AI Consensus Fit Review

Eargo for Rechargeable Hearing Convenience - AI Consensus Fit Review

Eargo is a good but mixed fit for seniors seeking Rechargeable Hearing Convenience.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Eargo for Rechargeable Hearing Convenience hero image
senior-technologyPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

Eargo is a good but mixed fit for seniors seeking Rechargeable Hearing Convenience. Three of seven AI platforms named Eargo during the ranking stage (43% platform share), with an average listed rank of 5.3 and a best rank of 4. The strongest reason to consider Eargo is its completely-in-canal (CIC) rechargeable design that eliminates tiny disposable batteries entirely, with up to 16 hours of stated listening time and an Eargo 8 charging case that provides up to 14 additional full recharges. The main limitation is the non-replaceable integrated battery: independent sources report the battery degrades within roughly 2–3 years, requiring a $295–$395 per-device out-of-warranty replacement fee, and parent company LXE Hearing announced a U.S. wind-down effective July 2026, creating long-term support uncertainty.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, grok)
Share of included platform responses43% (3 of 7)
Average listed rank5.33
Best listed rank4 (anthropic)
Relevant product/model/planEargo 7 and Eargo 8 rechargeable CIC hearing aids
Overall use-case fitGood to mixed (3 platforms: good; 3 platforms: mixed; 1 platform: uncertain)
Research date2026-08-13

Why Eargo Qualified for This Study

Eargo qualified because its rechargeable CIC hearing aids directly address the core buyer need: avoiding tiny disposable batteries. The ranking-stage recommendations named Eargo 7, Eargo 8, and rechargeable IIC models as candidates for rechargeable hearing convenience. All seven platforms evaluated Eargo's fit against the category criteria of battery life per charge, charging case reliability, quick-charge capability, low-battery alerts, comfort, Bluetooth support, warranty, and replacement battery policy.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Rechargeable Hearing Convenience

The most relevant products are the Eargo 7 and Eargo 8 completely-in-canal (CIC) rechargeable hearing aids, sold directly to consumers. Eargo 8 is the newer model with a substantially larger charging case capacity. The Eargo SE is a lower-cost alternative with a smaller case. All models use integrated, non-user-replaceable lithium-ion batteries.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement existed on the core battery-life claim. Eargo 7, Eargo 8, and Eargo SE all deliver up to 16 hours of listening per full charge, according to company materials and independent reviews [1]. This meets typical all-day use for most seniors.

Strong agreement existed on the charging case capacity difference between models. Eargo 8's case provides up to 14 additional full recharges (approximately two weeks of portable power), while Eargo 7's case provides roughly two additional recharges and Eargo SE's case provides about five [1]. Multiple platforms identified Eargo 8 as the stronger choice for charging convenience.

Strong agreement existed on the non-replaceable battery limitation. All platforms that addressed battery replacement noted the integrated batteries cannot be user-replaced, with an expected lifespan of roughly 2–3 years (approximately 1,000 charges) before degradation [12]. Out-of-warranty replacement costs range from $295 to $395 per device depending on model and source.

Strong agreement existed on the 45-day return period. All platforms that addressed returns confirmed Eargo offers a 45-day money-back trial beginning on delivery [15].

Majority agreement existed on the absence of Bluetooth audio streaming. Five platforms reported that Eargo 7, 8, and SE do not support Bluetooth audio streaming for music or phone calls; Bluetooth is limited to app and charger communication [20]. One platform (deepseek) claimed Eargo 7 supports Bluetooth direct streaming, creating a factual conflict.

Majority agreement existed on the warranty terms. Eargo 7 and Eargo 8 include a 2-year limited warranty; Eargo SE includes a 1-year warranty [26]. One platform (kimi) reported only a 1-year warranty for Eargo 7, conflicting with the majority.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Bluetooth streaming capability was directly contradicted. Deepseek reported Eargo 7 "supports Bluetooth direct streaming for iPhone and Android, allowing phone calls and audio streaming" [27]. Four other platforms reported the opposite: Eargo 7, 8, and SE do not support Bluetooth audio streaming [29]. Kimi reported Eargo 8 adds Bluetooth LE Audio streaming but with power tradeoffs [34]. Buyers must verify this directly with Eargo for the exact model.

Quick-charge capability was directly contradicted. Deepseek reported a 15-minute quick charge provides up to 3 hours of use [27]. OpenAI reported no verified quick-charge specification for Eargo 7 or Eargo 8 [35]. Kimi reported no quick-charge capability and a full charge time of approximately 4 hours [34]. Anthropic reported Eargo 7 takes six hours for a full charge with no rapid-charge option [36]. These conflicting claims require direct verification.

Charging case reliability was disputed. Customer reviews on PissedConsumer (2.2 stars, 163 reviews) report recurring charging case failures, devices not charging, and backordered parts [37]. Trustpilot reviews (4 stars, 46 reviews) report positive experiences, including improved Eargo 8 case design with a hinged lid and secure click-in placement [38]. Independent testing reported an Eargo 7 case deep-sleep issue when the case battery was low [40].

Company operational status created material uncertainty. Anthropic reported that LXE Hearing, Eargo's parent company, announced a U.S. wind-down effective July 15, 2026, with customer service available through September 15, 2026 [41]. Long-term availability of apps, warranty administration, and replacement parts is uncertain. Other platforms did not address this, and it was not confirmed by Eargo-owned sources in the evidence set.

Pricing varied significantly across sources. Reported prices ranged from $1,699 to $2,950 per pair depending on model and source [42]. OpenAI reported pricing confidence as "low" with an unclear current Eargo 7 price [44]. Kimi reported Eargo 7 at $2,950 and Eargo 8 at $3,250 [34]. Google reported Eargo 8 at $2,399–$2,699 [43]. Anthropic reported Eargo 7 at approximately $2,550 and Eargo 8 at $2,399–$2,699 [42].

Eargo 7's current availability was unclear. OpenAI noted the official pages reviewed emphasized Eargo 8 and did not clearly establish Eargo 7's current sales availability [44]. Anthropic noted Eargo 8 may be "phased out" in some contexts while promoted as the flagship model [45].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Battery Life per Charge

Eargo 7, 8, and SE all provide up to 16 hours of listening per charge [46]. Independent testing confirmed the 16-hour figure for Eargo 7 [47]. Actual runtime varies with use, settings, streaming, and battery aging. Some users report battery life dropping to 10–12 hours after a year of use [58] or 8–10 hours after 15–16 months [59].

Charging Case Capacity and Reliability

Eargo 8's case provides up to 14 additional full recharges (approximately two weeks of portable power) [46]. Eargo 7's case provides approximately two additional recharges [47]. Eargo SE's case provides about five [50]. Eargo 8 supports USB-C and wireless charging [46]. Customer reports on case reliability are mixed, with some reporting frequent failures and others reporting improved Eargo 8 case design [60].

Quick-Charge Capability

Conflicting reports exist. Deepseek reported a 15-minute charge provides up to 3 hours of use [51]. OpenAI and Kimi reported no verified quick-charge specification [63]. Anthropic reported Eargo 7 requires six hours for a full charge with no rapid-charge option [64]. This must be verified directly.

Low-Battery Alerts

The Eargo app provides low-battery notifications. Eargo 7 app prompts users when charger or devices fall below 15–25% battery [65]. Eargo 8 app alerts when the charger drops below 10% and devices below thresholds [67]. Alerts require Bluetooth connectivity and active app engagement [65]. Kimi reported voice alerts for battery status [57]. No audible in-device low-battery warning was confirmed across all sources.

Comfort and Form Factor

Eargo 7 and 8 use completely-in-canal designs with soft silicone tips, described as virtually invisible [46]. Consumer Reports rated Eargo 7 "very comfortable" and "virtually invisible" [57]. The small size creates challenges for seniors with vision or dexterity impairments [71].

Bluetooth Support

The Eargo app uses Bluetooth Low Energy to communicate with the charger and devices for battery information, settings, and updates [73]. Most platforms report no Bluetooth audio streaming for Eargo 7, 8, or SE [74]. Deepseek contradicts this [51]. Kimi reports Eargo 8 adds Bluetooth LE Audio streaming [57].

Warranty and Replacement Policy

Eargo 7 and 8 include a 2-year limited warranty; Eargo SE includes a 1-year warranty [79]. The warranty covers defects, accidental damage, and loss with associated fees [81]. Out-of-warranty replacement costs $295–$395 per device depending on model [82]. The May 13, 2025 warranty policy describes $395 replacement fees for specified lost or damaged Eargo 7 or Eargo 8 devices or chargers [82].

Water and Dust Resistance

Eargo 8 has an IP68 rating (dust/water/sweat resistant, submersion capable). Eargo 7 has an IPX7 rating (water resistant to 1 meter for 30 minutes). Eargo SE has an IP54 rating [86]. All are water-resistant but not waterproof.

Sound Quality in Noise

Independent lab testing by HearAdvisor rated Eargo 7 at B grade (SoundScore 3.1/5) and Eargo 8 at C grade (SoundScore 2.8/5). Speech-in-noise performance scored 0.4/5 for Eargo 7 and 0.3/5 for Eargo 8, well below average [88]. This is a material limitation for seniors in restaurants or social settings.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Pricing confidence is low to moderate across platforms. Reported prices vary:

ModelReported Price RangeSource
Eargo 7$2,550–$2,950 per pair[90]
Eargo 8$2,399–$3,250 per pair[90]
Eargo SE$1,650–$1,699 per pair[90]

OpenAI reported an older Eargo source listing self-fitting products at $1,950–$2,950 and noted the exact Eargo 7 and Eargo 8 price is unclear until confirmed at checkout [95]. Kimi reported Eargo 7 at $2,950 and Eargo 8 at $3,250 [92]. Google reported Eargo 8 at $2,399–$2,699 [93].

Ongoing and replacement costs:

  • Out-of-warranty repair or replacement: $295 per device for Eargo SE; $395 per device for Eargo 7 or Eargo 8 [96]
  • Loss/damage deductible under warranty: $295 for Eargo SE; $395 for Eargo 8 [93]
  • Replacement eartips, wax guards, and cleaning supplies require ongoing purchase [95]
  • No subscription fees required [92]

Contract and cancellation terms:

  • 45-day return period beginning on delivery [100]
  • Lost or substantially damaged devices can reduce the refund or make return unavailable [96]
  • Financing available through Bread Pay for 12–36 month plans; APRs range from 0.00% to 34.99% [95]
  • Monthly payments starting around $26–$88 [90]
  • Veterans discount: 20% on Eargo 8, 10% on SE; healthcare workers discount: 10% [90]

Best Suited For

Eargo is best suited for seniors with mild-to-moderate hearing loss who:

  • Prioritize a virtually invisible, discreet CIC design [103]
  • Want to eliminate handling tiny disposable batteries entirely [103]
  • Need all-day battery life (up to 16 hours) without mid-day recharging [103]
  • Value a large charging case reserve for travel (Eargo 8's 14 recharges) [103]
  • Are comfortable with smartphone app-based controls and self-fitting [111]
  • Appreciate a 45-day return period and direct-to-consumer support [112]
  • Live primarily in quiet environments where speech-in-noise performance is less critical [114]

Probably Not Best Suited For

Eargo is probably not best suited for:

  • Seniors with severe hearing loss beyond the mild-to-moderate range [116]
  • Buyers requiring Bluetooth audio streaming for music, podcasts, or phone calls [119]
  • Seniors with significant dexterity or vision impairments who cannot manage tiny CIC devices [123]
  • Users in noisy environments where speech clarity is critical [125]
  • Buyers seeking long-term device lifespan beyond 3 years due to non-replaceable batteries [127]
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking lower total cost of ownership [130]
  • Seniors requiring rapid customer support given LXE Hearing's announced U.S. wind-down [131]
  • Users needing clearly documented quick-charge capability for emergency top-ups [132]

When Another Option May Be Better

Consider alternatives when:

  • Longer battery runtime is needed: Yeasound RIC800 offers 31 hours; Sennheiser All-Day Clear Slim offers 16 hours with better feature balance [133]
  • Portable case charging for travel is essential: Lucid Fio offers 64 hours total with case; Lucid Engage offers 16 hours plus case [134]
  • Budget is a primary constraint: Entry-level rechargeable RIC models at $600–$1,500 per pair may be better [133]
  • Bluetooth audio streaming is required: Standard receiver-in-canal OTC models like Jabra Enhance may be better [135]
  • Severe hearing loss requires maximum amplification: Prescription RIC or BTE devices are necessary [137]
  • Clinician fitting and follow-up are needed: Traditional prescription rechargeable hearing aids through an audiologist are better [138]
  • Physical volume controls or telecoil functionality are needed: Consider Oticon or Phonak [139]

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Is Eargo 7 currently sold new in the United States, and what is the exact delivered price? [140]
  2. Does the quoted price include the charger, power adapter, eartips, cleaning supplies, shipping, and taxes? [140]
  3. What quick-charge time and usable runtime are guaranteed for the exact model? Conflicting reports exist [141].
  4. Does the exact model stream phone calls, music, or television audio over Bluetooth, or is Bluetooth limited to app and charger communication? [145]
  5. What audible, visual, and app-based low-battery alerts are available without a smartphone? [146]
  6. How long is the charger covered, and what is the exact replacement cost after warranty expiration? [148]
  7. What loss, accidental-damage, moisture, earwax, and consumable-part exclusions apply? [150]
  8. Are replacement eartips, microphone covers, cables, or other consumables routinely required, and what do they cost? [140]
  9. Can the buyer receive hands-on fitting or setup help if inserting the CIC devices is difficult? [140]
  10. What happens to warranty claims, app availability, and parts supply if LXE Hearing's U.S. wind-down proceeds? [151]
  11. How does the battery hold up after 2–3 years, and what is the cost to service or replace? [152]
  12. Is the buyer's hearing loss appropriate for an OTC self-fitting product, or should an audiologist evaluate it first? [140]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Eargo is a good but mixed fit for seniors prioritizing rechargeable hearing convenience. The core proposition is well aligned: no disposable batteries, up to 16 hours of stated listening time, app-based battery monitoring, a 45-day return period, and a discreet CIC form factor. Eargo 8 is the stronger choice for this use case because its case provides up to 14 recharges, substantially improving travel and backup convenience.

However, three material concerns temper the recommendation. First, the non-replaceable integrated battery degrades within roughly 2–3 years, requiring $295–$395 per-device replacement costs [154]. Second, independent lab testing shows weak speech-in-noise performance (0.3–0.4/5), limiting real-world usefulness in noisy settings [157]. Third, parent company LXE Hearing announced a U.S. wind-down effective July 2026, creating uncertainty about long-term app, warranty, and parts support [159].

Eargo is best for seniors with mild-to-moderate hearing loss in quiet environments who prioritize invisibility and eliminating battery changes above all else. Buyers requiring Bluetooth streaming, rapid charging, long-term durability, or established company stability should consider alternatives. Use the 45-day trial to test charging case reliability and battery performance before committing.

For a broader comparison of rechargeable hearing aid options, see the Rechargeable Hearing Convenience consensus index. For other senior technology categories, visit the senior technology directory.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, and Google) that evaluated Eargo against the category criteria for rechargeable hearing convenience. Each platform provided citations from company-owned and independent sources. The ranking statistics reflect which platforms named Eargo during the ranking discovery stage (3 of 7 platforms). The research date is 2026-08-13.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform mention counts differ from evaluation counts: All seven platforms evaluated Eargo's fit, but only three platforms (anthropic, deepseek, grok) named Eargo during the ranking discovery stage. Platform mentions measure ranking-stage visibility, not fit quality.
  • Platform-reported research dates differ: DeepSeek reported a research date of 2026-04-27, while all other platforms reported 2026-08-13. The authoritative run date is 2026-08-13.
  • Conflicting product information: Bluetooth streaming capability, quick-charge specifications, pricing, and Eargo 7 availability were directly contradicted across platforms. These conflicts are disclosed but not resolved.
  • Company operational uncertainty: The LXE Hearing wind-down was reported by one platform (anthropic) and not confirmed by Eargo-owned sources in the evidence set.
  • Source validation: Supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • AI agreement does not prove product quality: Agreement among AI platforms reflects the supplied evidence base, not independent verification of product performance.
  • No personal testing: This review does not include firsthand testing of Eargo devices. All claims are sourced from the supplied citations.
  • Pricing may be stale: Reported prices range from $1,650 to $3,250 per pair depending on model and source. Exact current pricing must be confirmed at checkout.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Eargo 7 - Official Product Page: https://eargo.com/hearing-aids/eargo-7
  • Shop Eargo 8 Hearing Aids: https://www.eargo.com/eargo-8/
  • Additional AI research evidence159 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    6. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    8. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    10. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    11. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    14. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    18. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    19. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    22. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    23. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    24. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    27. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    28. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    31. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    33. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    34. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c27
    43. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    51. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    52. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    53. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    54. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    55. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    56. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    57. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.3.9
    59. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    76. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    77. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    78. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    85. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c27
    91. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    92. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    93. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    94. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    99. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    100. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    105. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    107. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    108. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    110. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    113. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    116. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    117. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    118. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    119. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    121. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    122. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    123. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    124. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    125. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    126. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    127. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    128. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    129. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    130. AI research evidence record anthropic:c27
    131. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    132. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    133. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    134. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    135. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    136. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    137. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    138. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    139. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    140. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    141. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    142. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    143. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    144. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    145. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    146. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    147. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    148. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    149. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    150. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    151. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    152. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    153. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    154. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    155. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    156. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    157. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    158. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    159. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26

Independent Sources

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 13, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
45
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#6

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

34 independent · 11 company-owned

Evidence support

41 direct · 4 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 cc08258e7e965122a57190ec7e4d3a030203b93c5faaa36c2928ad960a9d2083