AI Consensus Fit Review

GetSafe for Caregiver App and Family Alerts - AI Consensus Fit Review

GetSafe is a mixed-to-weak fit for the Caregiver App & Family Alerts use case.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
GetSafe for Caregiver App and Family Alerts hero image
medical-alert-systemsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

GetSafe is a mixed-to-weak fit for the Caregiver App & Family Alerts use case. Of the 7 AI platforms that evaluated GetSafe for this category, only 2 named it during the ranking stage (deepseek and openai), with both placing it at rank 6. The strongest reason to consider GetSafe is its professionally monitored, voice-activated in-home emergency response system that works without requiring the senior to wear a pendant. The main limitation is that the caregiver app's real-time push alerts, multi-contact permissions, and privacy controls are not clearly documented or verified across sources, with several platforms reporting that GetSafe lacks a dedicated caregiver app entirely. Families seeking a comprehensive caregiver coordination platform with verified app features should look elsewhere.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 (deepseek, openai)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank6.0
Best listed rank6
Relevant product/model/planGetSafe Home Standard or Select system with optional caregiver app and fall detection
Overall use-case fitMixed-to-weak
Research date2026-08-06

Why GetSafe Qualified for This Study

GetSafe qualified for this study because two AI platforms (deepseek and openai) named it during the ranking stage for the Caregiver App & Family Alerts category. The recommended products included the GetSafe Home with Caregiver App (Standard or Select plan) and the Standard or Select home system with optional automatic fall detection (deepseek, openai). The company's official website describes a caregiver app with real-time alerts and multi-sensor home monitoring [1], which made it relevant for evaluation against the category criteria of caregiver app usability, real-time push alerts, location sharing, emergency escalation, multi-contact permissions, subscription cost, and privacy controls.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Caregiver App & Family Alerts

The most relevant product is the GetSafe Home System (Standard or Select package) with optional add-ons. The Standard plan includes two voice-activated buttons, one standard wall button, and a cellular base console; the Select plan includes three voice-activated buttons and two standard wall buttons [2]. Optional add-ons include a fall detection pendant and a caregiver GPS tracking app [5]. The system uses AT&T 4G LTE and does not require a landline [3].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement: GetSafe provides reliable 24/7 professional emergency monitoring with two-way voice communication. All platforms that provided substantive responses confirmed this. When a help button is activated, an operator speaks with the user through the base unit speakerphone and can call 9-1-1 or dispatch responders or caregivers as appropriate [7]. The monitoring center follows the customer's emergency protocol, including contacting emergency responders or listed contacts [10].

Strong agreement: GetSafe's key differentiator is voice-activated, wall-mounted alerts that eliminate the need for wearables. Users can trigger help by saying "Call 911" twice, and the system includes waterproof wall buttons suitable for bathrooms, kitchens, stairs, and hallways [12]. This is particularly valuable for seniors who refuse to wear pendants or wrist buttons [14].

Majority agreement: The caregiver app's capabilities are poorly documented or limited. Three platforms (anthropic, google, perplexity) rated GetSafe as a weak or uncertain fit, citing the lack of a dedicated caregiver app or insufficient documentation. Google's review noted that GetSafe lacks mobile and web apps for caregiver monitoring [17], and another independent review noted the lack of GPS or caregiver monitoring options in packages [14]. Anthropic reported that the GetSafe Home Security app is tailored toward home security users, not medical alert caregiving [18].

Majority agreement: GetSafe is primarily an in-home system without GPS location sharing. Multiple sources confirmed that GetSafe is designed for in-home use only and does not offer GPS location sharing or geofencing [20]. One source noted that GetSafe no longer sells a mobile system [22], while another listed a mobile GPS-enabled help button as an add-on [23].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Caregiver app existence and functionality. This is the most significant disagreement. Deepseek rated GetSafe as a "good" fit, reporting that the caregiver app provides push notifications for falls, inactivity, and other events, and supports multiple caregivers [24]. Grok also rated it "good," citing a robust caregiver app that keeps multiple caregivers in the loop [26]. However, google rated it "weak," citing independent reviews that GetSafe lacks dedicated mobile or web applications for family caregivers [27]. Anthropic rated it "weak," noting the app is tailored for home security users [29]. Kimi and perplexity rated it "uncertain," unable to verify the app's existence from available sources [31].

Monthly monitoring price. The official GetSafe pricing page lists 24/7 monitoring at $29.95 per month [33]. However, anthropic reported a range of $24.95-$29.95 depending on the package [34], and deepseek reported much higher costs of approximately $75/month for Standard and $99/month for Select plans [25]. The official current price of $29.95 should be treated as most relevant [33].

Mobile GPS availability. One source (SafeWise) states GetSafe no longer sells a mobile system [36], while another (Caring.com) lists a mobile GPS-enabled help button for $30/month [37]. This conflict was not resolved by the official website.

Contract terms. Grok reported month-to-month terms with no cancellation or restocking fees [26], while deepseek reported a 36-month contract requirement with early termination penalties [25]. The official site advertises a 30-day risk-free trial [33].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Caregiver App Usability

The evidence is conflicting. Deepseek reports the app allows caregivers to receive real-time alerts, monitor sensor activity, and check on their loved one via a timeline, with mixed user reviews on sitejabber and trustpilot [38]. Anthropic reports the GetSafe Home Security app is available on Android and iOS but is tailored toward home security users [40]. Google reports no dedicated caregiver app exists [42].

Real-Time Push Alerts

Deepseek reports the app sends push notifications for fall detection, inactivity, and door-left-open alerts [44]. Anthropic reports the system does not provide real-time push alerts to multiple designated family members; caregivers receive information via the monitoring center dispatch [45]. Google reports no standard push alerts for family caregivers [42].

Location Sharing

GetSafe is a home-based system without GPS location sharing or geofencing [44]. A mobile GPS-enabled help button is available as an add-on at $30/month, plus $10/month for fall detection on the button and $5/month for the caregiver GPS tracking app [48]. However, one source states GetSafe no longer sells a mobile system [50].

Emergency Escalation Options

GetSafe provides 24/7 U.S.-based monitoring with two-way voice communication. When an alert is activated, the monitoring center can communicate through the base unit and follow the customer's emergency protocol, including contacting emergency responders or listed contacts [51]. The monitoring center dispatches to responders, caregivers, or both [55].

Multi-Contact Permissions

Deepseek reports the caregiver app allows multiple family members to be added as caregivers with no stated limit [44]. However, anthropic reports that GetSafe documentation does not indicate capability for multiple caregivers to manage separate permission levels, custom contact lists, or escalation sequences from within a caregiver app [56]. The official sources do not specify how many caregivers can access the app or whether roles can be customized [52].

Privacy Controls

Privacy controls are not clearly documented. GetSafe retains health and contact information to facilitate emergency response [57], but detailed privacy controls for caregiver access, location sharing, account removal, and data retention are not described in reviewed sources [58].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Current official pricing (from getsafe.com):

  • 24/7 monitoring: $29.95 per month [59]
  • Starter equipment: $39.50 promotional ($79 regular) [59]
  • Standard equipment: $96.50 promotional ($193 regular) [59]
  • Select equipment: $153.50 promotional ($307 regular) [59]

Optional add-ons (from independent reviews):

  • Fall detection pendant: $30 one-time + $10/month [60]
  • Mobile GPS-enabled help button: $30/month [60]
  • Caregiver GPS tracking app: $5/month [60]
  • Extended warranty: $5/month [60]
  • Smoke detector (monitored): $80 one-time [60]
  • Lockbox: $30 one-time [60]
  • Shipping: $12 [63]

Contract terms:

  • 30-day risk-free trial advertised on official site [59]
  • Main base console must be returned upon cancellation [59]
  • Grok reports month-to-month with no cancellation or restocking fees [63]
  • Deepseek reports a 36-month contract with early termination penalties [64]
  • No prorated refunds for partially used monthly services [60]

Pricing conflicts to verify: The official pricing page lists $29.95/month, while older independent reviews cite $27.95/month [66]. Deepseek reported much higher costs of $75-$99/month, which conflicts with all other sources and should be treated as unreliable [64]. An older Forbes review reported $20/month for Mobile GPS service and $5/month for caregiver app access, but those charges were not verified on the current official pricing page [66].

Best Suited For

  • Seniors who refuse to wear pendants or wrist buttons. GetSafe's voice-activated wall buttons allow users to trigger help by saying "Call 911" twice, eliminating the wearable barrier [67].
  • Families whose primary need is 24/7 professional emergency monitoring in a senior's home. GetSafe provides reliable monitoring with two-way voice communication and immediate 911 dispatch [70].
  • Larger homes requiring multiple fixed alert points. The Standard and Select packages provide multiple voice-activated and wall buttons for bathrooms, kitchens, stairs, and hallways [73].
  • Homes without a landline. The system uses AT&T 4G LTE cellular connectivity [70].
  • Buyers seeking cost predictability. The flat monthly monitoring rate does not increase with added equipment [75].

Probably Not Best Suited For

  • Families requiring clearly documented real-time app push alerts for every alarm or status event. Multiple platforms could not verify this capability [77].
  • Care teams needing robust shared dashboards, continuous activity monitoring, check-ins, geofencing, or care-task coordination. GetSafe is primarily an emergency-response platform, not a family caregiving coordination tool [81].
  • Buyers who need verified granular permissions and privacy controls for multiple family members. These are not clearly documented [83].
  • Users who spend substantial time away from home. GetSafe is designed for in-home use, and the mobile GPS add-on is expensive and its current availability is disputed [86].
  • Buyers needing location-based alerts (geofencing) or continuous GPS tracking. These features are not available [88].

When Another Option May Be Better

  • For a robust caregiver app with activity monitoring and multi-caregiver coordination, consider Aloe Care Health, which is noted as having extensive caregiver features like two-way calling, activity monitoring, temperature and air quality sensors, and a robust caregiver app to keep multiple caregivers in the loop [90].
  • For outdoor/mobile monitoring for seniors who regularly leave home, consider wearable-focused systems like Life Alert or Medical Guardian, or mobile-first platforms [92].
  • For caregiver coordination features like shared calendars, medication tracking, and shared notes, consider Connected Caregiver, Caring Village, or Medisafe with caregiver features [90].
  • For integrated geofencing and location-based alerts, consider GuardIO, Chirp GPS, or dedicated location-sharing family apps [90].
  • For a lower-cost option with no equipment purchases, consider systems with leased or rental equipment models [90].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Does every triggered home alarm generate an immediate push notification to caregivers, or does it only contact the professional monitoring center? [93]
  2. Which events generate caregiver alerts: button presses, voice activation, automatic fall detection, low battery, power loss, missed tests, or loss of cellular connection? [93]
  3. What are the exact current monthly and one-time prices for the Mobile GPS device, GPS service, caregiver app, and automatic fall detection? [95]
  4. How many caregivers or emergency contacts can be added, and can multiple caregivers receive alerts simultaneously? [93]
  5. Can caregivers acknowledge, cancel, or escalate an alert from the app? [93]
  6. Does the app provide live location, periodic location updates, location history, geofencing, or only location when an emergency call is placed? [95]
  7. Is the mobile GPS-enabled help button currently available nationwide, and does it work as a standalone system or must it be paired with an in-home base unit? [96]
  8. What privacy controls govern caregiver access, location sharing, account removal, and data retention? [95]
  9. What are the exact trial, refund, cancellation, equipment-return, and shipping terms? [93]
  10. Is automatic fall detection available with the selected Standard or Select configuration, and what exclusions or false-alarm charges apply? [93]
  11. What is the actual battery life of the wireless wall buttons and pendant? [100]
  12. Are there any cellular coverage gaps in your area on AT&T 4G LTE? [94]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

GetSafe is a mixed-to-weak fit for the Caregiver App & Family Alerts use case. The AI platforms split into three camps: deepseek and grok rated it "good," openai rated it "mixed," and anthropic and google rated it "weak," with kimi and perplexity unable to verify key features. The strongest consensus is that GetSafe excels as a professionally monitored, voice-activated in-home emergency response system—particularly for seniors who refuse to wear pendants. However, the caregiver app's real-time push alerts, multi-contact permissions, location sharing, and privacy controls are not consistently verified across sources, and at least two independent reviews report that GetSafe lacks a dedicated caregiver app entirely [102]. For families whose primary need is a comprehensive caregiver coordination platform with verified app features, GetSafe is probably not the best choice. For families whose primary need is reliable in-home emergency monitoring with optional caregiver visibility, GetSafe is worth considering—but only after verifying the app's current capabilities directly with the company.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from 7 AI platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, and google), each of which evaluated GetSafe against the Caregiver App & Family Alerts category criteria. The platforms' responses were analyzed for consensus, disagreement, and uncertainty across the following factors: caregiver app usability, real-time push alerts, location sharing, emergency escalation options, multi-contact permissions, subscription cost, and privacy controls. Each platform's citations were cataloged and verified against the supplied source list. The authoritative research date for this study is 2026-08-06.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ. Deepseek reported a research date of 2026-03-20, while all other platforms reported 2026-08-06. The authoritative run date is 2026-08-06.
  • Platform mentions vs. evaluations. All 7 platforms evaluated GetSafe's fit, but only 2 (deepseek and openai) named GetSafe during the ranking discovery stage. This means GetSafe's ranking statistics are based on a smaller subset than the fit evaluations.
  • Conflicting product information. The platforms disagreed on whether GetSafe offers a caregiver app, whether a mobile GPS device is currently available, and the monthly monitoring price. These conflicts could not be resolved from the supplied sources.
  • Unverified URLs. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • No independent testing. This review relies on platform-reported findings from cited sources. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed.
  • AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. The consensus described in this review reflects what the AI platforms reported from their sources, not an independent measure of GetSafe's performance.

Explore more medical alert systems guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • GetSafe Medical Alert System: https://www.getsafe.com/
  • Medical Alert System Product Overview: https://www.getsafe.com/medical-alert-systems/
  • Additional AI research evidence103 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    14. AI research evidence record google:c2
    15. AI research evidence record google:c3
    16. AI research evidence record google:c4
    17. AI research evidence record google:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    26. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    27. AI research evidence record google:c1
    28. AI research evidence record google:c2
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    38. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    39. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    42. AI research evidence record google:c1
    43. AI research evidence record google:c2
    44. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    46. AI research evidence record google:c3
    47. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    55. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    63. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    64. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    65. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    68. AI research evidence record google:c2
    69. AI research evidence record google:c3
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    76. AI research evidence record google:c4
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    78. AI research evidence record google:c1
    79. AI research evidence record google:c2
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    87. AI research evidence record google:c3
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    89. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    91. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    97. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    102. AI research evidence record google:c1
    103. AI research evidence record google:c2

Independent Sources

  • GetSafe Medical Alert System Review 2026 | U.S. News: https://realestate.usnews.com/home-services/medical-alert-system/getsafe
  • GetSafe Review (2025) - Everything You Need to Know: https://www.top10.com/medical-alerts/reviews/getsafe
  • GetSafe Medical Alert Review 2026: Tested by Experts: https://www.ncoa.org/product-resources/medical-alert-systems/getsafe-review/
  • GetSafe Reviews on Sitejabber: https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/getsafe.com
  • GetSafe Reviews on Trustpilot: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/getsafe.com
  • Additional AI research evidence103 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    14. AI research evidence record google:c2
    15. AI research evidence record google:c3
    16. AI research evidence record google:c4
    17. AI research evidence record google:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    26. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    27. AI research evidence record google:c1
    28. AI research evidence record google:c2
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    38. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    39. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    42. AI research evidence record google:c1
    43. AI research evidence record google:c2
    44. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    46. AI research evidence record google:c3
    47. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    55. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    63. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    64. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    65. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    68. AI research evidence record google:c2
    69. AI research evidence record google:c3
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    76. AI research evidence record google:c4
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    78. AI research evidence record google:c1
    79. AI research evidence record google:c2
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    87. AI research evidence record google:c3
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    89. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    91. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    97. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    102. AI research evidence record google:c1
    103. AI research evidence record google:c2

Other Sources

  • Multiple web search results for medical alert and caregiver systems: https://myconnectedcaregiver.com/
  • SaaS pricing models and feature-based packaging references: https://www.cobloom.com/blog/saas-pricing-models
  • Additional AI research evidence103 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    14. AI research evidence record google:c2
    15. AI research evidence record google:c3
    16. AI research evidence record google:c4
    17. AI research evidence record google:c1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    26. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    27. AI research evidence record google:c1
    28. AI research evidence record google:c2
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    38. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    39. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    42. AI research evidence record google:c1
    43. AI research evidence record google:c2
    44. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    46. AI research evidence record google:c3
    47. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    55. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    58. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    63. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    64. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    65. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    68. AI research evidence record google:c2
    69. AI research evidence record google:c3
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    76. AI research evidence record google:c4
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    78. AI research evidence record google:c1
    79. AI research evidence record google:c2
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    87. AI research evidence record google:c3
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    89. AI research evidence record grok:c2
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    91. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    97. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    102. AI research evidence record google:c1
    103. AI research evidence record google:c2

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 6, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
18
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#8

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

15 independent · 3 company-owned

Evidence support

13 direct · 5 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 08536e048d3fbcae88611e1a45f40c8d700384f41735e8e5e0e9609f08e4d014