AI Consensus Fit Review

ADT Health for Bathroom and Shower Emergency Protection - AI Consensus Fit Review

ADT Health is a good fit for Bathroom & Shower Emergency Protection, based on consensus across five of seven AI research platforms that rated it "good" or "strong." Two platforms named ADT Health during the ranking stage (Google and Grok), with an average listed rank of 3.0.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
ADT Health for Bathroom and Shower Emergency Protection hero image
medical-alert-systemsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

ADT Health is a good fit for Bathroom & Shower Emergency Protection, based on consensus across five of seven AI research platforms that rated it "good" or "strong." Two platforms named ADT Health during the ranking stage (Google and Grok), with an average listed rank of 3.0. The strongest reason to consider ADT Health is its explicitly waterproof pendant and wristband options rated IP67 (submersible to 3 feet for 30 minutes), paired with company-operated U.S. monitoring centers and optional fall detection. The main limitation is inconsistent public pricing and specifications: the On-The-Go mobile unit is only water-resistant (not submersible), fall detection is not 100% accurate, and ADT does not offer a caregiver mobile app for real-time location tracking. Buyers should verify current pricing, exact water-resistance ratings, and fall-detection inclusion before purchasing.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 (Google, Grok)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank3.0
Best listed rank3
Relevant product/model/planADT Medical Alert Plus / On-The-Go with waterproof pendant or wristband
Overall use-case fitGood (5 platforms), Mixed (1), Uncertain (1)
Research date2026-08-07

Why ADT Health Qualified for This Study

ADT Health qualified for this study because two of seven AI research platforms (Google and Grok) named it during the ranking discovery stage for waterproof medical alert systems suitable for bathroom and shower use. Both platforms assigned ADT Health a rank of 3, giving it an average listed rank of 3.0. The entity was evaluated against category criteria including water-resistance rating, pendant or wristband comfort, button accessibility when wet, fall-detection availability, response center speed, battery life, and monthly monitoring cost.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Bathroom & Shower Emergency Protection

The most relevant ADT Health products for this use case are the ADT Medical Alert Plus (in-home cellular system) and the ADT On-The-Go (mobile cellular system), both configured with a waterproof pendant or wristband. Optional fall detection is available on both systems. The Medical Alert Plus is the most directly suitable home configuration, while On-The-Go is preferable when portability and cellular coverage matter [1].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Waterproof Wearables Are the Core Strength (Strong Agreement)

Five platforms (OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok, Google, DeepSeek) confirmed that ADT Health's pendants and wristbands are explicitly waterproof and designed for shower and bath use. ADT states that standard pendants and wristbands are 100% waterproof and can be submerged up to 3 feet for up to 30 minutes [5]. The waterproof button carries an IP67 rating, meaning submersion up to 3 feet for 30 minutes is safe [7]. This is stronger than an unqualified "water-resistant" claim and meets the core requirement for shower safety.

Optional Fall Detection Is Available (Strong Agreement)

Four platforms confirmed that automatic fall detection is available as an add-on for Medical Alert Plus and On-The-Go systems. The fall-detection pendant is waterproof and can be worn in the shower [9]. However, ADT explicitly states that fall detection does not detect 100% of falls [11]. One independent review reported that ADT's fall detection proved "remarkably accurate" in hands-on testing, but the company's disclaimer remains in effect [13].

Response Times Are Fast but Company-Reported (Majority Agreement)

ADT states an average response time of 15 seconds for medical alert alarms, based on company data from over 850,000 alarms [14]. Independent testing by The Senior List recorded an average response time of 14 seconds, described as "among the fastest recorded" [15]. ADT also states that home-system base stations have an average response time of 30 seconds or less [16]. Monitoring professionals have an average tenure of 5+ years and over 200 hours of specialized training [17]. These are company-stated or single-reviewer figures, not independently audited performance results.

Month-to-Month Terms and No Termination Fees (Majority Agreement)

ADT medical alert systems are available on a month-to-month basis with no long-term contract required [18]. ADT offers a Price Lock Guarantee, meaning the monthly rate never increases [19]. Systems remain ADT property, and unused days in the billing cycle are reimbursed upon equipment return [7].

Waterproof Wall-Mount Button Is a Bathroom-Specific Advantage (Limited Agreement)

Two platforms highlighted ADT's waterproof wall-mount alert button, which carries an IP67 rating and is described as a "natural fit for bathroom" placement [20]. ADT markets the wall button as ideal for shower or bedside table use [21]. The wall-mount button costs $2.99 per month as an add-on [7].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Water-Resistance Rating Conflicts

There is a direct conflict in reported water-resistance ratings. Google's platform reported an IP57 rating for the On-The-Go system [23], while OpenAI and Anthropic reported IP67 ratings for the waterproof buttons and pendants [24]. IP57 permits brief temporary immersion, while IP67 permits full submersion to 3 feet for 30 minutes. The IP67 rating appears to apply to the wearable buttons, while the On-The-Go mobile unit itself is described as water-resistant and should not be submerged [24]. Buyers should confirm which rating applies to the specific device they receive.

Pricing Conflicts Across Sources

Pricing is inconsistent across ADT's own pages and independent sources. The On-The-Go product page lists $41.99 per month or $119.97 per quarter with a $99 activation fee [26]. ADT's terms cite starting prices of $39.99 per month under certain offers [24]. Independent sources report starting prices of $31.99 per month for basic in-home systems [28]. DeepSeek reported On-The-Go at $34.99 per month and fall detection at approximately $5 per month, figures that conflict with other sources reporting $11 per month for fall detection [30]. Kimi reported a range of $29.99–$52.99 per month depending on plan tier [32]. These discrepancies mean buyers cannot rely on any single published price without verification.

Battery Life Is Not Consistently Documented

The home-system base station has a backup battery lasting 12 to 20 hours, according to ADT support documentation and independent reviews [33]. An independent review reports approximately 40 hours of battery life for the On-The-Go rechargeable device [35]. However, ADT's current product page does not clearly display a comparable On-The-Go battery figure, and wearable device battery life is not specified in official materials [34]. DeepSeek reported a pendant battery life of about 30 months and base station backup of up to 24 hours, figures that conflict with other sources [30].

Wearable Comfort Is Poorly Documented

Independent reviews note that ADT devices are "very noticeable and rather heavy," and the lanyard on some models is not adjustable, requiring a separate order for an adjustable version [36]. No platform found sufficient independent evidence about long-term comfort, fit, skin irritation, or wet-button ergonomics. ADT describes the fall-detection pendant as lightweight, but this is a company claim [38].

Perplexity Could Not Verify Key Claims

Perplexity rated ADT Health as "uncertain" because official-site retrieval failed and the identity details remained unverified. The platform noted that no independent source in its retrieved evidence confirmed the exact ADT Health medical alert plan features, fees, or shower-waterproof specifications [39]. This is a methodology limitation rather than evidence against ADT Health.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Water-Resistance Rating

ADT states that standard pendants and wristbands are waterproof and can be worn in the shower. The waterproof button carries an IP67 rating, meaning submersion up to 3 feet for up to 30 minutes is safe [40]. The On-The-Go mobile device itself is water-resistant and should not be submerged [40]. The waterproof wall-mount button also carries an IP67 rating [42].

Pendant or Wristband Comfort

ADT offers both pendant and wristband options, allowing user preference [43]. The fall-detection pendant is described as lightweight by ADT [44]. Independent reviews note the device is "very noticeable and rather heavy," and the lanyard on some models is not adjustable [45]. No independent testing confirmed long-term comfort or skin irritation data.

Button Accessibility When Wet

The waterproof pendant and wristband provide a physical help button intended for shower use [44]. Google's platform reported that large, tactile physical help buttons are designed for easy pressing even when wet [47]. However, ADT materials do not document button force, tactile differentiation, grip performance, or ease of activation with wet or arthritic hands [44]. No independent testing confirmed wet-button ergonomics.

Fall-Detection Availability

Fall detection is optional on Medical Alert Plus and On-The-Go. Medical Alert Plus uses a waterproof fall-detection pendant; On-The-Go has integrated fall detection in the mobile device [44]. ADT explicitly states that fall detection does not detect 100% of falls [50]. One independent review reported that fall detection proved "remarkably accurate" in testing [51]. Fall detection is not available on Medical Alert Basic [44].

Response Center Speed

ADT states that home-system base stations have an average response time of 30 seconds or less, with 24/7 monitoring by trained personnel [44]. ADT's company data reports an average response time of 15 seconds across over 850,000 alarms [52]. Independent testing by The Senior List recorded an average response time of 14 seconds [53]. Monitoring professionals have an average tenure of 5+ years and over 200 hours of specialized training [54]. These are company-stated or single-reviewer figures, not independently audited performance results.

Battery Life

The home-system base station has up to 20 hours of backup battery according to ADT support documentation [55]. Independent reviews report 12 to 20 hours of base station backup battery [56]. An independent review reports approximately 40 hours for the On-The-Go rechargeable device [57]. Wearable device battery life is not specified in official ADT materials [56].

Bathroom Coverage and Communication

For home systems, the wearable button alerts the base station, and two-way voice communication occurs through the base station rather than through the pendant or wristband [55]. The basic-system support page states the wearable must be within 150 feet of the base station [55]. Independent reviews report that Basic and Plus systems have 300 and 600 feet ranges, respectively, which may not cover larger homes [58]. One review noted that the 300-foot range covered a mid-sized three-bedroom home but signal dropped outside [59].

Portability and Connectivity

On-The-Go uses cellular and GPS technology and can be taken outside the home [44]. ADT warns that cellular service is not available everywhere or at all times [60]. On-The-Go operates on AT&T's cellular connection [61]. ADT does not offer a caregiver mobile app for real-time location tracking [62].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Known Monthly Costs

PlanMonthly CostSource
Medical Alert Basic (landline)$31.99/month[64], [65]
Medical Alert Plus (in-home cellular)$39.99/month[66]
On-The-Go (mobile cellular)$39.99–$41.99/month[67], [68]
Quarterly billing discount (On-The-Go)$113.97/quarter (~$37.99/month)[69]

Activation and Add-On Fees

  • Activation fee: $99–$99.99 one-time [67]
  • Fall detection pendant: $11/month add-on [70]
  • Standard pendant or wristband accessory: $14.99 one-time plus $3/month [71]
  • Waterproof wall-mount button: $2.99/month [71]
  • Taxes, shipping, and possible promotional restrictions may apply [71]

Contract and Cancellation Terms

  • Month-to-month service with no termination fees [71]
  • Systems remain ADT property [71]
  • Price Lock Guarantee: monthly rate never increases [73]
  • Reimbursement of unused days in monthly billing cycle upon equipment return [73]
  • Pricing and promotions are subject to change [71]

Pricing Conflicts to Verify

Current public ADT materials show conflicting prices. The On-The-Go product page lists $41.99 per month, while ADT's terms cite starting prices of $39.99 per month under certain offers [67]. Independent sources report starting prices of $31.99 per month for basic systems [64]. DeepSeek reported On-The-Go at $34.99 per month and fall detection at approximately $5 per month, figures that conflict with other sources [74]. Kimi reported a range of $29.99–$52.99 per month [75]. Buyers should confirm the exact quoted price, promotional duration, and total first charge before committing.

Best Suited For

ADT Health is best suited for seniors who need a monitored help button usable in the shower, particularly with Medical Alert Plus for home use or On-The-Go for indoor and outdoor coverage [76]. Specific best-fit profiles include:

  • Home users who want two-way voice communication through a base station [76]
  • Users needing optional automatic fall detection [76]
  • Users who want a portable system with cellular and GPS capability [76]
  • Seniors with good cellular coverage who want a waterproof wearable pendant or wristband [78]
  • Buyers prioritizing established monitoring center experience and fast response times [79]
  • Users who value month-to-month flexibility and no long-term contracts [81]
  • Homebound or mostly-at-home seniors (Medical Alert Plus requires no landline) [83]

Probably Not Best Suited For

  • Buyers who want the entire mobile unit to be submersible — only the wearable buttons are clearly waterproof; the On-The-Go unit is water-resistant but not intended for submersion [84]
  • Users in locations with unreliable AT&T cellular coverage — On-The-Go depends on cellular network coverage and GPS [85]
  • Buyers prioritizing independently verified response-time or fall-detection performance — ADT's response-time claims are company-stated, and fall detection is not 100% accurate [87]
  • Users who need a very low ongoing cost — ADT starts at approximately $31.99–$39.99 per month, while some competitors start at $27–30 per month [89]
  • Families wanting real-time caregiver mobile app for location tracking — ADT does not offer this feature [91]
  • Users requiring the smallest, lightest wearable form factor — independent reviews note ADT devices are "very noticeable and rather heavy" [93]
  • Users in larger homes — Basic and Plus systems have 300 and 600 feet ranges, which may not cover larger homes or outdoor areas [94]

When Another Option May Be Better

  • When FDA-cleared fall detection with clinical evidence is required — consider LifeStation or Bay Alarm Medical [95]
  • When cost is a priority — consider MobileHelp or Medical Guardian with lower monthly rates [95]
  • When a discreet wristband with official IP68 rating is needed — check Lively Mobile Plus [95]
  • When verified IPX7 submersion rating is mandatory — consider Life Alert, Medical Guardian, or Bay Alarm Medical with published specifications [96]
  • When the smallest wearable form factor is critical — consider LifeStation Mini or tiny pendant options [96]
  • When longest published battery life is critical — some competitors specify 5+ years [96]
  • When the buyer requires a fully waterproof mobile communicator — choose another provider [97]
  • When independently measured response times or published fall-detection testing are essential — choose another provider [97]

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Which exact device and wearable will be supplied: Medical Alert Plus, On-The-Go, standard pendant, wristband, or fall-detection pendant? [98]
  2. Is the quoted price $41.99 per month, $39.99 per month, or another promotional rate, and for how long? [99]
  3. What is the total first charge including activation, prorated monitoring, taxes, and shipping? [99]
  4. Is fall detection included in the selected On-The-Go offer, or is it an additional monthly charge? [99]
  5. What is the actual battery duration of the specific On-The-Go unit, and how long does recharging take? [102]
  6. Will the pendant or wristband remain reliably connected in the bathroom, including behind closed doors and at the maximum distance from the base station? [103]
  7. What cellular network does the device use at the buyer's address, and can ADT confirm coverage? [104]
  8. Can the user speak with the response center from the bathroom, or must they be close enough to hear the home base station? [103]
  9. What is the replacement policy for a lost, damaged, or water-damaged device? [105]
  10. Are there user-specific accessibility options for weak grip, limited dexterity, or difficulty pressing a small button? [98]
  11. What is the exact IP ingress protection rating of the wearable — can it be submerged in bathwater or only spray-resistant? [106]
  12. Does fall detection work reliably in shower/tub falls versus horizontal ground falls? [106]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

ADT Health is a good, but not unequivocally best, fit for Bathroom & Shower Emergency Protection. The consensus across five of seven AI research platforms rated it "good" or "strong," with one platform rating it "mixed" and one rating it "uncertain" due to retrieval limitations. The waterproof pendant and wristband options with IP67 ratings, optional fall detection, stated response performance, and flexible month-to-month terms are meaningful strengths. The main tradeoffs are the non-submersible On-The-Go unit, dependence on base-station range or cellular coverage, imperfect fall detection, inconsistent public pricing, and limited independent evidence on comfort and real-world performance. For seniors who need a reliable waterproof help button for shower use and value a nationally recognized brand with established monitoring infrastructure, ADT Health delivers. For those requiring verified submersion protection, transparent pricing, or caregiver location tracking, alternatives may be preferable.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, and Google) that evaluated ADT Health against category criteria for Bathroom & Shower Emergency Protection. Each platform provided use-case findings, pricing information, strengths, limitations, and a fit rating. The research date for this study is 2026-08-07. Platform-reported research dates differ: DeepSeek reported 2026-04-12, while all other platforms reported 2026-08-07. This discrepancy is disclosed as a methodology limitation.

The entity ranking statistics show that ADT Health was named by 2 of 7 platforms during the ranking discovery stage, with an average listed rank of 3.0 and a best rank of 3. The fit ratings by platform were: Anthropic (good), DeepSeek (good), Google (good), Grok (strong), Kimi (mixed), OpenAI (good), and Perplexity (uncertain).

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-08-07. DeepSeek reported a research date of 2026-04-12, which may reflect older information.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions (Perplexity), and no failed fetch was used as a verified domain key.
  • The identity used exact-name fallback; the matching reported domain was retained for downstream research but remains unverified.
  • AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. The consensus reflects what the platforms found in their retrieved evidence, not independent verification of ADT's claims.
  • Pricing conflicts across sources could not be resolved by guessing; buyers should verify current pricing directly with ADT.
  • No independent source verifies ADT's stated response-time averages or fall-detection accuracy in all conditions.
  • No reliable public source establishes that the wearable button is easy to press with wet, weak, or arthritic hands.
  • Battery life for wearable devices is not specified in official ADT materials.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Health and Medical Alert FAQs - ADT support: https://adt.com/
  • Medical Alert Systems | ADT: https://adt.com/medical-alert
  • ADT Medical Alert Basic System Support: https://help.adt.com/article/Medical-Alert-Basic-System
  • Medical Alert Systems | ADT Health: https://www.adt.com/health
  • ADT Medical Alert Systems FAQs: https://www.adt.com/health/faqs
  • ADT Medical Alert Systems | Health Why ADT: https://www.adt.com/health/why-adt
  • ADT Medical Alert Systems: https://www.adt.com/medical-alert
  • Medical Alert Plus Packages | ADT Health: https://www.adt.com/shop/health/medical-alert-plus.html
  • Additional AI research evidence106 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    5. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    9. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    23. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    28. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    29. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    32. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    39. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    43. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    47. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c27
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    64. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    65. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    74. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    75. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    90. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    95. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    105. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Independent Sources

  • ADT Medical Alert Plus Review: Dependable In-Home Cellular Protection - MedGrade: https://medgrade.com/
  • ADT Medical Alert System Review 2026 | SeniorsList: https://seniorslist.com/medical-alert-systems/adt/
  • ADT On-The-Go Emergency Medical Alert for Seniors, Black Wristband | Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/ADT-Medical-Alert-Mobile-Device/dp/B09JT4CBTY
  • ADT Medical Alert: Pricing, Reviews, and Features: https://www.forbes.com/health/medical-alert-systems/adt-medical-alert/
  • ADT Medical Alert Cost, Packages, Pricing & Monthly Plan | ADT Health: https://www.safehome.org/medical-alert-systems/adt/
  • Best Waterproof Medical Alert Devices, Bracelets & Necklaces of 2026: https://www.safehome.org/medical-alert-systems/best/waterproof/
  • Custom Pricing Software Development: https://www.scnsoft.com/financial-management/pricing
  • ADT Medical Alert Cost & Pricing in 2026 - SeniorLiving.org: https://www.seniorliving.org/
  • ADT Medical Alert Cost & Pricing in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/medical-alert-systems/adt/
  • ADT Medical Alert System Reviews and Ratings in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/medical-alert-systems/adt/reviews/
  • ADT Medical Alert Costs: Our Analysis 2026 - The Senior List: https://www.theseniorlist.com/
  • ADT Medical Alert Systems Review, Our Hands-On Test: https://www.theseniorlist.com/medical-alert-systems/adt/reviews/
  • Additional AI research evidence106 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    5. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    9. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    23. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    28. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    29. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    32. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    39. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    43. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    47. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c27
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    64. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    65. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    71. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    74. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    75. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    90. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    95. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    105. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 7, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
27
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#4

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

16 independent · 11 company-owned

Evidence support

20 direct · 7 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 55e6ceb228caeaca2f17d98b3292f13e0ee50600b2fe87c217b7b3f7a94fe21f