AI Consensus Fit Review

Defiant Deadbolt Review for Seniors

Defiant Deadbolt is a mixed fit for Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
AI Consensus Fit Review research report illustration
Independent AI consensus researchWe compare multiple AI platforms to surface agreement, disagreement, and buyer-specific tradeoffs.

Answer Capsule

Defiant Deadbolt is a mixed fit for Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access. Only 2 of 7 platforms named it during the ranking stage, and those two split sharply: one rated it weak, the other mixed. The strongest reason to consider it is the Defiant Square Compact Wi-Fi model (HSGCXX901ALPB), which supports app control, temporary access, and up to 100 user codes at a listed $79.97 [1]. The main limitation is that the basic Defiant Electronic Deadbolt with Keypad has no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or app, so caregivers cannot manage codes or unlock remotely [2]. Buyers must confirm which model they are actually purchasing.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 platforms (anthropic, kimi)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank5.5
Best listed rank3 (anthropic)
Relevant product/model/planDefiant Square Compact Matte Black Electronic Single Cylinder Deadbolt Wi-Fi Enabled Powered by Hubspace, model HSGCXX901ALPB [3]; non-smart Defiant Electronic Deadbolt with Keypad is the model most other platforms evaluated [4]
Overall use-case fitMixed
Research date2026-09-27

Why Defiant Deadbolt Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Defiant Deadbolt a good choice for Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access?
  • Why did only 2 of 7 AI platforms name Defiant Deadbolt in the ranking stage?

Defiant Deadbolt qualified because it met the study's minimum-mention threshold, not because platforms agreed it was a strong caregiver product. Two of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery: anthropic placed it at rank 3 and kimi at rank 8, producing an average listed rank of 5.5 and a platform share of 28.6%. Five platforms evaluated Defiant's fit without naming it in their ranking lists.

The qualification is also a caution. The two platforms that named Defiant evaluated different products. Anthropic assessed the keypad-only Defiant Electronic Deadbolt with Keypad and rated it a weak fit [6]. Kimi assessed the same keypad-only model and also rated it weak [7]. OpenAI, which did not name Defiant in ranking, evaluated the Wi-Fi Hubspace model HSGCXX901ALPB and rated it mixed [8]. That product-line split is the single most important fact in this review.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Defiant Deadbolt model should a buyer choose for remote caregiver access and temporary codes?
  • Does the Defiant Electronic Deadbolt with Keypad support app-based code management for caregivers?

The Wi-Fi Hubspace model is the only Defiant product materially relevant to caregiver access. The Defiant Square Compact Matte Black Electronic Single Cylinder Deadbolt Wi-Fi Enabled Powered by Hubspace, model HSGCXX901ALPB, is listed at $79.97 and advertised with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, remote control, temporary access, and up to 100 user codes [9]. Home Depot identifies the product category as Hubspace and Wi-Fi enabled for Defiant smart deadbolts [10].

The keypad-only Defiant Electronic Deadbolt with Keypad is a different product and does not serve this use case. It is a standalone lock with no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, app, remote access, or smart-home integration, and all PIN programming happens at the keypad [11]. Grok's evaluation of the recommended keypad model likewise found no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or app (grok:14). Anthropic's assessment of the keypad-only line concluded that caregivers cannot unlock doors remotely, manage temporary codes remotely, or verify access [12].

Buyers should treat "Defiant Deadbolt" as a product family, not a single product. Features documented for one variant should not be applied to another.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree Defiant Deadbolt does well for senior keyless entry?
  • Is the Defiant Deadbolt keypad usable for seniors with vision or dexterity limits?

Agreement was strong on basic hardware strengths and strong on the core caregiver gap. Across the seven platform responses, the recurring points of consensus were:

  • Physical key backup exists. Multiple platforms report a traditional key override on Defiant electronic deadbolts [13]. This is a genuine safety feature for seniors.
  • Backlit keypads are common. Backlit or illuminated keypads are reported across several Defiant models [13].
  • Installation is simple. Platforms describe standard deadbolt replacement with basic tools and no wiring [18].
  • The keypad-only model has no remote management. This is the most consistent finding in the entire dataset. Anthropic, deepseek, grok, kimi, and perplexity all state or imply that the non-connected keypad model cannot be managed remotely [18].
  • Price is low. Reported price points cluster well below mainstream smart locks [19].

Agreement among AI platforms is not evidence of product quality. It reflects overlapping source material, much of it company-owned.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Do all Defiant Deadbolt models lack remote access, or do some support Wi-Fi and app control?
  • Is the Defiant Deadbolt ANSI security grade confirmed for the exact model a caregiver would buy?

Disagreement centered on which product was being evaluated and how capable the smart variant actually is.

Product identity conflict. OpenAI evaluated the Wi-Fi Hubspace model HSGCXX901ALPB and rated fit mixed [21]. Anthropic and kimi evaluated the keypad-only model and rated fit weak [22]. Deepseek, grok, perplexity, and google rated the family mixed [24]. These ratings are not directly comparable because the underlying products differ.

Temporary-code capability conflict. OpenAI reports the HSGCXX901ALPB supports temporary access and up to 100 user codes [21]. Google reports that even Defiant Smart Wi-Fi deadbolts powered by Hubspace lack flexible scheduling and time-based guest access options in the app [26]. These two platform-reported findings conflict and were not resolved by the supplied evidence.

User-code capacity conflict. Reported capacity ranges from 10 codes [28] to 20 codes [22] to 100 codes on the Wi-Fi model [21]. Capacity varies by model and production year.

Security grade uncertainty. Home Depot category data identifies several Defiant electronic deadbolts as ANSI Grade 3, but does not establish that grade for the exact HSGCXX901ALPB model [32]. Perplexity found Grade 3 mentioned only on a different Defiant touchscreen listing [33]. Kimi states the grade is unverified for the model it reviewed [23].

Battery-life uncertainty. Claims range from roughly 8–12 months (grok:1) to up to one year [22] to up to two years on some models [34]. No platform supplied independent battery testing.

Keypad usability conflict. Independent coverage reports an illuminated keypad but also concerns about touchpad feel and loud button feedback on a Defiant smart Wi-Fi deadbolt [36]. Home Depot customer reviews include reports of difficult programming and a small keypad target area on related Defiant keypad models [37].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • How does Defiant Deadbolt handle temporary caregiver codes and remote lock management?
  • What are the keypad readability and battery-life tradeoffs of Defiant Deadbolt for a senior user?

Remote access reliability. The keypad-only model has none [38]. The Wi-Fi HSGCXX901ALPB is advertised for control from anywhere through the Hubspace app, with reliability dependent on home Wi-Fi, internet service, app availability, and cloud service [39]. Anthropic notes the Wi-Fi line uses the Hubspace app but the specified keypad-only product does not support app-based management [41].

Temporary code management. The HSGCXX901ALPB listing states temporary access can be granted to guests, service providers, or family members, with one master code plus 100 user codes programmable through the Hubspace app [39]. Google contradicts this for Hubspace smart models, reporting a lack of flexible scheduling and time-based guest access [42]. Keypad-only models support one temporary one-time code that is automatically deleted after use, plus permanent user codes [44].

Keypad readability. Backlit keypads are widely reported [45]. Independent review coverage of a Defiant smart Wi-Fi deadbolt reported the touchpad lacked tactile guidance and had a loud button beep [47]. Home Depot reviews of related models report a small keypad target area [48]. Kimi states keypad size, button spacing, and tactile feedback for arthritic hands are not documented [38].

Battery life. Four AA batteries are standard, generally not included [44]. Advertised life ranges from 8–12 months to two years depending on model and usage [50].

Emergency key backup. Two physical keys with a rekeyable cylinder are commonly reported [45]. Buyers should verify the exact HSGCXX901ALPB package includes a key cylinder.

Installation ease. Standard deadbolt replacement, Phillips screwdriver only, no wiring, fits 2-1/8 inch holes with 2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inch backsets and doors 1-3/8 to 2 inches thick [44]. The HSGCXX901ALPB is advertised with setup in under 60 seconds through the Hubspace app [39].

App simplicity. Hubspace is the control app for Wi-Fi models and supports setup, remote control, and code management [39]. Google describes app functionality as bare-bones with no Apple HomeKit or IFTTT integration [42]. Independent evidence specific to senior or multi-caregiver accessibility is limited.

Security rating. Grade 3 is reported for several Defiant electronic deadbolts at the category level [54]. Grade 3 is entry-level residential. The exact grade for HSGCXX901ALPB was not established.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Defiant Deadbolt cost for caregiver access, and are there monthly fees?
  • What ongoing costs should a caregiver budget for beyond the Defiant Deadbolt purchase price?

Pricing is low and no recurring subscription was identified, but pricing confidence varies by platform and the exact model matters.

ItemReported costSource
HSGCXX901ALPB Wi-Fi deadbolt$79.97 before tax, delivery, or installation[55]
Wi-Fi Hubspace models (general)$99.88–$119.00[56]
Keypad-only modelsRoughly $29–$50, with examples at $29.88, $42.57, and $44.97[58]
Fingerprint keypad model example$69.97[61]
Basic keypad range$19.88–$56.19(grok:1)

Recurring fees. No recurring Hubspace subscription fee was identified in the sources checked [55]. Buyers should verify whether future cloud, support, or integration fees apply.

Additional costs. Delivery, installation, taxes, and replacement batteries may add to the total [55]. Four AA batteries are generally not included [63]. Professional installation or locksmith fees are possible [66].

Contract and warranty terms. This is a hardware purchase, not a stated term contract [55]. Reported warranty terms include a limited lifetime mechanical warranty and a one-year electronic warranty [67]. Home Depot's return policy is typically 90 days with receipt [67]. Exact warranty, return, and cancellation terms for the specific model and purchase channel were not verified.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is the Defiant Deadbolt Wi-Fi model actually best for in a caregiver setup?
  • Is Defiant Deadbolt worth it for a budget-conscious family managing occasional caregiver visits?

Defiant Deadbolt is best suited to budget-limited buyers whose caregiver needs are modest. The clearest fits from the supplied evidence:

  • Budget-conscious buyers who mainly need local keypad entry and physical-key backup [68].
  • Households where a caregiver can be given a persistent or app-managed code and the buyer accepts a lower-cost smart-lock ecosystem [68].
  • Secondary doors where remote access is useful but premium hardware, accessibility, or mature caregiver workflows are not essential [68].
  • Seniors who prefer tactile buttons and a manual key override without smart-home integration [71].
  • Rentals or doors where Wi-Fi is unavailable and not desired [72].

The Wi-Fi HSGCXX901ALPB is the only variant that plausibly serves remote caregiver access at all, and even that fit is rated mixed.

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Defiant Deadbolt for Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access?
  • Is Defiant Deadbolt unsuitable for care plans that need audit logs and remote code revocation?

Defiant Deadbolt is a poor fit for care plans that depend on remote oversight. The supplied evidence identifies these exclusions:

  • Seniors needing especially large, tactile, or high-contrast controls [73].
  • Care situations requiring dependable audit trails, sophisticated scheduled permissions, or strong multi-caregiver administration [73].
  • Caregivers who need to unlock remotely, revoke codes remotely, or verify entry from off-site [75].
  • Families requiring real-time verification of who entered and when [75].
  • Buyers who want Apple HomeKit, Matter, or IFTTT integration [76].
  • Buyers who want a simple non-smart lock with no Wi-Fi dependency but still expect remote management [73].

The keypad-only model fails on three explicit buyer requirements: remote lock management, temporary access code management, and app-based simplicity [74].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Defiant Deadbolt for a caregiver who needs scheduled access windows?
  • When should a buyer choose a care-platform lock instead of a Defiant Deadbolt?

Another option is likely better whenever remote caregiver coordination is a core requirement. Platforms named specific alternatives under specific conditions:

  • Dependable remote access, clearer caregiver permissions, activity history, and mature support: choose a more established smart-lock platform [77].
  • Local codes and physical-key backup only, no remote management: a non-smart keypad lock may be sufficient [77].
  • Reduced vision, dexterity limitations, or cognitive simplicity: choose a lock with larger tactile buttons or better-documented accessibility design [77].
  • Remote access, temporary code scheduling, and audit trails: consider Yale Assure, Level Lock+, August Home Pro, Schlage Encode, or August Wi-Fi Smart Lock [78].
  • Scheduled temporary caregiver credentials: consider Veise KS01C with one-time codes or QiAccess [80].
  • Integration with home care platforms or emergency services: consider SALTO or QiAccess [82].
  • Audit trails for billing verification or safety monitoring: consider Gatewise or SALTO [82].
  • Cellular-based access without building Wi-Fi: consider Gatewise [80].

These are platform-reported recommendations, not independently tested comparisons.

Questions to Verify Before Buying

The supplied platform responses converge on a verification checklist. Buyers should confirm each item directly with the seller before purchase.

  1. Is the exact model HSGCXX901ALPB, or a non-smart Defiant keypad deadbolt with no remote access [83]?
  2. Can caregivers create, schedule, disable, and remotely revoke individual temporary codes from separate accounts [83]?
  3. Does the system provide access history or notifications, and can multiple caregivers use it without sharing one login [83]?
  4. What happens if home Wi-Fi, internet service, the Hubspace app, or the cloud service is unavailable [83]?
  5. What is the exact ANSI/BHMA security grade for this model [83]?
  6. How many AA batteries are required, are they included, and what battery-life estimate applies under frequent use [83]?
  7. Does the exact package include a physical emergency key, and can the lock be operated mechanically when batteries are depleted [83]?
  8. Are the keypad numbers sufficiently large, illuminated, high contrast, and usable without tactile orientation [83]?
  9. What door thickness, backset, bore size, and strike alignment are required [83]?
  10. What are the exact warranty, return, replacement, and app-support terms [83]?
  11. Does the specific model support temporary access codes that expire automatically [88]?
  12. Does the lock require any subscription, hub, or separate accessory for remote features [88]?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The AI consensus verdict on Defiant Deadbolt for Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access is mixed, with a clear product-line caveat. Two of seven platforms named Defiant in the ranking stage, at an average listed rank of 5.5 and a best rank of 3. Fit ratings split between weak (anthropic, kimi) and mixed (deepseek, google, grok, openai, perplexity).

The keypad-only Defiant Electronic Deadbolt with Keypad is a weak fit. It has no remote access, no app, no temporary code scheduling, and no audit trail, which are core requirements for caregiver coordination [89].

The Wi-Fi Hubspace model HSGCXX901ALPB is a plausible budget option for remote access and temporary codes at a listed $79.97 [91]. Even here, platforms disagree on whether Hubspace supports flexible scheduling [91], and keypad usability, battery duration, exact security grade, and long-term app reliability remain unverified.

Buyers should verify accessibility, code scheduling and revocation, battery performance, exact security grade, emergency-key behavior, and service reliability before relying on any Defiant model for senior-care access.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from seven AI platform fit-research responses collected for the study date 2026-09-27. Each platform independently evaluated Defiant Deadbolt against the Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access use case and supplied its own citations. The ranking stage counted only platforms that named the entity during discovery. Fit ratings, product identifications, pricing, and feature findings were taken from the supplied platform responses without independent testing. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The consensus index for this category is available at Keyless Entry & Caregiver Access, and the broader directory is at home safety.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations materially affect how much weight this review can carry.

  • Platform-reported dates differ from the run date. Anthropic's research date is 2025-01-23 and deepseek's is 2026-01-15, while the authoritative run research date is 2026-09-27. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
  • Platform mentions count only ranking-stage naming. All seven platforms evaluated fit, but only two named Defiant during ranking discovery.
  • Product identity is unresolved. The ranking-stage product description may conflate non-smart Defiant keypad deadbolts with Hubspace smart models, which do not offer the same remote-access capabilities [93].
  • Company-owned citations dominate. The catalog contains 17 owned, 10 independent, and 4 unclear sources. Company claims should not be described as independently verified.
  • Official-site retrieval failed. The Home Depot homepage returned HTTP 403 and was not checked, so no official-page excerpt was available for verification.
  • Conflicts were not resolved. Pricing, user-code capacity, battery life, temporary-code scheduling, and security grade all conflict across platforms. Buyers should verify rather than assume.
  • URLs were not independently validated. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • No independent testing was performed. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification is claimed.
  • Accessibility evidence is thin. Evidence for senior-friendly readability, tactile usability, caregiver scheduling, audit logs, and accessibility is limited [93].
  • Retailer reviews are user-generated. Home Depot ratings and reviews can change over time and may combine reviews across finish or model variants [93].

See the broader Seniors consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

  • Defiant Electronic Deadbolt Single Cylinder Keypad Door Locks User Manual: https://manuals.plus/asin/B018HQLKMU
  • Defiant Electronic Deadbolt Square Keyless Entry Satin Nickel User Manual: https://manuals.plus/asin/B06X1FRRTR
  • Defiant Square Satin Nickel Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Powered By Hubspace: https://www.arbor-home.com/cdn/shopifycloud/storefront/assets/no-image-2048-a2addb12_1024x1024.gif
  • Defiant Electronic Deadbolt Review: https://www.thespruce.com/best-smart-locks-4156656
  • 1641 A $25 Smart Lock?!? Defiant Keypad Deadbolt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGgAlM9928A
  • DEFIANT Electronic Keypad Deadbolt Lock - REVIEW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiJT89PAur0
  • Additional AI research evidence94 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    5. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    14. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    19. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    20. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    26. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    27. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    28. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    31. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    38. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    42. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    43. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    49. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.3.9
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    57. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    61. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    62. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    64. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    65. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    66. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    69. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    70. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    71. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    79. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    80. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    81. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    82. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    84. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    90. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Other Sources

  • Defiant Square Fingerprint Matte Black Electronic Single Cylinder Deadbolt Wi-Fi Enabled Powered by Hubspace: https://www.homedepot.com/p/Defiant-Square-Fingerprint-Matte-Black-Electronic-Single-Cylinder-Deadbolt-Wi-Fi-Enabled-Powered-by-Hubspace-HSGCDX9D01APPB/325366305
  • Additional AI research evidence94 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    5. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    14. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    19. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    20. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    26. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    27. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    28. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    31. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    38. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    42. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    43. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    49. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.3.9
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    57. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    61. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    62. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    64. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    65. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    66. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    69. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    70. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    71. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    79. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    80. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    81. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    82. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    84. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    90. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Verify This Research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
September 27, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
31
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#7

Research trail and source mix

Configured platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

10 independent · 17 company-owned · 4 unclear

Evidence support

23 direct · 8 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 c9ada32ae6a8a7c61438759f058764bc7228a1a40ceb58180ce9ee527b64c110