AI Consensus Fit Review

Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Stairlift Review for Shared Stairways

The Harmar Pinnacle SL300 is a good fit for Shared Household Clearance when the staircase is straight and the lift is ordered with its automatic folding rail.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Stairlift Review for Shared Stairways hero image
stairliftsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

The Harmar Pinnacle SL300 is a good fit for Shared Household Clearance when the staircase is straight and the lift is ordered with its automatic folding rail. Six of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, and it ranked first on every platform that listed it. Its strongest advantage is a compact parked profile — 11 inches from the wall folded, or 13 5/8 inches with the folding rail [1]. The main limitation is that clearance is configuration- and installation-dependent: the folding rail, power footrest, and chassis sensor are options, no fixed installed price is published, and no cited independent source verifies real-world passable stair width, armrest folding effort, or sensor sensitivity.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage6 of 7 platforms (anthropic, google, grok, kimi, openai, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses85.7%
Average listed rank1.0
Best listed rank1
Relevant product/model/planHarmar Pinnacle SL300 Straight Stairlift with optional automatic folding rail
Overall use-case fitGood — with mixed and uncertain ratings from two platforms
Research date2026-09-27

What Changed Since August 2026

Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Stairlift moved up from No. 3 to No. 1, and platform mentions increased from 3 to 6. The September 2026 review narrows its focus from the Harmar brand to the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Stairlift specifically, so the earlier SL600 and heavy-duty discussion no longer shapes the buyer guidance. For a straight shared stairway, the recommended setup is unchanged: order the automatic folding rail, which remains optional rather than standard. Reported pricing now includes $3,515 for a base unit, while the earlier $2,500–$4,000 installed estimate is no longer repeated. Track length is now stated as 15 feet 6 inches to 36 feet. Clearance, footrest power, and sensor detail still require dealer confirmation, so the practical buying risks have not materially shifted. Differences between the two editions reflect what each article reports; they do not by themselves prove that the product, service, or price changed.

The August 2026 review preserves the earlier article for reference.

Why Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Stairlift Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 qualify for a shared household clearance stairlift study?
  • How many AI platforms named the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 during the ranking stage?

The Harmar Pinnacle SL300 qualified because it was named by six of the seven included platforms during ranking discovery and placed first on every platform that listed it [2]. That is a unanimous first-place result among the platforms that named it, but it is not a quality verdict — it reflects how consistently platforms associate the SL300 with folding stairlift queries.

The qualification rests on the product's published folding profile. Harmar specifies an 11-inch folded width from the wall for the SL300 and 13 5/8 inches with a folding rail, with the rail mounting about 1 inch from the wall and standing about 3 inches tall when folded [2]. Harmar also states that a folding rail can help avoid obstructions near doorways, walls, or walkways [5].

Two platforms qualified the entity with caveats rather than endorsements. DeepSeek rated the fit "mixed" and could not retrieve SL300-specific folded depth, sensor sensitivity, armrest force, or warranty documents from the public Harmar page it reached [6]. Kimi rated the fit "uncertain" because its retrieved results were UK property-clearance pages with no stairlift content, and its Harmar retrieval failed (kimi:harmar-site-unverified). Both remain in the study because they named the entity during ranking.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Shared Household Clearance

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Harmar Pinnacle SL300 configuration is best for keeping stairs passable for other household members?
  • Is the automatic folding rail included on the Harmar Pinnacle SL300, or does it cost extra?

The configuration that matters for this use case is the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Straight Stairlift with the optional automatic folding rail. Every platform that specified a product named a folding-rail variant, and several named the SL300FR designation explicitly [7].

The folding rail is not standard equipment. Harmar's product specifications list it as an available option, and the automatic folding rail is described as operating during ascent and descent without additional switches or controls [8]. Harmar states its folding rail is automatic and does not interrupt travel or produce loud beeps in use [10].

The base SL300 is a straight-run product. Harmar directs curved, spiral, or multi-flight staircases toward a curved model such as the Helix [11]. The SL300 supports inclines from 27 to 52 degrees, with inclines above 45 degrees potentially requiring local jurisdiction approval, and track lengths from 15 feet 6 inches to 36 feet [12].

Weight capacity is 300 pounds [13]. The SL600 is the higher-capacity sibling at 350 pounds, and one platform recommends it when a household member exceeds 300 pounds [13].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 does well for shared stairways?
  • Is the Harmar Pinnacle SL300's folded width consistent across AI platform research?

Platforms agreed on the folded dimensions, the folding-rail option, the warranty structure, and the straight-stair limitation. Agreement here reflects repeated citation of the same manufacturer materials, not independent verification.

On folded width, the 11-inch figure without the rail and the 13 5/8-inch figure with the rail appear across OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok, Perplexity, and Google responses [15]. Independent dealer listings repeat the same numbers [19].

On warranty, platforms consistently report two years for parts, ten years for the gear rack, and one year for supplied batteries [20]. The owner manual states that labor, maintenance, adjustments, consequential damage, outdoor installations, and commercial installations are excluded under the cited warranty terms [20].

On the straight-stair limitation, platforms agreed the SL300 cannot serve curved or multi-flight stairways [22].

On obstruction sensing, platforms agreed a footrest obstruction sensor is standard and a chassis obstruction sensor is optional [15]. No platform supplied a sensitivity rating or detection envelope.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did some AI platforms rate the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 as only a mixed or uncertain fit for shared household clearance?
  • Does the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 have an automatic footrest, and do platforms agree?

Fit ratings diverged. Google and Grok rated the SL300 a strong fit; OpenAI, Anthropic, and Perplexity rated it good; DeepSeek rated it mixed; Kimi rated it uncertain. No platform rated it poor.

The battery backup cycle count conflicts. Harmar's website states up to 60 cycles during a power outage [25], while some promotional and dealer materials state 40 cycles [26]. Harmar notes actual performance depends on battery condition, passenger load, and rail length [25].

The incline range conflicts. Current specification material shows 27 to 52 degrees with a note that above 45 degrees may require local approval [28], while one independent directory lists 32 to 45 degrees [30].

The automatic footrest is the sharpest uncertainty. OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google all describe the power folding footrest as an option rather than standard equipment [28]. DeepSeek could not confirm a power footrest is available on the SL300 at all and noted the ranking-stage list associates powered footrest language with the SL600 [33]. Perplexity reported that public sources do not clearly verify an automatic footrest for the SL300 [34].

Armrest folding ease is unquantified across every platform. No cited source provides a folding force, mechanism description, or one-handed operation assessment [28].

Kimi's research retrieved UK house-clearance service pages rather than stairlift specifications, so its findings on folded depth, sensors, and warranty are unverified rather than contradictory (kimi:ukhouseclearance-1, kimi:householdclearancenearme-2).

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much stair width does the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 leave when folded with the automatic folding rail?
  • What obstruction sensors does the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 include for shared stairway safety?

Folded depth and parked footprint are the SL300's clearest advantages for this use case. Harmar specifies 11 inches from the wall folded and 13 5/8 inches with the folding rail, with the rail 1 inch from the wall and 3 inches tall [36]. One independent installation document states minimum clearance with the folding rail is 3 inches, with the folding section set 3 inches or more from the wall to leave 1/2 inch clearance at the gas spring [37]. These figures describe the lift, not the remaining passable width in a specific home.

Folding rail availability is confirmed but optional. Harmar states the rail helps avoid obstructions near doorways, walls, or walkways [38]. The automatic version activates during travel and stops when the hand control is released [39]. One platform notes the folding rail remains in the up position when the chair is not at the bottom of the stairs [40].

Automatic footrest capability is a limitation. The standard unit ships with a manual folding footrest operated by gripping the front end and moving it up or down [39]. A power folding footrest is listed as an option [36]. If the power footrest meets an obstruction, a self-resetting fuse triggers with a 30-second reset time [41]. Whether the automatic folding rail waits for that reset, or whether stair access stays blocked during it, is not resolved in the cited sources [41].

Armrest folding ease is unclear. The owner's manual instructs users to fold up the seat, footrest, and armrests to minimize obstruction, but no cited source quantifies the force required or confirms one-handed operation [39].

Obstruction sensors are partly standard. A footrest obstruction sensor is standard and provides an audible alert; a chassis obstruction sensor covering top and bottom edges is optional and, per the owner's manual, available only on units with the optional folding rail [39]. Harmar does not publish a sensitivity level or detection envelope [36].

Installation fit requires dealer measurement. The SL300 is designed for straight staircases without curves, with an incline range of 27 to 52 degrees and track lengths from 15 feet 6 inches to 36 feet [36]. Dealer measurement is required to confirm stair width, landings, bottom clearance, rail position, and door or walkway clearance [36].

Warranty coverage is neutral for this use case. Two years parts, ten years gear rack, one year battery, with labor, maintenance, adjustments, outdoor use, and commercial use excluded [44]. One independent dealer listing reports a 1-year labor warranty alongside the 10-year gear warranty [46].

Shared-household operation during outages is an advantage for the rider, not for clearance. Harmar states the battery system can provide up to 60 trips during a power outage [47]. This keeps the lift user from being stranded on the stairs, which indirectly avoids blocking the stairway, but it does not increase clearance for other household members.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 cost installed, and how much does the automatic folding rail add?
  • Are there ongoing service, battery, or inspection costs for the Harmar Pinnacle SL300?

No manufacturer MSRP or publicly fixed installed price was identified on the cited official product materials. Harmar directs buyers to authorized dealers and requests a quote [48]. Pricing confidence is low across OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and Kimi; Grok and Google report moderate confidence from dealer listings.

Dealer-reported figures, which are not authoritative and vary by region and configuration, include a base unit around $3,515 on sale or $3,895 installed, with a folding rail option near $1,860 per side (grok:9). Another platform reports a typical installed range of $3,000 to $4,500, rising to roughly $5,250 for a right-handed SL300 with folding rail [49]. Third-party listings also show installed pricing and folding-rail surcharges [51].

Options that may add cost include the automatic folding rail, chassis obstruction sensor, power folding footrest, and power swivel, because they are listed as options rather than standard equipment [48].

Ongoing costs are not publicly quantified. Battery replacement is reported on average every one to two years [54]. Dealer inspection every one to two years is recommended for continued full-capacity operation [54]. Labor, service calls, maintenance, and adjustments are excluded from the cited warranty terms [55].

Contract and cancellation terms are unclear. No standard nationwide contract, cancellation, rental, or removal terms were identified in the cited official sources [48]. Warranty registration is described in the owner manual as requiring return of the warranty form within ten days of purchase or installation, and buyers should confirm current requirements with the dealer [55]. One platform notes custom straight cuts are often final sales once fabrication begins, with dealer-specific return and restocking policies [49].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 best suited for in a shared household?
  • Is the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 a good choice for a narrow straight staircase used by multiple family members?

The SL300 is best suited to indoor, straight residential stairways where other household members need the stair path kept as open as practicable, and where the buyer will order the automatic folding rail after a dealer site measurement [57].

It also suits households prioritizing a compact parked footprint near a doorway, wall, or walkway [58], buyers who value a lubrication-free drive system that avoids grease on shared steps [59], and households with a lower landing that needs to stay clear of trip hazards (grok:3).

Buyers who can obtain a dealer measurement and are comfortable treating several convenience features as options are the intended audience [57]. Households with a rider under 300 pounds fit the capacity limit [61].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 for shared household clearance?
  • Is the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 unsuitable for curved staircases or heavier riders?

Curved, spiral, or multi-flight staircases are out of scope; Harmar directs those situations toward a curved model such as the Helix [62].

Buyers needing the narrowest available folded footprint or more premium standard convenience features may prefer the SL600, which Harmar lists as folding to 10.5 inches when the seat and footrest are folded [64]. Households with a member above 300 pounds need the SL600's 350-pound capacity [63].

Households requiring fully automatic stair clearing in one operation should look elsewhere, because the standard SL300 uses manual armrest and footrest folding with no powered armrest option [66].

Outdoor or commercial installations are excluded from the SL300 warranty and not approved under the cited warranty terms [67].

Buyers who need transparent installed pricing, independently tested clearance data, or stronger publicly documented service and labor coverage should weigh other manufacturers [64].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 for a curved staircase or a heavier rider?
  • When should a buyer choose the Harmar Pinnacle SL600 or Helix instead of the SL300?

Choose the Harmar Pinnacle SL600 when the household needs a narrower folded configuration or a larger, more premium straight-stairlift platform; Harmar lists the SL600 as folding to 10.5 inches when the seat and footrest are folded [70]. The SL600 also covers riders up to 350 pounds [71].

Choose the Harmar Helix or another curved stairlift when the staircase has curves, turns, or landings [72]. The ranking-stage list also names a UP Stairlift Curved Modular model as a curved alternative [73].

Consider another manufacturer when the buyer requires transparent installed pricing, independently tested clearance data, or stronger publicly documented service and labor coverage [70]. One platform also suggests comparing brands that publish warranty and folding-rail specifications before choosing [74].

If the staircase is so tight that only a fully verified minimal-footprint solution will work, a different product may be needed because public sources do not guarantee installed passage width [75].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with a Harmar Pinnacle SL300 dealer before signing a contract?
  • How can a buyer verify the Harmar Pinnacle SL300's folded clearance and warranty terms before purchase?

Ask the dealer for the measured remaining stair width with the SL300, seat, footrest, and selected folding rail fully parked [76]. Confirm the actual folded dimensions at the top and bottom landings, including armrests, seat, footrest, rail, and any nearby obstruction [76].

Confirm whether the automatic folding rail is included in the quote and whether it is powered automatically throughout its movement [76]. Confirm whether the quoted configuration includes a power folding footrest or only a manually folding footrest [76].

Ask what the chassis obstruction sensor detects and what its tested clearance or sensitivity is [76]. Ask whether the footrest obstruction sensor alone is adequate for the household, given the chassis sensor is optional and available only with the folding rail [77].

Confirm the exact stair incline, rail length, and bottom clearance the dealer will certify as compatible, and whether installation requires relocation of handrails, electrical work, structural changes, or local approval [76].

Ask what labor, service-call, battery, removal, transfer, and maintenance charges are excluded from the warranty, and what the dealer's delivery, installation, cancellation, return, rental, and removal terms are [76].

Ask the dealer to demonstrate folding and unfolding the armrests, seat, footrest, and rail for the household members who will use the stairs [76]. Confirm whether the 10-year gear rack warranty transfers to subsequent homeowners if the property is sold [79].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The Harmar Pinnacle SL300 is a good fit for Shared Household Clearance, provided the home has a straight indoor staircase and the buyer specifies the automatic folding rail after a site measurement [80]. Its compact parked profile is a meaningful advantage, and six of seven platforms named it during ranking with a first-place rank on each.

The fit is not unconditional. Clearance is configuration- and installation-dependent, the folding rail and power footrest are options, no fixed installed price is published, and no cited independent source verifies real-world passable stair width, armrest folding effort, or sensor sensitivity [80]. Two platforms rated the fit mixed or uncertain, and the automatic footrest question remains unresolved across sources.

Buyers should treat the SL300 as a strong candidate for a straight shared stairway, not a guaranteed clearance solution, and should require model-specific written specifications and a dealer measurement before purchase.

How This Review Was Produced

This review evaluates only the Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Stairlift for the Shared Household Clearance use case. It is not a broad company review. The study used the run research date of 2026-09-27 and drew on fit-research responses from seven platforms: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Grok, Kimi, DeepSeek, and Perplexity.

Platform mentions in the ranking stage count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery; all included platforms evaluated fit. The entity was named by six of seven platforms and ranked first on each of those six.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the supplied catalog, so manufacturer claims in this review should not be read as independently verified. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

Methodology Limitations

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: Anthropic reported 2026-01-15 and DeepSeek reported 2026-06-11, while the remaining platforms reported 2026-09-27. These dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions, and no failed fetch was used as a verified domain key. Company-name variants were collapsed onto one canonical brand before minimum-mentions qualification.

Kimi's retrieved results were UK property-clearance pages with no stairlift content, and its Harmar retrieval failed, so its findings are unverified rather than contradictory. DeepSeek ran without search enabled, so its findings are platform-reported from model knowledge and the ranking-stage context.

The research evidence is primarily manufacturer-owned material. Independent evidence on clearance, reliability, sensor performance, and folding effort was not identified. No cited source verifies the actual passable stair width after installation in a specific residence, and no fixed price, standard installed package, cancellation policy, or recurring service cost is publicly disclosed.

See the broader Shared Stairways consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Explore more stairlifts guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

  • Harmar Pinnacle SL300 - Discover My Mobility Specifications: https://discovermymobility.com/store/stairwaylifts/harmar/PINNACLE-SL300/index.html
  • Harmar Stairlift Cost (2026): Prices & Models: https://www.chairliftforstairs.com/harmar-stairlift-cost
  • SL300 Installation Manual - Folding Rail Clearance: https://www.discountramps.com/images/art/SL300-IM-DOC__1.pdf
  • Pinnacle SL300 Owner's Manual - Maintenance and Features: https://www.discountramps.com/images/art/SL300-OM-DOC__1.pdf
  • Harmar Pinnacle SL300 Straight Stair Lift - Lifeway Mobility: https://www.lifewaymobility.com/
  • Harmar Pinnacle Stair Lift SL300 - Mobility Mart Specifications: https://www.mobilitymart.com/mobility-aids/stair-lifts/p/sl300/
  • See the Folding Rail in Action! | Harmar SL300 Safe Exit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xqc-UxT28PI
  • Additional AI research evidence81 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    6. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    7. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    14. AI research evidence record google:1.3.9
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    21. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    23. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    40. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    42. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    49. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    50. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    51. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    56. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    60. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    62. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    65. AI research evidence record google:1.3.9
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    68. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    69. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    74. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    78. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    81. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence81 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    6. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    7. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    14. AI research evidence record google:1.3.9
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    21. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    23. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    40. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    42. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    49. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    50. AI research evidence record google:1.3.4
    51. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    56. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    60. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    62. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    65. AI research evidence record google:1.3.9
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    68. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    69. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    74. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    78. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    81. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1

Verify This Research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
September 27, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
32
Ranking mentions
6 of 7
Platform share
86%
Final consensus rank
#1

Research trail and source mix

Configured platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

12 independent · 18 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

18 direct · 14 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 0f5b06025cb6f83be12a327010d63db7e0268d8556194988bee9ad744d63fecd