AI Consensus Fit Review

TubToday 36x55 WD for Bariatric and Extra-Wide Bathing - AI Consensus Fit Review

The TubToday 36x55 WD is a good but not fully verified fit for bariatric and extra-wide bathing.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
TubToday 36x55 WD for Bariatric and Extra-Wide Bathing hero image
walk-in-tubsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

The TubToday 36x55 WD is a good but not fully verified fit for bariatric and extra-wide bathing. Two of seven AI platforms named it during the ranking stage (kimi and openai), with an average listed rank of 5.0 and a best rank of 3. The strongest reason to consider it is the combination of a 36-inch-wide footprint, a 29-inch (possibly 31-inch) seat, wheelchair-transfer L-shaped outward-swing door, and dual 2-inch gravity drains. The main limitation is the absence of a published maximum weight capacity, clear door-opening width, reinforced-frame load rating, floor-traction specification, and water capacity—all critical for bariatric buyers. Purchase should be conditional on receiving written specifications and a complete installed quote.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 (kimi, openai)
Share of included platform responses2 of 7 (28.6%)
Average listed rank5.0
Best listed rank3 (openai)
Relevant product/model/planTubToday 36x55 WD wheelchair-accessible, outward-swing-door walk-in tub with dual drain
Overall use-case fitGood (2 platforms), Strong (3 platforms), Uncertain (2 platforms)
Research date2026-08-13

Why TubToday 36x55 WD Qualified for This Study

The TubToday 36x55 WD qualified because it was named by two platforms during the ranking stage for best bariatric walk-in tubs. OpenAI ranked it 3rd; Kimi ranked it 7th. The model was evaluated against category criteria including maximum weight capacity, seat width, door width, reinforced frame, floor traction, grab bar placement, water capacity, installation footprint, and warranty coverage.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Bariatric & Extra-Wide Bathing

The relevant product is the TubToday 36x55 WD, a wheelchair-accessible, L-shaped outward-swing-door acrylic walk-in tub. Company materials describe it as a bariatric tub for large body types requiring maximum interior space [1]. The model includes:

  • Dimensions: Approximately 35.75 inches wide by 55 inches long by 40 inches high, with an extension option for a 60-inch alcove [1]
  • Seat width: 29 inches per most sources [1]; one source lists 31 inches [4]
  • Door: 36-inch L-shaped outward-swing aluminum door with two-latch system [5]
  • Drains: Dual 2-inch gravity drains with four 2-inch outlets [7]
  • Frame: Stainless steel frame reinforced with fiberglass mesh and gelcoat layers [9]
  • Included: Two stainless-steel chrome grab bars [1]
  • Optional: Heated seat and backrest ($889), wall-mounted grab bar ($135), shower slide bar ($349), quad-fold shower doors ($650), rain shower package ($725), independent foot massage ($1,880), aromatherapy ($265) [1]

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement existed on the seat width and interior space advantage. Five platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, google) identified the wide seat as a meaningful advantage for extra-wide bathing. The 29-inch seat exceeds the 24-inch seat on the smaller TubToday 32x52 WD model [10]. Anthropic described it as the widest configuration TubToday offers for single-seat models [11].

Strong agreement existed on the wheelchair-transfer door design. Six platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, google, perplexity) noted the L-shaped outward-swing door as an advantage for wheelchair transfers and assisted entry. The outward swing reduces transfer obstruction compared to inward-swing designs [12].

Strong agreement existed on dual drain technology. Five platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, google) cited the dual 2-inch gravity drains as an advantage. Company materials state typical drainage time of 80–120 seconds, depending on water volume and household drain conditions [14].

Strong agreement existed on the missing weight capacity. All seven platforms noted that no maximum user weight capacity is published for this model. The product is marketed as bariatric and "recommended for large body types," but no quantified load rating exists [12].

Majority agreement existed on the reinforced frame. Four platforms (anthropic, deepseek, grok, google) cited the stainless steel frame with fiberglass mesh and gelcoat layers. However, no platform found independent load-testing documentation [21].

Majority agreement existed on the limited lifetime warranty. Four platforms (openai, anthropic, grok, google) described the warranty as limited lifetime for the original purchaser at the original installation address, with labor and installation excluded [23].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Seat width discrepancy: 29 vs. 31 inches. Most sources list a 29-inch seat [25]. Anthropic's review of tubtoday.com lists a 31-inch seat [28]. OpenAI flagged this as a factual conflict, noting a separate older TransferXXXL page refers to an ultra-wide 31-inch seat [25]. Buyers should confirm the correct measurement in the signed specification.

Weight capacity claims conflict. DeepSeek reported that TubToday's website advertises a 400 lb weight capacity for select models, but this is not consistent across models and not stated for the 36x55 WD specifically [29]. Google noted that similar Ella's Bubbles bariatric models support up to 800 lbs, but this is not a TubToday specification [30]. No platform found a published capacity for this model.

Water capacity conflict. Google cited a technical sheet listing 90 gallons total with 55–75 gallons occupied capacity, while noting some review directories reference a 132-gallon total capacity [30]. Other platforms found no water capacity published at all [25].

Fit ratings split. Three platforms rated the fit "strong" (deepseek, grok, google), two rated it "good" (openai, anthropic), and two rated it "uncertain" (kimi, perplexity). The uncertain ratings stem from insufficient publicly verifiable specifications.

Product line positioning conflict. Kimi noted that TubToday markets the 36x72 OS as "our largest oversized walk-in bathtub," suggesting the 36x55 WD may not be the brand's premier bariatric option [34]. Other platforms did not make this comparison.

Pricing transparency conflict. OpenAI and Google reported a published price range of $6,476–$12,188 [25]. DeepSeek and Kimi reported that pricing requires direct quote and is not publicly listed [29]. This may reflect different pages or updated listings.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Maximum Weight Capacity

Assessment: Unclear. No maximum user or occupant weight capacity is stated on the reviewed product pages. The company describes the model as bariatric, but that description is not a quantified load rating [36]. DeepSeek reported a 400 lb claim for select TubToday models, but not specifically for the 36x55 WD [38].

Seat Width

Assessment: Advantage. The 29-inch seat (per most sources) is a meaningful advantage for extra-wide bathing and exceeds the 24-inch seat on the smaller 32x52 WD model [36]. Anthropic lists 31 inches [44]. This exceeds standard tubs at 22–24 inches [44].

Door Width and Transfer Space

Assessment: Advantage, with verification needed. The model uses a 36-inch L-shaped outward-swing aluminum door designed for wheelchair transfers [44]. The outward swing can improve entry and exit space, but the page warns that bathroom obstructions may prevent the door from opening [36]. The stated 36-inch dimension refers to the tub width and door description, not necessarily the clear opening [36].

Reinforced Frame

Assessment: Unclear. The tub features a stainless steel frame reinforced with multiple fiberglass mesh and gelcoat layers under the acrylic shell [46]. The product page identifies a light aluminum door frame but does not publish a reinforced-tub-frame specification, structural rating, or bariatric load certification [36]. This is a company claim not independently verified for load testing [46].

Floor Traction

Assessment: Unclear. No specific anti-slip flooring material, coefficient-of-friction rating, or floor-traction certification was identified in the reviewed product information [36]. Anthropic noted a textured floor and low step-in threshold are included for safety, but no grip coefficient is specified [44].

Grab Bar Placement

Assessment: Neutral to Advantage. Two stainless-steel chrome-finish grab bars are listed as included; an additional wall-mounted grab bar is optional for $135 [36]. Exact placement, load rating, and whether the included bars are structurally reinforced for bariatric transfers are not stated [36]. Anthropic noted grab bars are optional add-ons, not standard [44].

Water Capacity

Assessment: Unclear. The reviewed product page does not state water capacity or fill volume [36]. Google cited a technical sheet listing 90 gallons total with 55–75 gallons occupied capacity, but this appears to reference a comparable Ella's Bubbles model [48]. Some users reported needing to upgrade their water heater to support the large water capacity [49].

Installation Footprint

Assessment: Neutral. Listed dimensions are approximately 35.75 inches wide by 55 inches long by 40 inches high, with an extension option for a 60-inch alcove [36]. The outward door requires unobstructed swing clearance [36]. The model includes reversible end panels for left/right installation and an extension panel kit for alcove installation [44]. Diagonal corner-to-corner measurement is not provided for this model [37].

Warranty Coverage

Assessment: Neutral to Limitation. The published warranty describes a limited lifetime warranty for the original purchaser at the original installation address, covering the shell, frame, door, seal, finish, and listed components under stated conditions [50]. Installation, plumbing/electrical connections, relocation, modifications, incidental damage, and some faucet or thermostatic-control issues are excluded or separately limited [50]. The faucet is covered for 1 year only [51]. The warranty is non-transferable [37]. Labor and shipping costs are not included [52].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Product price range: $6,476.00–$12,188.00, depending on jetting and configuration selections [53]. The displayed range does not establish whether installation, freight, permits, demolition, plumbing, electrical work, or taxes are included [53].

Known optional costs:

  • Wall-mounted grab bar: $135.00 [53]
  • Quad-fold shower doors: $650.00 [53]
  • Rain shower package: $725.00 [53]
  • Wall-mount shower slide bar: $349.00 [53]
  • Heated seat and back rest: $889.00 [53]
  • Independent foot massage: $1,880.00 [53]
  • Aromatherapy: $265.00 [53]
  • Faucet replacement: $500.00 [56]

Additional fees: Shipping, installation, plumbing, electrical work, permits, site preparation, demolition, and taxes are not itemized on the reviewed product page and should be confirmed [53]. DeepSeek estimated installation costs typically $1,000–$3,000 depending on location, but this is platform-reported, not company-verified [57].

Return and cancellation terms: Returns, exchanges, or order modifications are allowed within 90 days only if the product is returned in its original undamaged container [58]. Returns may incur a 20% restocking fee plus shipping costs and expenses [58]. No refunds are stated after 90 days [58]. The buyer is responsible for inspecting the unit on delivery and filing shipping-damage claims with the carrier before departure [58]. The published terms state binding arbitration in Kane County, Illinois if mediation fails [58].

Pricing confidence: Moderate to low. OpenAI and Google reported moderate-to-high confidence in the $6,476–$12,188 range [53]. DeepSeek and Kimi reported low confidence, stating pricing requires direct quote [57]. Perplexity found pricing unclear [60].

Best Suited For

The TubToday 36x55 WD is best suited for:

  • Heavier users who need substantially more interior width than standard walk-in tubs [61]
  • Wheelchair users or caregivers needing side-transfer access [61]
  • Bathrooms that can accommodate an approximately 36-inch-wide, 55-inch-long tub and outward door clearance [61]
  • Buyers who value dual gravity drains and optional heated seating [61]
  • Users prioritizing maximum seat width (29–31 inches) [62]
  • Buyers seeking optional therapeutic jetting systems [67]

Probably Not Best Suited For

The TubToday 36x55 WD is probably not best suited for:

  • Buyers requiring a published, independently verified maximum weight capacity [68]
  • Bathrooms where an outward-swing door cannot open fully [68]
  • Buyers seeking a turnkey installed price with clearly itemized installation costs [68]
  • Users who need specifically documented non-slip flooring or customized grab-bar placement [68]
  • Very compact bathroom spaces (36-inch width and 55-inch length required) [75]
  • Homes with standard 40-gallon water heaters that cannot support high-capacity tubs [76]
  • Budget-conscious buyers (pricing starts at $6,476 base) [77]

When Another Option May Be Better

Several platforms identified alternatives with more transparent specifications:

  • When documented weight capacity is mandatory: American Tubs D3355KS specifies a 400 lb capacity [78]. This is a company-published specification, not independently verified.
  • When verified 29-inch seat width is required: Ella's Bubbles TransferXXL/XXXL and Freedom XXXL specify 29-inch seats with 36x55 dimensions [79]. WalkIn Tubs of America TransferXXXL also lists a 29-inch seat [81].
  • When a 30-inch seat is needed: Safety Bath Grandeur offers a 30-inch seat with a 32-inch door at $8,314 [82].
  • When the largest TubToday model is preferred: TubToday 36x72 OS is marketed as the company's largest oversized walk-in bathtub [83].
  • When budget is a primary concern: Freedom XXXL lists at $5,733–$7,766 [80], below the TubToday 36x55 WD base price.
  • When a smaller footprint is needed: Consider TubToday 32x52 WD or 30x52 WD models [84].
  • When independently verified safety specifications are required without direct sales contact: Competitors with published specifications may be preferable [78].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Before purchasing the TubToday 36x55 WD, buyers should verify:

  1. What is the manufacturer's maximum tested occupant weight and total load rating, including water and caregiver-assisted transfer loads? [86]
  2. What is the exact clear door-opening width and the required unobstructed outward swing radius? [86]
  3. Is the frame or substructure specifically reinforced for bariatric use, and is there documentation of structural testing? [86]
  4. What is the flooring material and slip-resistance rating when wet and when soapy? [86]
  5. Where exactly are the included grab bars mounted, what are their load ratings, and can placement be customized? [86]
  6. What is the filled water capacity and estimated hot-water requirement for this model? [86]
  7. What drain time should be expected with the buyer's existing drain size, slope, venting, and configuration? [86]
  8. Does the quoted price include freight, installation, permits, demolition, plumbing, electrical work, taxes, and disposal? [86]
  9. Who performs installation and warranty service, and what travel, labor, or diagnostic charges may apply? [86]
  10. Which parts are covered for the full warranty term, and what registration, maintenance, relocation, and transfer restrictions apply? [91]
  11. Can the buyer or intended user perform an in-person transfer trial before purchase? [86]
  12. What happens if the tub arrives damaged, cannot fit through the home, or fails the pre-installation water test? [92]
  13. What does "WD" stand for, and how does this model differ from the 36x72 OS? [93]
  14. Are there independent safety certifications (UL, CSA, IAPMO)? [94]
  15. What is the lead time for order, manufacturing, and delivery? [87]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The TubToday 36x55 WD is a good, but not fully verified, fit for bariatric and extra-wide bathing. The AI consensus is split: three platforms rated it "strong" (deepseek, grok, google), two rated it "good" (openai, anthropic), and two rated it "uncertain" (kimi, perplexity).

The strongest attributes are the 36-inch-wide format, 29-inch (possibly 31-inch) seat, wheelchair-transfer design, outward-swing door, dual 2-inch drains, and optional heated seating. The missing weight-capacity, traction, reinforced-frame, clear-door-width, water-capacity, and installation-cost data prevent a strong rating.

Purchase should be conditional on receiving written specifications and a complete installed quote. The absence of a published maximum weight capacity is the single most important gap for bariatric buyers. Company-owned sources materially outnumber independent sources in this review; no independent load testing, slip-resistance certification, or third-party verification was identified.

For the broader context of bariatric walk-in tub options, see the Bariatric & Extra-Wide Bathing consensus index. You can also browse other walk in tubs options in the category directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, and Google. Each platform evaluated the TubToday 36x55 WD against category criteria for bariatric and extra-wide bathing, including maximum weight capacity, seat width, door width, reinforced frame, floor traction, grab bar placement, water capacity, installation footprint, and warranty coverage.

The authoritative research date is 2026-08-13. Platform-reported research dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. DeepSeek's response was dated 2026-04-12, which differs from the authoritative run date; this is disclosed as a methodology limitation.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform mentions count: Only 2 of 7 platforms (kimi, openai) named the TubToday 36x55 WD during the ranking stage. The other 5 platforms evaluated fit but did not rank the entity.
  • Company-owned evidence dominance: Of 20 deduplicated sources, 19 are company-owned and only 1 is independent (assistedliving.org). Company claims should not be treated as independently verified.
  • No independent testing identified: No independent load testing, slip-resistance certification, or third-party verification of bariatric claims was found.
  • Seat width conflict unresolved: The 29-inch vs. 31-inch seat width discrepancy across sources could not be resolved from available evidence.
  • Weight capacity absent: No platform found a published maximum weight capacity for this specific model.
  • URLs not independently validated: The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Platform-reported dates differ: DeepSeek's research date (2026-04-12) differs from the authoritative run date (2026-08-13).
  • No personal testing: This review does not include personal testing, customer experience verification, or independent performance measurement.

Explore more walk in tubs guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • TransferXXL Wheelchair Accessible Bariatric Walk-In Tub 36x55: https://ellasbubbles.com/walk-in-tubs/wheelchair-transfer-door/transferxxl/
  • The Grandeur Walk-In Tub | Safety & Comfort: https://safetybathtubs.com/shop/walk-in-bathtubs/grandeur/
  • TransferXXXL - WalkIn Tubs of America: https://walkintubsofamerica.com/product/transferxxxl/
  • Walk-In Tubs from TubToday: https://walkintubusa.com/
  • Affordable walk-in tubs for small bathrooms - TubToday: https://walkintubusa.com/affordable-walk-in-tubs-for-small-bathrooms/
  • Acrylic Walk In Bath Warranty Information: https://walkintubusa.com/pdf/products/TubToday_warranty.pdf
  • TubToday 36x72 OS - Walk In Tub USA: https://walkintubusa.com/product/36x72-os/
  • TubToday 36x55 WD - Walk In Tub USA: https://walkintubusa.com/product/transferxxxl/
  • TubToday 32x52 WD - Walk In Tub USA: https://walkintubusa.com/product/tubtoday-32x52-wd/
  • Testing; Returns; Claims; Terms and Conditions: https://walkintubusa.com/return-policy-claims/
  • Walk in Bathtubs for Walk-in Bathtubs - Walk In Tub USA: https://walkintubusa.com/walk-in-bathtub/
  • Freedom XXXL Walk in Bathtub, 36" x 55" Transfer Tub with Hydro Jets: https://www.freedomshowers.com/Walk-In-tubs/APWOL3655H5PR
  • Additional AI research evidence94 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    3. AI research evidence record google:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    6. AI research evidence record google:c1
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    8. AI research evidence record google:c5
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    16. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    17. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    18. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    19. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    20. AI research evidence record google:c2
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    22. AI research evidence record google:c5
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    24. AI research evidence record google:c6
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    26. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    27. AI research evidence record google:c2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record google:c7
    31. AI research evidence record google:c8
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    33. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    34. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    35. AI research evidence record google:c3
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    38. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    39. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    40. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    42. AI research evidence record google:c2
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    45. AI research evidence record google:c1
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    47. AI research evidence record google:c5
    48. AI research evidence record google:c7
    49. AI research evidence record google:c8
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    52. AI research evidence record google:c6
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record google:c3
    55. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    57. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    59. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    64. AI research evidence record google:c1
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    66. AI research evidence record google:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    70. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    71. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    73. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    74. AI research evidence record google:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record google:c8
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    78. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    80. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    81. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    82. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    83. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    90. AI research evidence record google:c7
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    93. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Independent Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence94 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    3. AI research evidence record google:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    6. AI research evidence record google:c1
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    8. AI research evidence record google:c5
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    16. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    17. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    18. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    19. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    20. AI research evidence record google:c2
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    22. AI research evidence record google:c5
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    24. AI research evidence record google:c6
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    26. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    27. AI research evidence record google:c2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record google:c7
    31. AI research evidence record google:c8
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    33. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    34. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    35. AI research evidence record google:c3
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    38. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    39. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    40. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    42. AI research evidence record google:c2
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    45. AI research evidence record google:c1
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    47. AI research evidence record google:c5
    48. AI research evidence record google:c7
    49. AI research evidence record google:c8
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    52. AI research evidence record google:c6
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record google:c3
    55. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    57. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    59. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    64. AI research evidence record google:c1
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    66. AI research evidence record google:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    70. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    71. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    73. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    74. AI research evidence record google:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record google:c8
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    78. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    80. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    81. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    82. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    83. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    90. AI research evidence record google:c7
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    93. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 13, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
20
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#9

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

1 independent · 19 company-owned

Evidence support

19 direct · 1 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 91cb9293c90637738cf7aa234c1e77b943e428791ce3a2d4a1f74ff39cd78ad6