

Display readability. Dual 2.8-inch QVGA displays include an external screen for caller information and notifications without opening the phone [46]. Independent testers found almost all text in large font, suitable for older eyes [48]. Objective contrast and brightness measurements were not found [43].

Physical button size. The backlit keypad features large, well-separated, raised buttons that are easy to read and press [49]. Independent testing confirmed buttons are distinctly easy to identify and use, though the speaker button did not operate as expected during testing and the OK button was needed to activate speakerphone [43].

Speaker volume. The speakerphone reaches 111 dB, making conversations easier for those with hearing loss [51]. Independent hands-on testing found call audio clear with no interference with hearing aids [43]. Consistent maximum-volume measurements were not found [43].

Emergency access. The phone includes SOS/emergency contacts capability and a dedicated Favorites button for quick dialing [52]. However, the first-generation model lacks a dedicated physical SOS button with 24/7 professional monitoring, which is only available through the separate IRIS Ally wearable [54].

Text input. The phone uses traditional T9 predictive text requiring multiple key presses per letter [56]. Independent testing found composing "hello" requires 15 key presses, taking three times longer than voice-enabled competitors [57]. No voice-to-text capability is available [58].

Battery life. The 2000 mAh battery provides 7 hours of talk time and up to 14 days standby [59]. This is shorter than competing flip phones like the Jitterbug Flip2 and TCL FLIP Go [60].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Device cost. The IRIS Easy Flip costs $59 outright, based on an October 2025 independent review [61]. EasyPay financing is available at approximately $2.78/month with $0 down [63]. Current price and availability are unclear, and Consumer Cellular's May 2026 promotion lists the IRIS Easy Flip 2 at $99 full price or $3/month with $27 down [64].

Plan pricing. The Basic 1GB plan costs $20/month with AutoPay discount (base $25/month without AutoPay) and includes unlimited talk and text plus 1GB of high-speed data [63]. The Unlimited Data Plan for ages 50+ costs $35/month [66]. AARP members receive an additional 5% discount on monthly plans [63].

Additional fees. A $10 one-time network activation fee may apply per line, though online orders may currently receive free activation [67]. Additional charges include a $3.99 Monthly Operational Compliance Fee, $0.01 FCC Regulatory Fee, $1.80 Federal Universal Service Fund Fee, and state and local taxes [66]. Not enrolling in AutoPay or paperless billing may result in loss of discounts or an additional recurring charge [68].

Optional services. Phone protection plan starts at $2/month, and roadside assistance costs $4/month [63].

Contract terms. Service is month-to-month with no required minimum term [68]. Consumer Cellular advertises a risk-free cancellation period, generally 30 days with data use limited to 500MB [70]. The phone is locked to Consumer Cellular and requires a minimum 30-day service period before requesting an unlock [69].

Pricing confidence. Pricing confidence was rated "high" by anthropic and google, "moderate" by openai and deepseek, and "low" by kimi and perplexity. The $20/month plan price is supported by a current Consumer Cellular promotional page, but plan prices, AutoPay credits, taxes, and fees can change [65].

Best Suited For

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is best suited for:

  • Non-tech-savvy seniors wanting physical buttons and a traditional flip-phone design [71]
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking the lowest upfront device cost among flip phones at $59 [72]
  • Users with hearing aids, given the M4/T4 hearing-aid compatibility rating [73]
  • Seniors with dexterity concerns who benefit from large physical buttons and separated keypad layout [75]
  • Users who need unlimited calling and texting with little mobile-data usage [76]
  • Those seeking month-to-month flexibility with no long-term contract lock-in [77]
  • Users who benefit from an external notification display without opening the phone [78]
  • AARP members who can take advantage of a 5% monthly service discount and 30% off accessories [79]

Probably Not Best Suited For

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is probably not best suited for:

  • Seniors who send frequent or lengthy text messages, as T9 predictive text is slow and cumbersome without voice-to-text [80]
  • Users with arthritis or hand mobility issues who would benefit from voice-to-text, which is not available [82]
  • Those with cognitive decline, as menu navigation and the delete function lack intuitiveness per independent testing [83]
  • Users requiring a clearly documented one-press emergency or medical-alert button with 24/7 monitoring [84]
  • Heavy data users or those needing video calling capabilities [86]
  • Buyers requiring medical alert subscriptions, as the IRIS has SOS contacts only, no 24/7 monitoring service [84]
  • Users in rural areas with limited Consumer Cellular coverage, which uses the AT&T network [87]
  • Buyers seeking the newest available Consumer Cellular simplified flip phone, as the IRIS Easy Flip 2 is now promoted [88]
  • Users wanting a phone with no browser, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or Android-derived functions [85]

When Another Option May Be Better

Several platforms identified specific alternatives for particular needs:

  • For voice-to-text capability or hands-free texting: The Jitterbug Flip2 (includes voice assistant with Amazon Alexa, $79.99) or TCL FLIP Go (voice-to-text support, $96) are better options [89]
  • For medical alert monitoring: The Jitterbug Flip2 with Lively Health Services offers 24/7 urgent response and on-call nurses with select packages [91]
  • For 5G connectivity: The IRIS Easy Flip 2 (5G-enabled, 2026 model) or TCL FLIP Go (T-Mobile 5G network) are better options [92]
  • For longer battery life: The Jitterbug Flip2 or TCL FLIP Go offer longer talk time than 7 hours [94]
  • For staying on an existing carrier: The Nokia 2780 Flip allows use on Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile networks [91]
  • For verified hearing-aid compatibility and emergency button: The emporia Simplicity LTE offers M4/T4 rating, IP44 rating, patented emergency button, and charging cradle [95]
  • For programmable SOS with sequential calling: The Gigaset GL395 offers SOS emergency button with up to 5 sequential contacts [96]
  • For extremely tight budgets: Affinity Cellular offers plans starting at $12.99/month on Verizon, though with potential service/support limitations [97]

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Is the first-generation IRIS Easy Flip currently in stock, officially supported, and compatible with new Consumer Cellular activations? Current pages promote the IRIS Easy Flip 2 [98].

  2. Is the $59 device price still available, and is the phone locked to Consumer Cellular? The phone requires a minimum 30-day service period before requesting an unlock [99].

  3. Does the exact phone have a dedicated physical emergency button, or only emergency contacts/ICE shortcuts? Sources conflict on this point [100].

  4. Can the interface be locked into Simple mode so browser, app, Wi-Fi, and hotspot functions are hidden or disabled? [102]

  5. Does the speakerphone button work as labeled on the current software version? Independent testing found it did not operate as expected [102].

  6. Is the phone compatible with the buyer's specific hearing aid or cochlear-implant setup? M4/T4 rating is reported, but individual compatibility varies [103].

  7. What will the first bill total after taxes, regulatory fees, activation charges, device payment, and any AutoPay or paperless-billing conditions? [104]

  8. Does Consumer Cellular coverage work reliably at the buyer's home, frequently visited locations, and travel destinations? Coverage depends on AT&T network availability [106].

  9. What are the return conditions for the device, including data-use limits and any restocking, shipping, or device fees? [107]

  10. Are you purchasing the IRIS Easy Flip or the newer IRIS Easy Flip 2? Confirm which model is currently available and recommended [98].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is a good, but not unequivocally strong, fit for non-tech-savvy seniors who primarily need calling and texting. Five of seven platforms rated the fit as good or strong, with two rating it uncertain due to verification gaps. The phone's physical controls, simplified interface option, dual displays, M4/T4 hearing-aid compatibility, and low-cost talk-and-text plan are well aligned with the use case.

The main reasons to avoid an automatic strong rating are: uncertain current availability with possible replacement by the IRIS Easy Flip 2, the phone's residual Android-like complexity, the unclear emergency-button capability, the lack of voice-to-text for users with dexterity issues, the 7-hour talk-time battery requiring daily charging, and the speaker-control issue reported in independent testing.

For seniors who primarily call and send only brief texts, the $59 device cost and $20/month plans make it a strong budget option. For heavy texters or those with mobility constraints, the $20 premium for the Jitterbug Flip2 may deliver better long-term value despite higher upfront cost. Verify AT&T coverage and current model availability before purchasing.

For a broader comparison of simple cell phone options, see the Basic & Simplified Mobile Phones consensus index. You can also explore other options in the senior technology category directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity. Each platform independently evaluated the Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip against the category criteria for basic and simplified mobile phones for seniors. The research date for the authoritative run was 2026-08-11, though one platform (deepseek) reported an earlier research date of 2026-04-08.

Platform responses included fit ratings, use-case-specific findings, pricing and terms analysis, strengths and limitations, and questions to verify before buying. These responses were synthesized into this report, with factual claims cited to their original sources.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations should be noted:

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Deepseek reported a research date of 2026-04-08, while the authoritative run date is 2026-08-11. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

  • Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions. Kimi and perplexity reported website retrieval failures, resulting in "uncertain" fit ratings due to unverifiable specifications.

  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.

  • Conflicting product information was not resolved by guessing. Discrepancies in screen size (2.8-inch vs. 3.2-inch), battery life (7 hours vs. 48 hours), network carrier (AT&T vs. Verizon), and voice-to-text availability are described as conflicts for buyers to verify.

  • AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. This report describes what platforms reported; it does not constitute independent verification of product performance.

  • Objective measurements for screen contrast, maximum speaker loudness, battery endurance under typical use, and long-term reliability were not found in the supplied evidence.

  • The deterministic identity audit contains qualification notes. Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions, and identity was matched using exact-name fallback; the matching reported domain was retained for downstream research but remains unverified.

Explore more senior technology guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Consumer Cellular Official Website: https://consumercellular.com/
  • Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip Product Page: https://consumercellular.com/devices/flip-phones/iris-easy-flip
  • Unleash Simplicity and Connectivity with Consumer Cellular's IRIS Easy Flip - Our Blog: https://www.consumercellular.com/blog/consumer-cellulars-iris-easy-flip/
  • The Flip Phone You Love, Made Better: https://www.consumercellular.com/blog/iris-easy-flip-2/
  • Gigaset GL395 Mobile Phone for Seniors: https://www.gigaset.com/hq_en/gigaset-gl395/
  • What Is Product-Market Fit? Examples, Tips, and How to Measure: https://www.salesforce.com/blog/sales/product-market-fit/
  • Additional AI research evidence107 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    6. AI research evidence record google:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record google:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    14. AI research evidence record google:c4
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    16. AI research evidence record google:c2
    17. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    20. AI research evidence record google:c1
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    22. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    27. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record google:c4
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    32. AI research evidence record google:c5
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    41. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    42. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    44. AI research evidence record google:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    50. AI research evidence record google:c2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    53. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    54. AI research evidence record google:c4
    55. AI research evidence record google:c5
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    66. AI research evidence record google:c2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    74. AI research evidence record google:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    79. AI research evidence record google:c2
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    84. AI research evidence record google:c4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    91. AI research evidence record google:c4
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    93. AI research evidence record google:c2
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    101. AI research evidence record google:c4
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    105. AI research evidence record google:c2
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c8

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence107 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    6. AI research evidence record google:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record google:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    14. AI research evidence record google:c4
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    16. AI research evidence record google:c2
    17. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    20. AI research evidence record google:c1
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    22. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    27. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record google:c4
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    32. AI research evidence record google:c5
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    41. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    42. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    44. AI research evidence record google:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    50. AI research evidence record google:c2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    53. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    54. AI research evidence record google:c4
    55. AI research evidence record google:c5
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    66. AI research evidence record google:c2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    74. AI research evidence record google:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    79. AI research evidence record google:c2
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    84. AI research evidence record google:c4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    91. AI research evidence record google:c4
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    93. AI research evidence record google:c2
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    101. AI research evidence record google:c4
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    105. AI research evidence record google:c2
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c8

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 11, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
29
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#2

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

14 independent · 14 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

26 direct · 2 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 ee5d29dce4b86d2248b044792a80fca74c67c00980f56f754f260f6ac58447fc