AI Consensus Fit Review

American Standard Walk-In Baths for Ultra-Low Entry Safety - AI Consensus Fit Review

American Standard Walk-In Baths is a good but not fully verified fit for Ultra-Low Entry Safety.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
American Standard Walk-In Baths for Ultra-Low Entry Safety hero image
walk-in-tubsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

American Standard Walk-In Baths is a good but not fully verified fit for Ultra-Low Entry Safety. Three of seven AI platforms (Google, OpenAI, Perplexity) named American Standard during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 5.3 and a best rank of 5. The strongest reason to consider this brand is its outward-opening watertight door combined with a chair-height seat, built-in grab bar, textured floor, and rapid-drain option—features that directly address balance and limited leg-lift concerns. The main limitation is that American Standard does not publish exact step-in threshold heights for its models, and independent reviews report thresholds ranging from 3 to 7 inches depending on the model. For buyers who need a verified sub-3-inch entry, competitors like Kohler (advertised 3-inch threshold) or Boca (2-inch threshold) may be better documented choices.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (Google, OpenAI, Perplexity)
Share of included platform responses42.9% (3 of 7)
Average listed rank5.33
Best listed rank5
Relevant product/model/planGelcoat Premium Series 30 x 52-inch outward-opening-door walk-in bathtub, model SS9OD5230LS
Overall use-case fitGood (4 of 7 platforms rated "good"; 2 "uncertain"; 1 "mixed")
Research date2026-08-13

Why American Standard Walk-In Baths Qualified for This Study

American Standard Walk-In Baths qualified because three AI platforms independently named the brand during the ranking stage for best walk-in tubs with low step-in thresholds. The relevant product is the Gelcoat Premium Series 30 x 52-inch outward-opening-door walk-in bathtub, model SS9OD5230LS, which multiple platforms identified as the most relevant configuration for ultra-low entry safety [1].

The model was evaluated against eight category criteria: step-in threshold height, entry width, door design, grab bar placement, floor traction, seat height, leak protection, and installation requirements. The platforms assessed American Standard's fit specifically for seniors with balance issues, neuropathy, or limited leg lift who need the lowest practical tub entry height.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement: The outward-opening door is a genuine safety advantage. Five of seven platforms rated the door design as an advantage. The Gelcoat Premium Series features a full-sized, watertight outward-opening door described as a partial-transfer design [6]. Outward-opening doors provide more usable approach and exit space than inward-opening models, reducing the risk of door-related falls during entry [7]. DeepSeek specifically noted the 23.5-inch door opening as relatively wide for accessibility [8].

Strong agreement: The safety feature package is well-matched to the target buyer. Five platforms confirmed the model includes a built-in safety grab bar, textured slip-resistant floor, and chair-height contoured seat [10]. The chair-height seat is approximately 17 inches from the tub floor, matching standard toilet height and reducing strain on knees and hips during transfers [13].

Strong agreement: Rapid drainage reduces exit risk. Five platforms cited the Quick Drain/Minute Drain system, which empties the bath in less than two minutes without additional plumbing [14]. This eliminates the most dangerous part of traditional bathing where users must exit over standing water [16].

Majority agreement: Warranty coverage is a strength. The current product page lists a lifetime door-seal warranty, 10-year tub-shell warranty, and 5-year component warranty [6]. This warranty structure was described as the strongest provision offered, particularly the lifetime door-seal coverage [17].

Majority agreement: The 30 x 52-inch footprint fits standard alcoves. The compact dimensions fit standard U.S. bathroom alcoves, with a tub extender available to fit existing standard tub spaces [18].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Critical disagreement: Step-in threshold height. This is the most significant conflict in the evidence. Grok reported a 3-inch threshold based on third-party reviews [20], while Google reported that thresholds vary by model and can reach up to 7 inches, citing independent occupational therapist and review analyses [21]. OpenAI and Anthropic both noted that American Standard does not publish exact threshold heights on official product pages [22]. DeepSeek reported a 19-inch door opening height but clarified this is not the step-in threshold [24]. The official product page describes the door as "low threshold" without providing a measurement [22].

Disagreement: Transfer capability. OpenAI described the model as partial-transfer based on the current product page [22], while older SSOD5230 documentation emphasizes wheelchair transfer support [26]. Anthropic noted the partial-transfer designation but flagged that this does not establish full wheelchair transfer capability [25]. Google described the outward-opening door as supporting "wheelchair-friendly entries" allowing bathers to slide onto the seat [27].

Disagreement: Fit rating. Four platforms rated American Standard as "good" (OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok, Google), two rated it "uncertain" (Perplexity, Kimi), and one rated it "mixed" (DeepSeek). The uncertain ratings stem primarily from the lack of verified threshold specifications and pricing transparency.

Disagreement: Pricing. OpenAI reported a displayed list price of $7,525 for the referenced configuration [22]. Anthropic reported base units starting around $4,462-$5,000 with installed costs ranging $4,000-$12,000 [28]. DeepSeek estimated $6,000-$8,000 for the tub plus $1,000-$3,000 installation [24]. Google reported base tub-only prices near $4,462 and premium models from $7,525 up to $11,825 [21]. Grok and Perplexity found no pricing on the official page [29].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Step-In Threshold Height

Assessment: Unclear/Limitation. American Standard describes the SS9OD5230LS door as having a low threshold, but the exact height is not stated on the current product page or in the SSOD5230 specification document [31]. Independent reviews report thresholds ranging from 3 inches [33] to 7 inches depending on the model [34]. The industry standard for walk-in tubs is 3-7 inches versus 14-18 inches for traditional tubs [35]. This information gap is material for an ultra-low-entry comparison.

Entry Width and Door Design

Assessment: Advantage. The model uses a large, outward-opening watertight door identified as a partial-transfer design [31]. DeepSeek reported a 23.5-inch door opening [37]. Outward opening provides more room at entry and exit, but the exact clear door opening width was not verified across all sources [31].

Grab Bar Placement

Assessment: Advantage. The SSOD5230 documentation lists a 24-inch polished-chrome safety bar, and the product information identifies a built-in safety grab bar [32]. Exact position, diameter, load rating, and whether additional bars can be added were not verified [32].

Floor Traction

Assessment: Advantage. The SSOD5230 documentation specifies a textured tub floor intended to reduce slipping risk [32]. No independent coefficient-of-friction test or mobility-specific safety certification was located [32].

Seat Height and Transfers

Assessment: Advantage. The product has a built-in chair-height contoured seat approximately 17 inches from the tub floor [31]. This matches standard toilet height and reduces strain during sit-down and stand-up transitions [39]. The manufacturer documentation describes it as supporting wheelchair transfer, but the exact seat height and transfer clearances were not verified [32].

Leak Protection

Assessment: Advantage. The door is described as full-sized, watertight, and covered by a lifetime door-seal warranty [31]. Gelcoat models require a threshold-door drain connection; alcove installations may require a tile-flange solution to prevent seepage at the wall [41].

Drain Time and Exit Safety

Assessment: Advantage. The optional Minute Drain/Quick Drain system empties the bath in less than two minutes without additional plumbing [42]. This reduces waiting time before opening the door, but actual drain time depends on installation and operating conditions [42].

Installation Requirements

Assessment: Limitation. Installation requires site-specific plumbing and access planning. The installation manual specifies a minimum 1.5-inch sanitary drain connection for the threshold drain [41]. The 30 x 52 model has access panels and substantial filled operating capacity [32]. Installation hardware is not necessarily included, and an extension or flange kit may be required depending on the bathroom [43]. Professional installation is required, and modifications to existing plumbing may be necessary [37].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Pricing confidence is moderate to low across platforms. The official product page displayed a list price of $7,525 for the referenced 30 x 52-inch outward-opening-door model, but stated that the item was not available for sale on the website [44]. Current transaction price, dealer price, and installation price were not verified [44].

Known cost ranges from independent sources:

Cost ComponentReported RangeSource
Base tub-only price~$4,462-$5,000[45], [46]
Premium Gelcoat/Acrylic models$7,525-$11,825[46]
Fully installed cost$4,000-$12,000[45]
Installation (DeepSeek estimate)$1,000-$3,000[47]
Custom installation fees$2,000-$10,000[46]
Old tub removal/disposal$500-$1,500[45]
Freight fee on returns$100 plus non-refundable original shipping[46]

Contract and cancellation terms: Made-to-order items are nonrefundable per company policy [48]. Financing is available for qualified buyers with 12-month no-interest terms on purchases of $10,000 or more; interest applies after 12 months if the balance remains [45]. Dealer-specific purchase, cancellation, return, labor-warranty, and scheduling terms were not verified [44].

Warranty terms: The current product page lists a lifetime door-seal warranty, 10-year tub-shell warranty, and 5-year components warranty [44]. An older SSOD5230 specification PDF lists a 15-year shell warranty and 10-year component warranty [50]. The applicable warranty depends on the exact SKU, production version, and purchase channel [44]. Google noted that "Liberation" tubs carry a lifetime warranty covering labor, installation, fixtures, and door seals, while other lines carry 10-15 year shell and 5-year component warranties [46].

Best Suited For

American Standard Walk-In Baths is best suited for:

  • Seniors with balance issues, arthritis, or limited leg lift who want a well-established brand with comprehensive warranty and safety features [51]
  • Buyers needing an outward-opening door for easier approach and exit, particularly in bathrooms where an inward-swinging door would be problematic [53]
  • Users who benefit from chair-height seating at approximately 17 inches, matching toilet height and reducing joint strain [55]
  • Bathrooms where a compact 30 x 52-inch footprint and possible retrofit extension are appropriate [56]
  • Buyers who value rapid draining to reduce the time spent waiting before exit [58]
  • Households prioritizing durable, mid-to-premium construction with strong warranty support [60]

Probably Not Best Suited For

American Standard Walk-In Baths is probably not best suited for:

  • Buyers requiring a verified sub-2-inch or otherwise precisely specified entry height [61]
  • Users needing a wide, independently verified clear opening for full wheelchair transfer [61]
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking the absolute lowest cost option—American Standard tubs range $4,000-$12,000 versus competitors at $1,000-$5,000 [64]
  • Buyers who need transparent all-in installed pricing without scheduling an in-home sales consultation [62]
  • Those who need immediate installation without in-home consultation delay [66]
  • Bathrooms with extremely tight layouts where an outward-swinging door cannot clear existing fixtures [62]

When Another Option May Be Better

  • When a verified 3-inch threshold is required: Kohler advertises a 3-inch step-in height as the lowest on the market [67]. American Standard does not publish specific threshold heights [68].
  • When a guaranteed 2-inch threshold is needed: Boca Walk-In Tubs offers a 2-inch threshold for seniors with extremely limited leg lift [69].
  • When budget is under $4,000 installed: Universal, AmeriGlide, or other budget brands offer walk-in tubs at $1,000-$3,000 [70].
  • When the buyer cannot safely lift a foot over any tub threshold: A roll-in or accessible shower may be more appropriate than any walk-in tub [71].
  • When wheelchair transfer space is the priority: Full-transfer models from specialized manufacturers may offer wider doors and better accessibility features [72].
  • When the buyer requires documented threshold specifications before purchase: Some competitors provide detailed threshold specifications online without requiring an in-home evaluation [68].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. What is the measured vertical step-in threshold height for the exact SS9OD5230LS finish and door configuration? [73]
  2. What is the unobstructed clear entry width at the narrowest point? [73]
  3. Is the unit partial-transfer or full-transfer for the exact configuration, and what are the seat-to-door transfer dimensions? [73]
  4. What is the exact seat height from the finished bathroom floor, and can the buyer safely place both feet while seated? [76]
  5. Where exactly is the grab bar located, what is its diameter and load rating, and are additional bars or vertical supports available? [76]
  6. What testing or rating supports the textured-floor traction claim? [76]
  7. Is Quick Drain/Minute Drain included, and what drain, electrical, service-access, and actual drain-time requirements apply? [78]
  8. Does the installation require a threshold-drain connection, tile flange, extension kit, dedicated circuit, or changes to existing plumbing? [80]
  9. What is the complete installed price, including demolition, haul-away, permits, freight, plumbing, electrical work, trim, and warranty labor? [73]
  10. Which warranty terms apply to the exact SKU, and who performs warranty service? [73]
  11. What are the dealer's cancellation, return, damage-claim, installation-delay, and labor-warranty terms? [83]
  12. Can the nonrefundable made-to-order policy be waived if the threshold height or dimensions prove unsuitable after delivery? [83]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

American Standard Walk-In Baths is a good, but not optimally transparent, fit for ultra-low entry safety. The Gelcoat Premium Series 30 x 52-inch outward-opening-door model (SS9OD5230LS) offers essential safety features—outward-opening watertight door, chair-height seat, built-in grab bar, textured floor, and rapid drainage—that align with the target buyer's mobility and balance needs [85].

However, the company's failure to publish exact step-in threshold specifications is a material limitation for buyers seeking the lowest practical entry height [85]. Independent reviews report thresholds ranging from 3 to 7 inches depending on the model [89]. Competitors like Kohler explicitly advertise 3-inch thresholds, and Boca offers 2-inch thresholds [91].

For seniors with severe neuropathy, limited leg lift, or extreme balance concerns, the lack of published threshold data creates uncertainty before a $4,000-$12,000 investment [92]. American Standard is recommended only for buyers who can verify exact specifications during an in-home evaluation and who value brand stability, comprehensive warranty, and the outward-opening door design over the lowest price or fastest purchasing path [88].

The brand's strong warranty (lifetime door seal, 10-year shell, 5-year components on the current page), established reputation, and retrofit design are advantages [85]. But for the specific use case of ultra-low entry safety, the inability to confirm the exact threshold height before purchase means American Standard should not be ranked as the strongest ultra-low-entry choice until those measurements are verified for the purchased configuration [85].

For a broader comparison of low-threshold walk-in tub options, see the Ultra-Low Entry Safety consensus index. You can also browse all walk in tubs coverage for additional brand comparisons.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Grok, and Kimi. Each platform evaluated American Standard Walk-In Baths against eight category criteria for ultra-low entry safety: step-in threshold height, entry width, door design, grab bar placement, floor traction, seat height, leak protection, and installation requirements.

The authoritative research date is 2026-08-13. Platform-reported research dates were 2026-08-13 for six platforms and 2026-04-16 for DeepSeek. The entity ranking statistics reflect only platforms that named American Standard during the ranking discovery stage (Google, OpenAI, Perplexity), while fit ratings reflect all seven platforms that evaluated the entity.

The evidence base includes 23 deduplicated sources: 11 company-owned sources (primarily American Standard product pages, specification sheets, and installation manuals) and 12 independent sources (including SeniorLiving.org, This Old House, ConsumerAffairs, TheSeniorList, RetirementLiving, SafeWise, and Modernize).

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. DeepSeek's research date was 2026-04-16, approximately four months before the authoritative run date of 2026-08-13. This may affect the freshness of DeepSeek's pricing and product information.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Some URLs may have changed or become unavailable since collection.
  • Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions. Perplexity and Kimi both noted that their retrieval of the official American Standard product page was incomplete or failed, resulting in "uncertain" fit ratings based on insufficient evidence.
  • Kimi's search results returned unrelated low-floor vehicle specifications rather than walk-in tub data, creating a complete information gap for that platform's assessment [94].
  • The deterministic identity audit contains qualification notes. The entity and product names supplied by the ranking stage were treated as unverified identity details where official-site retrieval failed [97].
  • No independent testing was located. Safety claims regarding threshold height, floor traction, and fall-risk reduction are primarily manufacturer claims; no independent coefficient-of-friction testing, threshold measurement verification, or mobility-specific safety certification was found in the supplied evidence.
  • Pricing conflicts were not resolved. The displayed list price of $7,525 [98] conflicts with independent reports of base prices near $4,462 [99]. These conflicts may reflect different configurations, finishes, or purchase channels.
  • Warranty conflicts were not resolved. The current product page lists a 10-year shell warranty and 5-year component warranty [98], while an older specification PDF lists 15-year shell and 10-year component warranties [101]. The applicable warranty depends on the exact SKU and production version.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Low floor City minibus Mercedes Sprinter Front low entry: https://omnicar.eu/product/low-floor-city-minibus-mercedes-sprinter/
  • Optimal LFg - Low Floor Advantage: https://www.optimal-ev.com/lfg
  • Low Floor Minibus - ADA Commercial Wheelchair Vans & Gurney Vans: https://www.sunsetvans.com/minibus-low-floor/
  • Additional AI research evidence101 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    3. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    4. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    5. AI research evidence record google:c2
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    12. AI research evidence record google:c2
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    15. AI research evidence record google:c3
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    20. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    21. AI research evidence record google:c1
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    27. AI research evidence record google:c2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    29. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    30. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    33. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    34. AI research evidence record google:c1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    46. AI research evidence record google:c1
    47. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    59. AI research evidence record google:c2
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record google:c1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    65. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    69. AI research evidence record google:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    79. AI research evidence record google:c2
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    84. AI research evidence record google:c1
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    87. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    89. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    90. AI research evidence record google:c1
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    97. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    100. AI research evidence record google:c1
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c2

Independent Sources

  • Walk-In Tub Sizes: How to Choose the Perfect Fit: https://modernize.com/walk-in-tubs/sizes
  • Walk-In Tubs for Seniors: Benefits, Safety & Features: https://renuityhome.com/blog/walk-in-tubs-for-seniors/
  • Walk-In Tubs for Seniors: A Complete Buyers Guide: https://storypoint.com/resources/health-wellness/best-walk-in-bathtubs/
  • American Standard Walk-In Baths Reviews (From First-hand Experiences: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/homeowners/american-standard-walk-in-baths.html
  • 6 Best Walk-In Tubs of 2026 (Tested & Reviewed: https://www.retirementliving.com/best-walk-in-bathtubs
  • American Standard Walk-In Tubs Review and Pricing in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/walk-in-tubs/american-standard-review/
  • American Standard Walk-In Tubs Review and Pricing in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/walk-in-tubs/american-standard/
  • American Standard Walk-In Tub Reviews and Pricing (2026: https://www.theseniorlist.com/walk-in-bathtubs/american-standard/
  • American Standard vs Kohler: A Walk-In Tub Comparison: https://www.theseniorlist.com/walk-in-tubs/compare/american-standard-vs-kohler/
  • Additional AI research evidence101 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    3. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    4. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    5. AI research evidence record google:c2
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    12. AI research evidence record google:c2
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    15. AI research evidence record google:c3
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    20. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    21. AI research evidence record google:c1
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    27. AI research evidence record google:c2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    29. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    30. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    33. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    34. AI research evidence record google:c1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    46. AI research evidence record google:c1
    47. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    59. AI research evidence record google:c2
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record google:c1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    65. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    69. AI research evidence record google:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    79. AI research evidence record google:c2
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    84. AI research evidence record google:c1
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    87. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    89. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    90. AI research evidence record google:c1
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    97. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    100. AI research evidence record google:c1
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c2

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 13, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
23
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#3

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

12 independent · 11 company-owned

Evidence support

11 direct · 12 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 fdc8eb8087348899169c5726969e7bc5d8676fff6f1475fba8eac0db2509c132