AI Consensus Fit Review

Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip for Simplified Smartphone Access - AI Consensus Fit Review

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is a weak-to-mixed fit for Simplified Smartphone Access as defined in this study.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip for Simplified Smartphone Access hero image
senior-technologyPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is a weak-to-mixed fit for Simplified Smartphone Access as defined in this study. Two of seven AI platforms named it during the ranking stage, giving it an average listed rank of 4.0 and a best rank of 3. The strongest reason to consider it is its combination of a very simple physical design, M4/T4 hearing-aid compatibility, and a low $59 device price paired with Consumer Cellular plans starting at $20/month. The main limitation is decisive: the phone lacks an app store, mainstream video-calling apps, a voice assistant, and voice-to-text, which are core requirements for the target buyer who wants app access, video calls, maps, photos, and family messaging. Independent hands-on testing found text composition took three times longer than voice-enabled competitors, and keypad-based web browsing was nearly unusable.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 (anthropic, grok)
Share of included platform responses28.6% (2 of 7)
Average listed rank4.0
Best listed rank3 (grok)
Final rank5
Relevant product/model/planIRIS Easy Flip ($59) with Consumer Cellular plan starting at $20/month
Overall use-case fitWeak to mixed (2 weak, 1 mixed, 1 good, 1 strong, 2 uncertain)
Research date2026-08-13

Why Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip Qualified for This Study

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip entered this study because two of the seven participating AI platforms (anthropic and grok) named it during the ranking stage for Best Smartphones for Seniors. Anthropic ranked it 5th and grok ranked it 3rd, producing an average rank of 4.0. The other five platforms did not name it during ranking discovery, which is why the platform mention share is 28.6%. The entity was then evaluated by all seven platforms for fit against the specific use case of Simplified Smartphone Access, defined as serving older adults who want app access, video calls, maps, photos, and family messaging without overwhelming menus or confusing setup.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Simplified Smartphone Access

The relevant configuration is the Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip flip phone priced at $59, paired with a Consumer Cellular monthly plan starting at $20/month for unlimited talk and text with 1GB of high-speed data [1]. The phone is a basic flip phone, not a conventional smartphone. It runs a heavily restricted version of Android without access to mainstream app stores like Google Play [5]. Independent hands-on testing describes it as a low-complexity device with a physical keypad, dual 2.8-inch displays, and a simplified interface [1].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement: The IRIS Easy Flip is not a conventional smartphone and cannot run standard apps. Six of seven platforms that provided substantive fit assessments (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, google, and kimi) either confirmed or did not dispute that the device lacks an app store and cannot install mainstream applications like WhatsApp, Messenger, Zoom, or Google Maps [8]. Independent testing reports no app store and no ability to download additional apps [8].

Strong agreement: The phone has a genuinely simplified interface. Multiple platforms described the large backlit keypad, tactile buttons, and minimal menu navigation as strengths for users overwhelmed by smartphone complexity [8]. The dual 2.8-inch screens allow users to see incoming calls and notifications without opening the phone [19].

Strong agreement: Hearing-aid compatibility is a documented strength. Consumer Cellular lists the IRIS Easy Flip as M4/T4 under the 2011 ANSI hearing-aid-compatibility standard, the highest available rating [21]. Independent testing reported zero interference with Bluetooth-compatible modern hearing aids [23].

Strong agreement: The device price and entry-level plan are affordable. The $59 device price and $20/month entry plan were cited consistently across platforms [8]. Consumer Cellular advertises no-contract monthly plans [28].

Majority agreement: Battery life is strong for a basic phone. Independent testing reported approximately seven hours of talk time and up to 13-14 days of standby from a 2000 mAh battery [8]. One platform noted the newer IRIS Easy Flip 2 has a 3000 mAh battery with 15 hours of talk time, but the original model is the focus here [31].

Majority agreement: No voice assistant or voice-to-text. Independent hands-on testing specifically reports the IRIS Easy Flip lacks voice commands and voice-to-text [8]. This makes text composition significantly slower than voice-enabled competitors [33].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Fit rating disagreement. The seven platforms split into four categories: grok rated the fit "strong," anthropic rated it "good," deepseek rated it "mixed," openai and google rated it "weak," and kimi and perplexity rated it "uncertain." This is a genuine disagreement, not a consensus. The platforms that rated it more favorably emphasized the simplified interface, hearing-aid compatibility, and low cost; the platforms that rated it poorly emphasized the absence of app access, video calling, and voice features.

Emergency features conflict. Anthropic cited a dedicated emergency button with SOS functionality and the ability to dial 911 without a SIM card [35]. Openai and google found no dedicated safety features for this model [37]. Grok also reported no dedicated emergency or safety features [40]. This is a direct factual conflict that buyers should verify before purchase.

Battery life variance. Most sources cite 7 hours talk time and 13-14 days standby [37]. One platform noted the newer IRIS Easy Flip 2 model has a 3000 mAh battery and 15 hours talk time [42]. The original model's figures are consistent across independent reviews.

Product identity uncertainty. Kimi reported that no search results confirmed an "IRIS Easy Flip" product at $59, and that Consumer Cellular's current senior-focused line is the SpeakEasy brand [43]. Perplexity similarly could not verify the product's features or pricing from the official domain [45]. This does not mean the product does not exist—Consumer Cellular's own pages reference the IRIS Easy Flip [46]—but it does mean some platforms could not independently verify the product identity.

Plan pricing variance. Most sources cite $20/month as the entry plan [49]. Anthropic noted some sources indicate $25/month, possibly reflecting autopay discounts or regional variations. Deepseek described the $20 plan as talk/text with data add-ons costing extra [48].

Satisfaction guarantee period conflict. Consumer Cellular's own pages show inconsistent periods, including 30 days and 45 days in different locations [47]. The 45-day figure appears on the IRIS Easy Flip product page with data limited to 500MB during the trial [47].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Simplified interface: Advantage. The flip-phone design with physical keypad, large backlit buttons, and minimal menu navigation is consistently described as easy to learn for basic calling and texting [52].

Display size and readability: Mixed. The dual 2.8-inch screens provide large, easy-to-read text [59]. However, the small screen limits photo viewing and map readability [56]. The phone lacks adjustable font scaling and advanced accessibility customization [61].

Voice assistant support: Limitation. No voice commands, voice-to-text, Google Assistant, or Alexa integration [52]. This is a significant limitation for users with arthritis or dexterity limitations.

Hearing-aid compatibility: Advantage. M4/T4 rating under the 2011 ANSI standard, the highest available [63]. Bluetooth-compatible for modern hearing aids with zero reported interference in testing [65].

Emergency features: Conflicting. Anthropic reports a dedicated emergency button and 911 dialing without a SIM [66]. Openai, google, and grok report no dedicated safety features [52]. This conflict must be resolved with the seller.

Battery life: Advantage. 2000 mAh battery, approximately 7 hours talk time, 13-14 days standby [52].

App access: Major limitation. No app store, no ability to download apps [52]. This is the single most important limitation for this use case.

Video calls: Major limitation. No native video calling capability, no support for FaceTime, WhatsApp video, Zoom, or Skype [73]. No front-facing camera for video calls [56].

Maps and internet: Unclear-to-limited. The phone reportedly supports internet browsing and GPS-related functions [74], but independent testing found keypad-based web browsing nearly unusable [72]. No verified evidence of full Google Maps-style navigation [52].

Family messaging: Limitation. Supports standard SMS with T9 predictive text requiring multiple keypresses per letter [76]. No support for WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, or group chat platforms [77]. Text composition took three times longer than voice-enabled competitors [78].

Photo capability: Neutral. Single 5MP rear camera with selfie mode using the external display [79]. Up to 128GB storage expansion with microSD card [80]. Photo quality is grainy and basic [58].

Carrier plan cost: Advantage. Plans start at $20/month for unlimited talk and text with 1GB data [81]. No long-term contracts [84]. AARP members receive 5% additional discount [85].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

The recommended configuration is reported as a $59 phone paired with Consumer Cellular service starting at $20/month [86]. Pricing confidence is moderate to high across platforms, with the following known costs:

Cost itemAmountSource
IRIS Easy Flip device$59 (one-time)[86], [87], [88]
Entry plan$20/month (unlimited talk/text, 1GB data)[89], [90], [88]
Activation fee$10 per line (waived for online orders as of 2026)
AARP member discount5% additional off monthly service[91]
Senior 50+ unlimited plan$35/month (unlimited talk, text, data)
IRIS Easy Flip 2 (newer model)$99.99 or $2.78/month EasyPay[92]
Optional device protectionFrom $2.00/month
Optional roadside assistance$4.00/month

Contract terms. Consumer Cellular advertises no-contract monthly plans [93]. Plans can be changed or canceled anytime without penalty [94]. The phone is locked to Consumer Cellular and cannot be used with other carriers.

Satisfaction guarantee. Consumer Cellular advertises a satisfaction guarantee, but public pages show inconsistent periods: 30 days in some locations and 45 days in others [95]. The 45-day figure appears on the IRIS Easy Flip product page with data limited to 500MB during the trial [95].

Additional fees. Taxes, regulatory charges, and government fees are not included in advertised prices. Possible shipping charges apply. International roaming costs extra.

Pricing conflict to verify. The supplied $59 device price is supported by independent reviews, but Consumer Cellular search results also show a later promotional reference to $28. The newer IRIS Easy Flip 2 is priced at $99.99 [92]. Current checkout pricing should be verified.

Best Suited For

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is best suited for older adults who:

  • Primarily need simple calling and texting with a physical keypad
  • Prioritize low device cost and predictable monthly expenses
  • Use hearing aids and need M4/T4 compatibility [96]
  • Want long standby battery life without frequent charging [98]
  • Are first-time phone users transitioning from landlines
  • Want to minimize screen time and avoid internet distractions
  • Need basic photo storage for family memories via microSD expansion [100]

Probably Not Best Suited For

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is probably not best suited for older adults who:

  • Need FaceTime, WhatsApp, Zoom, Messenger, or other downloadable apps
  • Want easy app-based video calls with family
  • Need voice-to-text or a voice assistant due to arthritis or dexterity limitations
  • Frequently send long text messages or engage in extended family group chats
  • Require turn-by-turn GPS navigation
  • Want to easily view and share photos on a larger touchscreen display
  • Need a dedicated 24/7 emergency response or medical alert service

When Another Option May Be Better

Choose an entry-level Android smartphone or iPhone when app access, video calls, Google Maps, photo sharing, and family-messaging apps are core requirements. A smartphone with a simplified mode—such as Apple's AssistiveTouch or Samsung's Easy Mode—can provide both accessibility and modern apps.

Choose a senior-oriented smartphone with an explicit simplified launcher and voice assistant when the buyer needs both accessibility and modern apps. The Jitterbug Smart4 from Lively is cited as a better option for app access and video calls.

Choose a phone with a dedicated emergency button or medical-alert service when emergency response is a primary requirement. The Jitterbug Flip2 with Lively monitoring service offers 24/7 emergency response.

Choose RealSAM Pocket for full voice operation without touchscreen learning. Choose RAZ Memory Cell Phone for severe cognitive decline with remote caregiver management. Choose SmartVision 3 for physical buttons with blindness or low vision, if T-Mobile coverage is adequate.

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Is the IRIS Easy Flip currently available for purchase new from Consumer Cellular, or has it been discontinued in favor of the IRIS Easy Flip 2? One source indicates Consumer Cellular may no longer actively sell the original model.

  2. Can the exact current model install or run any required apps, including WhatsApp, Messenger, Zoom, or Google Maps? Independent testing says no, but verify with the seller.

  3. Can it make video calls, and if so, through which built-in service? No native video calling is documented [101].

  4. Does it support voice dialing, voice search, voice-to-text, or any voice assistant? Independent testing says no [102].

  5. What are the exact inner and outer display sizes, text-size options, and font-scaling controls? Dual 2.8-inch screens are documented, but font scaling is not adjustable [104].

  6. Does the buyer's specific hearing aid work reliably with the phone's M4/T4 rating? The rating is favorable, but individual performance varies [106].

  7. Is there any programmable emergency shortcut, and does it contact a person, 911, or only a saved contact? Sources conflict on whether a dedicated emergency button exists [107].

  8. What is the current device price, shipping charge, tax, and any installment option? The $59 price may be promotional; the IRIS Easy Flip 2 is $99.99 [108].

  9. What is the final monthly bill after or without AutoPay and e-billing discounts, including taxes and fees? The $20 plan may include an AutoPay credit.

  10. Which satisfaction-guarantee period applies to this purchase—30 days or 45 days—and what return conditions apply? Consumer Cellular pages show both [109].

  11. Is the phone locked to Consumer Cellular, and can it be used with the buyer's current number and coverage area? The phone is locked to Consumer Cellular.

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip is a weak-to-mixed fit for Simplified Smartphone Access. The AI platforms that rated it favorably (grok: strong, anthropic: good) emphasized its genuinely simple interface, M4/T4 hearing-aid compatibility, low $59 device price, $20/month entry plan, and long battery life. The platforms that rated it poorly (openai: weak, google: weak) and the one that rated it mixed (deepseek) emphasized the same core limitation: this is a basic flip phone, not a smartphone. It cannot install apps, cannot make video calls, has no voice assistant or voice-to-text, and its keypad-based web browsing is nearly unusable.

For the specific target buyer—an older adult who wants app access, video calls, maps, photos, and family messaging—the IRIS Easy Flip fails on the most important requirements. It is a strong choice for a different buyer: someone who primarily wants simple calling, occasional texting, hearing-aid compatibility, and a low monthly bill. If the buyer's needs are limited to basic communication, this phone is an excellent value. If the buyer needs modern family connectivity, a simplified smartphone is the better path.

For the full comparison of options, see the Simplified Smartphone Access consensus index. For related senior-focused technology options, browse the senior technology category directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced on 2026-08-13 by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, and google. Each platform evaluated the Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip against the same use-case criteria: simplified interface, display size, font scaling, voice assistant support, hearing-aid compatibility, emergency features, battery life, and carrier plan cost. The platforms drew on 27 deduplicated sources, including independent reviews from The Senior List, SeniorLiving.org, SeniorSite, and YouTube, plus company-owned pages from Consumer Cellular. Platform-reported research dates vary: deepseek reported 2026-04-11, while all other platforms reported 2026-08-13. The authoritative run date for this study is 2026-08-13.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform mention count reflects ranking-stage discovery only. Two of seven platforms named the IRIS Easy Flip during ranking; all seven evaluated fit afterward. The platform share of 28.6% reflects ranking-stage mentions, not evaluation coverage.
  • Product identity was not uniformly verified. Kimi and perplexity could not confirm the IRIS Easy Flip's existence or features from available search results. Consumer Cellular's own pages reference the product, but some platforms could not independently verify it.
  • Pricing conflicts remain unresolved. The $59 device price is supported by independent reviews, but a promotional $28 reference and the $99.99 IRIS Easy Flip 2 price create ambiguity. Current checkout pricing should be verified.
  • Emergency feature claims conflict. Anthropic reports a dedicated emergency button; openai, google, and grok report none. This conflict could not be resolved from the supplied sources.
  • Satisfaction guarantee periods are inconsistent. Consumer Cellular pages show both 30-day and 45-day periods.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. These findings reflect what the platforms reported from their sources, not independent verification by this review.
  • No personal testing was conducted. All device performance claims come from the cited independent reviews and company sources.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Consumer Cellular official website (checked; no verifiable product evidence supplied in results: https://consumercellular.com/
  • Friendly voice-operated smartphone - RealSAM USA: https://realsam.us/
  • Freedom Calls | Consumer Cellular: https://www.consumercellular.com/freedom-calls
  • Consumer Cellular IRIS Ally User Guide & Manual: https://www.consumercellular.com/help/videos-and-manuals/iris-ally
  • Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip User Guide & Manual: https://www.consumercellular.com/help/videos-and-manuals/iris-easy-flip
  • Consumer Cellular IRIS Easy Flip 2: Price, Overview, & Features: https://www.consumercellular.com/shopping/details/iris_easy_flip_2/details
  • Memory Cell Phone for Seniors with Memory Loss (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile network compatible) | Shop | RAZ Mobility: https://www.razmobility.com/product/raz-memory-cell-phone-verizon/
  • Easy Smartphone for Seniors | SpeakEasy: https://www.speakeasymobile.com/smartphone
  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    5. AI research evidence record google:c1
    6. AI research evidence record google:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:c1
    14. AI research evidence record google:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    18. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    27. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    31. AI research evidence record google:c3
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    39. AI research evidence record google:c2
    40. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    42. AI research evidence record google:c3
    43. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    44. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    48. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    51. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    56. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    57. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    58. AI research evidence record google:c1
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    69. AI research evidence record google:c2
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    83. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    88. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    92. AI research evidence record google:c3
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    94. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    108. AI research evidence record google:c3
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25

Independent Sources

  • Consumer Cellular Launches SpeakEasy Mobile for Seniors: https://clark.com/cell-phones/consumer-cellular-launches-speakeasy/
  • IRIS Flip Phone Review: Features and Pricing | SeniorSite: https://seniorsite.org/resource/iris-flip-phone-review-hidden-features-and-pricing
  • Consumer Cellular Iris Flip Phone Manual & Texting Guide | JustAnswer: https://www.justanswer.com/email/o8e73-website-actually-shows-text-a.html
  • Best Cell Phones for Seniors in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/cell-phone/best/
  • Best Flip Phones for Seniors in 2026: https://www.theseniorlist.com/cell-phones/best/flip/
  • The 6 Best Cell Phone Plans for Seniors (2026), Tested by: https://www.theseniorlist.com/cell-phones/best/plans/
  • Iris Easy Flip Review, a Hands-On Test: https://www.theseniorlist.com/cell-phones/iris-easy-flip/
  • Consumer Cellular Iris Easy Flip Review: https://www.theseniorlist.com/cell-phones/iris-flip/
  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    5. AI research evidence record google:c1
    6. AI research evidence record google:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:c1
    14. AI research evidence record google:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    18. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    27. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    31. AI research evidence record google:c3
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    39. AI research evidence record google:c2
    40. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    42. AI research evidence record google:c3
    43. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    44. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    48. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    51. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    56. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    57. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    58. AI research evidence record google:c1
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    69. AI research evidence record google:c2
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    83. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    88. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    92. AI research evidence record google:c3
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    94. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    108. AI research evidence record google:c3
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 13, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
27
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#5

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

15 independent · 12 company-owned

Evidence support

22 direct · 4 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 2feb7bbb1079204d8930afa01dac99c0be70e0f4230e068a303aae17055f1639