AI Consensus Fit Review

Stannah Siena Review for Shared Stairways

Stannah Siena is a good fit for Shared Household Clearance, not a guaranteed one.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Stannah Siena Review for Shared Stairways hero image
stairliftsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

Stannah Siena is a good fit for Shared Household Clearance, not a guaranteed one. Three of the seven platforms in this study named it during ranking discovery, at an average listed rank of 4.0 and a best rank of 2. Its strongest case is the published 14.5-inch folded depth on the straight model, combined with a powered footrest and an optional automatically retracting rail for stairs with a door or walkway at the bottom [1]. The main limitation is that the 14.5-inch figure is not a universal installed footprint: rail-start position, armrest behavior, and obstruction-sensor sensitivity are not publicly quantified, so the remaining walkway must be measured on site [3].

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (anthropic, google, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank4.0
Best listed rank2 (perplexity)
Relevant product/model/planStannah Siena Straight Stairlift (Model 600) or Siena Curved Stairlift, preferably with powered footrest and, where needed, an automatic retracting rail
Overall use-case fitGood (openai, anthropic, perplexity); strong (google, grok); mixed (deepseek, kimi)
Research date2026-09-27

What Changed Since August 2026

Stannah Siena remained at No. 4, and platform mentions were unchanged at 3. The September 2026 review narrows its focus from Stannah generally to the Stannah Siena specifically, and the buyer-facing description shifts accordingly, with the powered footrest and optional automatic retracting rail now framed as the core shared-clearance configuration. The fit recommendation is otherwise unchanged: still a qualified good fit, not a guaranteed one. Most limitation language carries over. Reported pricing evidence now includes a straight-model range of $4,700–$8,500; the earlier $2,500-$9,000 straight figure is no longer repeated, so buyers should treat published ranges as source-dependent. No recommended configuration changed. Differences between the two editions reflect what each article reports; they do not by themselves prove that the product, service, or price changed.

The August 2026 review preserves the earlier article for reference.

Why Stannah Siena Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Stannah Siena qualify for a shared household clearance stairlift study?
  • How many AI platforms named Stannah Siena in the ranking stage for shared stairways?

Stannah Siena qualified because it was named by three of the seven platforms during ranking discovery and because its published specifications map directly onto the clearance criteria this study scores. It appeared on anthropic (rank 5), google (rank 5), and perplexity (rank 2), giving an average listed rank of 4.0 and a best rank of 2. The remaining four platforms evaluated fit without naming it in the ranking stage, so the mention count is 3 of 7, not 7 of 7.

The qualification is specification-driven rather than reputation-driven. Stannah publishes a 14.5-inch folded depth for the straight Siena and 16 inches for the curved version [4]. Google's sources cite a 13.5-inch (344 mm) folded figure for the Siena 600 and Siena One [7]. Stannah also lists a powered footrest, footrest obstruction sensors, remote controls, and an optional automatically retracting rail [10]. Those are the exact attributes a shared stairway buyer needs to compare.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Shared Household Clearance

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Stannah Siena model and configuration is best for a shared household stairway?
  • Is the powered footrest or retracting rail included on the Stannah Siena straight model, or does it cost extra?

The relevant configuration is the Stannah Siena Straight Stairlift (Model 600) with a powered footrest, and with an automatically retracting rail where the stair base opens onto a door or walkway. The straight model is the one with the published 14.5-inch folded depth; the curved Siena is listed at 16 inches folded and is the weaker shared-clearance option [11].

Configuration matters more than model name here. Stannah's U.S. pricing page lists footrest obstruction sensors and remote controls as standard features and describes the automatically retracting rail as an additional-cost option for stairs with doors at the bottom [14]. Google's sources describe a linked seat-and-footrest design where lifting the seat raises the footrest, plus an optional powered footrest button [15]. Kimi's sources list both a powered footrest and a powered hinge rail as options (kimi:stannah_accessories_3). Whether the powered footrest is standard in every U.S. Siena quote or only in certain configurations is not established by the checked sources [11].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Stannah Siena folded depth for shared stairways?
  • Do AI platforms agree that Stannah Siena keeps a shared staircase usable when parked?

The clearest agreement is on folded depth for the straight model. Four platforms cite 14.5 inches from the wall when folded [17], and google's sources cite 13.5 inches (344 mm) for the Siena 600 and Siena One [20]. Every platform that discussed the curved model put it at 16 inches folded, which is deeper than the straight version [17].

Platforms also agreed that folding is part of the Siena design and that a powered footrest exists. Stannah's product page says the powered footrest raises and lowers by pressing a button [17], and its U.S. pricing page lists footrest obstruction sensors as standard [23]. Google's sources describe the linked seat-and-footrest mechanics and the optional powered button [24]. Deepseek described folding seat, footrest, and armrests as part of the Siena design but could not confirm a model-specific folded-depth figure (deepseek:s1).

A third area of agreement is that installation fit is determined on site. Stannah requires a home assessment, uses standardized straight rails and custom curved rails, and sells through a survey-and-quote process [26]. No platform claimed the published folded depth equals the guaranteed remaining walkway width.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Do AI platforms disagree about Stannah Siena armrest folding and obstruction sensor performance?
  • Is the Stannah Siena retracting rail motorized, and is it available on straight models?

The platforms disagreed on overall fit rating. Google and grok rated the Siena a strong fit for shared household clearance (google, grok). Openai, anthropic, and perplexity rated it good (openai, anthropic, perplexity). Deepseek and kimi rated it mixed, largely because they could not confirm folded depth, folding-rail availability, or powered-footrest status from the sources they checked (deepseek, kimi).

Armrest behavior is the sharpest unresolved point. Anthropic reported that the Siena armrests do not automatically fold or retract and remain extended when the seat is folded, reducing effective clearance, and estimated that manually lowered armrests could add several inches to the folded footprint (anthropic). Openai found that Stannah highlights longer armrests for easier entry and exit but does not clearly specify independent folding or a quantified folding force [27]. Kimi reported that armrests fold up manually and that company materials call them "easy to fold" without specifying force or one-handed operation (kimi:stannah_siena_overview_2). No checked source quantified armrest folding force or the armrest's contribution to the parked footprint.

Retracting rail details are also uncertain. Openai and grok describe an automatically retracting rail as an optional feature [28]. Anthropic could not confirm whether the retractable rail is motorized, semi-automatic, or manual, or whether it is available on straight models only or also curved (anthropic). Perplexity's checked sources did not clearly verify a Siena folding-rail option for the U.S. market [29]. Kimi lists a powered hinge rail as an option (kimi:stannah_accessories_3).

Obstruction-sensor sensitivity is unquantified across the board. Stannah states that footrest safety sensors detect obstructions and stop the lift immediately [28], and google's sources describe sensors on the side of the carriage and beneath the footrest [31]. No checked source published sensitivity thresholds, adjustment settings, false-stop rates, or independent testing for shared-stair traffic (openai, anthropic, deepseek, perplexity, kimi).

Warranty terms conflict. Stannah's U.S. warranty-registration page states lifetime carriage motor-gearbox coverage and one year of parts and labor, with parts coverage extendable up to five years [33]. Google's source describes a lifetime motor-gearbox warranty plus a two-year parts warranty when registered within 30 days [35]. Grok reported two-year parts and one-year labor (grok:11). Perplexity noted that some general Stannah pages mention a two-year warranty while U.S. warranty pages specify lifetime motor-gearbox plus one year of parts and labor, and that the U.S. page should control for a U.S. purchase [36].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • How does the Stannah Siena folded depth and parked footprint affect walkway clearance on a shared staircase?
  • What safety sensors and controls does the Stannah Siena offer for a household with multiple stair users?

Folded depth is the headline capability. The straight Siena is published at 14.5 inches from the wall when folded, and the curved at 16 inches [38]. Google's sources cite 13.5 inches (344 mm) for the Siena 600 and Siena One [41]. Stannah's separate dimensions page states that straight-stair depth can vary with the rail-start position, so the published figure should not be treated as the guaranteed remaining walkway width [44]. Anthropic reported a minimum staircase width of 27–28 inches, a chair width of 20.5 inches inside the armrests, and a 6-inch rail-to-wall distance [39]. Those figures are platform-reported and were not independently verified.

Folding rail availability is the second lever. Stannah lists automatically retracting rails as an additional-cost option for stairs with doors at the bottom [45], and google's sources describe a retractable rail that extends or retracts as the stairlift moves, plus a straight rail that takes about 6 inches (15 cm) along the staircase edge and protrudes past the bottom step unless a retractable rail is chosen [46].

Automatic footrest support is the third. The Siena product page says the powered footrest raises and lowers by pressing a button [38], and google's sources describe a linked design where lifting the seat raises the footrest, with a powered button as an option [48]. Stannah's U.S. pricing page lists footrest obstruction sensors as standard [45].

Armrest folding ease is the weakest documented criterion. Stannah highlights longer armrests for easier entry and exit, but the checked U.S. materials do not clearly specify independent folding or a quantified folding force [38]. Anthropic reported that armrests do not automatically fold and remain extended when the seat is folded (anthropic). Kimi reported manual folding with no force specification (kimi:stannah_siena_overview_2).

Obstruction sensors are described but not quantified. Stannah states that footrest safety sensors detect obstructions and stop the lift immediately [45], and google's sources describe safety edges that stop immediately on obstructions plus a keyswitch that limits unauthorized use [50]. No checked source published sensitivity thresholds or false-stop rates.

Installation fit runs through a home assessment. Stannah says straight rails are standardized and curved rails are custom-designed, and that a home assessment determines fit [52]. Deepseek's sources describe a home-survey and dealer-installation channel rather than direct online sales (deepseek:s3). Perplexity's sources state that installation and measuring are included in the quoted price and that no structural alterations are required in Stannah's general stairlift materials [53].

Warranty coverage is documented but conflicting. The U.S. warranty-registration page states lifetime carriage motor-gearbox coverage and one year of parts and labor, with parts coverage extendable up to five years [55]. The U.S. sales terms state that labor after the first year for gearbox repair is chargeable and exclude unauthorized modifications, negligence, lack of yearly maintenance, and listed wear components [57]. Google's source describes a two-year parts warranty when registered within 30 days [58].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does a Stannah Siena straight stairlift cost installed, and what do the powered footrest and retracting rail add?
  • What warranty, cancellation, and ongoing maintenance terms apply to a Stannah Siena purchase?

Stannah publicly lists U.S. starting prices of $4,700 for straight stairlifts and $10,800 for curved stairlifts, while stating that quotes are customized [59]. Independent sources give wider installed ranges: $4,700–$8,500 for straight and $8,500–$14,500+ for curved [62]. One independent dealer lists a Siena One straight model around $2,995 [64], and another lists a professional install of the Siena straight at $4,400 including a powered footrest [65]. These are dealer-specific figures, not Stannah-published prices.

Additional fees are configuration-dependent. The automatically retracting rail is an additional-cost option [59]. Anthropic estimated the retractable rail at $800–$1,500 and a powered swivel seat at $500–$1,000, labeling both as unconfirmed (anthropic). Kimi lists a powered footrest and powered hinge rail as options without published prices (kimi:stannah_accessories_3). Openai noted that exact pricing for the powered-footrest Siena configuration and any folding-rail installation is unclear without a quote [59].

Contract and cancellation terms are thin. Stannah advertises a 7-day money-back guarantee on its U.S. warranty page, and the exact eligibility, exclusions, and whether customized installation costs are fully refundable should be confirmed in the sales contract (openai). Warranty coverage may differ when purchased through a distributor rather than directly from Stannah (openai). Google's sources state that stairlift warranties are non-transferable and that extended warranties purchased before installation are refundable for remaining years without completed service or emergency calls (google). Perplexity found no verified cancellation, restocking, or deposit terms in the checked sources (perplexity).

Ongoing costs are not fully transparent. Post-first-year labor and some wear components may remain buyer costs despite lifetime gearbox coverage [66]. Anthropic estimated annual maintenance or service plans at $200–$400 and extended parts warranty at $300–$500 annually or as a lump sum, labeling both unconfirmed (anthropic). Deepseek reported that Siena pricing is not published on Stannah's site and is quoted per job by local dealers after a home survey, so street prices should be treated as unknown until a quote is obtained (deepseek).

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is the Stannah Siena best suited for in a shared household with a straight staircase?
  • Is the Stannah Siena worth it for families who need easier folding rather than manual bending?

The Siena is best suited to households with a straight staircase where a measured 14.5-inch folded depth leaves adequate passage, and where a powered footrest or optional retracting rail addresses frequent household traffic (openai). Openai's assessment lists households with a straight staircase at least approximately 14.5 inches wider than the wall-side clearance requirement, homes needing easier folding through a powered footrest, staircases with a door or high-traffic area at the bottom, and buyers who value manufacturer installation and U.S. service coverage (openai).

Anthropic's assessment adds narrow straight staircases of at least 27–28 inches, homes where the stairlift can remain consistently folded at a bottom landing rather than a high-traffic passage, and families willing to pay for optional powered rail retraction (anthropic). Google's assessment emphasizes staircases where maximum pedestrian walking space is required when the lift is parked, users who want to avoid bending to fold the footrest, and narrow hallways or high-traffic bottom landings where a retractable folding rail is necessary (google). Perplexity's assessment emphasizes households that need a compact folded stairlift on a straight staircase with powered footrest support and buyers comfortable confirming final fit through a home assessment (perplexity).

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose the Stannah Siena for a shared household stairway?
  • Is the Stannah Siena a poor fit for curved, L-shaped, or very narrow shared staircases?

The Siena is probably not the best choice for very narrow or unusually configured stairs where the remaining walk-through width is marginal after installation, or for homes requiring a guaranteed fully unobstructed stairway without a site-specific measurement and parked-footprint drawing (openai). Openai also lists buyers prioritizing a publicly posted all-in price or independently verified comparisons of obstruction-sensor sensitivity as poor fits (openai).

Anthropic's assessment excludes narrow staircases where folded stairlifts block walking passage despite the 14.5-inch depth, households with curved, L-shaped, or multi-landing stairs because the Siena 260 curved model increases depth to 16 inches and reduces capacity, families requiring automatic armrest folding, users needing a completely flat folded profile, staircases below 27 inches, and buyers needing monthly standby or rental options (anthropic). Deepseek's assessment excludes narrow Shared Stairways where every inch of folded depth is critical and a folding rail is needed, buyers who require published model-specific folded-depth and obstruction-sensor specifications before purchase, and self-install or low-cost buyers (deepseek). Kimi's assessment excludes budget-constrained buyers needing upfront pricing transparency, buyers requiring immediate confirmation of folded depth under 13 inches, and households needing clear U.S. warranty and service network details before purchase (kimi).

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to the Stannah Siena when a smaller verified folded footprint is required?
  • When should a buyer choose a different stairlift instead of the Stannah Siena for shared stairway clearance?

Another option may be better when a competing supplier provides a smaller verified folded footprint for a particularly narrow shared stairway, or when a competing product offers documented automatic rail, folding armrests, or parked-position dimensions that better match the household's clearance requirement (openai). Openai also lists buyers who need independently tested obstruction-sensor performance or a clearly documented service-price schedule, and buyers who want a lower initial price and accept potentially narrower warranty or service coverage (openai).

Anthropic's alternatives list includes Bruno, Acorn, or other curved-rail specialists for curved or multi-landing stairs, competitor brands that may offer motorized armrest fold as standard, reconditioned Stannah units or economy straight models for severe budget constraints, compact models from other manufacturers for staircases below 27 inches, rental or lease programs from regional dealers for temporary deployment, and specialized XL stairlift models for users above 350 lbs (anthropic). Deepseek's alternatives list includes any situation where a folding rail is required and cannot be confirmed available on the Siena, where published folded-depth or sensor specs are essential, where the stairway is very narrow and an alternative with documented lower folded depth exists, or where the buyer wants transparent online pricing (deepseek). Kimi's alternatives list includes stair widths under 30 inches where maximum folded compactness is essential, buyers who need budget certainty before a home visit, immediate installation timelines with uncertain local dealer availability, and simpler straight-rail solutions without curved-rail premium pricing (kimi).

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Stannah about the Siena folded footprint before signing a contract?
  • Which Stannah Siena warranty, sensor, and rail details should be put in writing before purchase?

The verification list below consolidates the questions the platforms flagged as unresolved. Buyers should get written answers before committing.

  • What is the measured wall-to-wall and handrail-to-handrail clearance with the Siena fully folded and parked at the proposed location (openai)?
  • Will the proposed rail start position or an extended or retracting rail change the 14.5-inch folded-depth figure [67]?
  • Is the automatic retracting rail feasible for this staircase, and what is its separate installed price [68]?
  • Are both armrests manually foldable, how much force is required, and do they fold with the seat or footrest (openai, anthropic)?
  • What obstruction sensors are installed, where are they located, and how are nuisance stops handled (openai, anthropic)?
  • What exact clearance remains for other household members when the lift is folded, parked, or stopped on the stairs (openai)?
  • Which features are included in the quoted Siena configuration, including powered footrest, remote controls, swivel mechanism, and rail type (openai)?
  • Does the written U.S. warranty provide one year or two years of parts and labor coverage, and what labor charges apply after year one (openai, perplexity)?
  • Are batteries, rollers, sensors, annual maintenance, service visits, and removal or relocation covered or separately charged (openai)?
  • Is the sale direct from Stannah or through a distributor, and which warranty, service response area, cancellation, and refund terms apply (openai, deepseek)?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The consensus is a qualified good fit, not a strong one. Five of seven platforms rated the Siena good or strong for shared household clearance, while two rated it mixed because key clearance facts were unconfirmed in their sources (openai, anthropic, perplexity, google, grok, deepseek, kimi). The strongest reason to consider it is the published 14.5-inch folded depth on the straight model combined with a powered footrest and an optional automatically retracting rail [69]. The main limitation is that the 14.5-inch figure is not a universal installed footprint: rail-start position, armrest behavior, and obstruction-sensor sensitivity are not publicly quantified, and the curved model is deeper at 16 inches [71].

Platform agreement here reflects shared reading of Stannah's own published materials, not independent proof of product quality. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in this evidence set, and no platform reported physical testing of the Siena on a shared stairway. Buyers should treat the Siena as a strong shortlist candidate and confirm the installed parked footprint, remaining walkway, armrest operation, rail configuration, and written U.S. warranty terms for their specific home before purchasing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from seven platform fit-research responses collected for the Shared Household Clearance use case under the broader Shared Household Clearance study. Each platform evaluated Stannah Siena against eight criteria: folded depth, folding rail availability, automatic footrest, armrest folding ease, obstruction sensor sensitivity, parked footprint, installation fit, and warranty coverage. Three of the seven platforms named the Siena during ranking discovery; all seven produced a fit assessment. The study date is 2026-09-27. This review sits within the stairlifts category.

Methodology Limitations

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Anthropic and deepseek reported 2026-01-15, while google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-27. Those dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

All included platforms evaluated fit, but the platform mention count reflects only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in this evidence set, so company claims should not be described as independently verified. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Deepseek ran without search enabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts. Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing; the conflicts are described above and buyers are directed to verify. No platform reported physical testing, customer experience, or independent verification of the Siena on a shared stairway.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

  • Stannah Stairlift Review 2026: Warranty, Cost & Models - Modernize: https://modernize.com/stair-lift/stannah-stairlift-review
  • Stannah Stairlift Review 2026: Warranty, Cost & Models: https://modernize.com/stair-lifts/best-brands/stannah
  • Siena 260 a Stairlift For Curved Stairs - Stannah In The Mountain West: https://stannahinthemountainwest.com/stannah-stairlifts/siena-260/
  • Stannah Siena One Straight Stairlift – Thealbanyliftcompany: https://thealbanyliftcompany.com/products/stannah-siena-one-straight-stairlift
  • Stannah's Siena Stair Lifts - american-mobility: https://www.american-mobility.com/product-page/stannah-sienna-stair-lifts
  • Stannah Stair Lifts Review 2026: Tested - The National Council on Aging (NCOA: https://www.ncoa.org/adviser/stair-lifts/stannah-stair-lifts-review/
  • Additional AI research evidence71 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    6. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    7. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    8. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    9. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    13. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    15. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    19. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    20. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    21. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    22. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    24. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    25. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    29. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    30. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    31. AI research evidence record google:1.3.7
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    35. AI research evidence record google:2.2.6
    36. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    37. AI research evidence record perplexity:c9
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    40. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    41. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    42. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    43. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    47. AI research evidence record google:1.3.5
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    49. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    50. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.3.7
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    53. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    54. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    56. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.2.6
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    61. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    63. AI research evidence record google:2.1.4
    64. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    65. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c2

Verify This Research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
September 27, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
36
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#4

Research trail and source mix

Configured platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

6 independent · 30 company-owned

Evidence support

26 direct · 9 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 ba7a1e80371a2e06139d4574f1003a8312cd66cec23c4c914bc46ab354a9828c