AI Consensus Fit Review

MobileHelp Review for Cellular Home Monitoring

MobileHelp is a good fit for Cellular Home Monitoring, but not an unqualified one.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
MobileHelp Review for Cellular Home Monitoring hero image
medical-alert-systemsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

MobileHelp is a good fit for Cellular Home Monitoring, but not an unqualified one. Six of the seven platforms in this study named MobileHelp during the ranking stage, and all seven rated its fit as good or strong for replacing a landline with an in-home cellular medical alert system. The strongest reason to consider it is the Classic Cellular / Classic Home system: no landline required, AT&T cellular connectivity, a stated 1,400-foot in-home range, 24/7 U.S. monitoring, and optional fall detection [1]. The main limitation is verification risk: published pricing conflicts across sources, backup-battery duration was not confirmed in accessible current material, and cancellation, restocking, and equipment-return terms are only partly transparent [3].

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage6 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai)
Share of included platform responses85.7%
Average listed rank5.33
Best listed rank1 (openai)
Relevant product/model/planClassic Cellular / Classic Home in-home cellular system; MobileHelp Duo (cellular component); optional automatic fall detection
Overall use-case fitGood — strong for apartments, condos, and moderate-size homes with reliable AT&T signal
Research date2026-09-27

What Changed Since August 2026

MobileHelp moved down from No. 3 to No. 5, and platform mentions were unchanged at 6. The September 2026 review adds detail rather than changing the buyer picture. MobileHelp's fit remains good, not unqualified, with no recommended configuration change. Pricing evidence now starts at $29.95 per month, newly reported, replacing the $25 per month no longer repeated from August, which sharpens the earlier pricing conflict. Range figures now include 350 feet for the Duo mobile device, and setup is described as reaching "system ready" in about 60 seconds. The review still emphasizes optional fall detection, AT&T coverage dependence, and unresolved cancellation terms, so the core recommendation and verification cautions carry forward largely intact. Differences between the two editions reflect what each article reports; they do not by themselves prove that the product, service, or price changed.

The August 2026 review preserves the earlier article for reference.

Why MobileHelp Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is MobileHelp a good choice for Cellular Home Monitoring in an apartment or condo without a landline?
  • How many AI platforms named MobileHelp for cellular home monitoring, and how highly did they rank it?

MobileHelp qualified because it was named by six of the seven platforms during ranking discovery and was evaluated for fit by all seven. Its average listed rank was 5.33, with a best rank of 1 from openai and a final rank of 5. Ranks by platform were: openai 1, grok 4, deepseek 5, google 5, kimi 7, and anthropic 10.

The entity cleared the study's minimum-mention threshold of two and matched the category criteria directly: cellular network coverage, setup simplicity, base station signal reliability, backup battery duration, monthly monitoring fee, fall-detection support, and cancellation flexibility. Every platform's fit rating landed at good or strong, with google and grok rating it strong and anthropic, deepseek, kimi, openai, and perplexity rating it good.

Qualification does not equal endorsement. Platform agreement reflects how consistently the same product family surfaced for this use case, not verified product quality. Several platforms flagged the same unresolved issues, which is why this review treats MobileHelp as a fit with conditions rather than a default pick.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Cellular Home Monitoring

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which MobileHelp plan is the right choice for in-home cellular monitoring without a landline?
  • Is the MobileHelp Classic Cellular system enough for a senior who mostly stays home, or is MobileHelp Duo needed?

The relevant offer is the Classic Cellular / Classic Home in-home cellular medical alert system, with optional automatic fall detection. MobileHelp's current official site presents it under the name Classic Home and describes it as an in-home cellular system that does not require a landline, starting at $29.95 per month [5]. Google's research cites the same $29.95 starting price and the 1,400-foot in-home range [6].

The system consists of a cellular base station plus a wearable waterproof help button, with two-way voice handled through the base station speaker and microphone [7]. MobileHelp states the system uses nationwide AT&T cellular coverage [5].

MobileHelp Duo is the second relevant configuration: an in-home cellular base station combined with a mobile device for use outside the home [9]. Platform reporting on Duo's current commercial status is inconsistent. Openai noted that the official user-guide page still lists Duo guides but that current product pages reviewed do not establish that Duo is currently sold or priced [10]. Anthropic reported Duo at $44.95 per month, and kimi estimated $39.95–$44.95 per month from review aggregators (anthropic:aginginplace_classic_specs, kimi:mobilehelp_faq_independent). Treat Duo availability and pricing as unverified until confirmed with MobileHelp.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree MobileHelp does well for cellular home monitoring?
  • Does MobileHelp require a landline, and does it work on a cellular network?

Agreement was strong, though not unanimous on every detail. The clearest consensus points:

  • No landline required. Every platform that discussed the product confirmed the cellular system operates without a landline [11].
  • Simple setup. MobileHelp describes plug-and-play installation; independent hands-on testing characterized setup and use as straightforward [16]. Anthropic's cited user manual describes the base station announcing "system ready" within about 60 seconds (anthropic:user_manual_classic).
  • Stated 1,400-foot in-home range. MobileHelp states up to 1,400 feet, and independent testing also reported 1,400 feet [11].
  • 24/7 U.S.-based monitoring. Platforms consistently reported around-the-clock monitoring through U.S. monitoring centers with two-way voice via the base station [11].
  • Optional fall detection. Available as an add-on, not included by default [11].
  • No long-term contract. MobileHelp advertises month-to-month service with no contract [11].

One caveat the platforms shared: fall detection is explicitly not a guarantee. MobileHelp's own disclaimer states fall detection only works if it is part of the service plan, may not detect every fall, and may sometimes send a false alert [21].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why do sources list different monthly prices for MobileHelp Classic Cellular?
  • Is MobileHelp's backup battery duration verified, and how long does it last during a power outage?

Disagreement clustered around pricing, battery duration, and cancellation terms.

Pricing conflict. The current official product page lists Classic Cellular starting at $29.95 per month [22]. Older or aggregator material lists $24.95 (anthropic:aginginplace_pricing_table), $25.95 [24], and $25.95–$29.95 [26]. Perplexity explicitly flagged that MobileHelp's own homepage and product page showed different starting prices [25]. The current official checkout should be treated as controlling.

Fall-detection price conflict. The current official page lists $10 per month [22], while independent reviews report $11 per month [29].

Battery duration. Anthropic, grok, google, and kimi reported roughly 30 hours of base-station backup [26]. Openai could not verify battery duration because the linked technical document was not retrievable during research [31]. Deepseek and perplexity also reported battery duration as unverified [32]. The 30-hour figure is platform-reported, not independently confirmed.

Cancellation and return terms. MobileHelp advertises no long-term contracts and a 30-day risk-free trial [34]. However, the retrieved terms page describes a three-month minimum service commitment, a $50 restocking fee on returns, a full refund only if equipment is returned within 15 calendar days of delivery, and a $350 charge if the system is not returned within 30 days of termination (official:C2). Perplexity reported the same restocking and equipment-charge structure [35]. This is a material conflict with the "no long-term contract" framing and should be resolved before ordering.

Duo availability. As noted above, current commercial availability of MobileHelp Duo is not established by the reviewed product pages [37].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • Does MobileHelp Classic Cellular cover a multi-room apartment or condo at 1,400 feet?
  • Can a senior speak through the MobileHelp wearable button, or only through the base station?

Cellular network coverage. MobileHelp states the system uses nationwide AT&T cellular coverage [38]. Kimi reported AT&T in most areas with T-Mobile in some, and noted the user cannot choose the carrier (kimi:mobilehelp_faq_independent). No platform supplied address-level indoor signal data, so coverage at a specific apartment or condo must be tested on site.

Setup simplicity. Plug-in base station, no professional installation, no landline [40]. Anthropic's cited manual describes the system reaching "system ready" within about 60 seconds (anthropic:user_manual_classic).

Base station signal reliability and range. MobileHelp states up to 1,400 feet [38]. Perplexity cited MobileHelp's fall-button page stating the fall button works approximately 600 feet from the cellular base station [41]. Anthropic's cited Duo manual reported 350 feet from the mobile device or 600 feet from the base station depending on home construction (anthropic:duo_user_manual). These figures conflict with the 1,400-foot headline claim and suggest range varies substantially by device and building materials. Treat 1,400 feet as a maximum specification, not a guaranteed through-wall range.

Backup battery duration. Reported at roughly 30 hours by four platforms [42]. Unverified by openai, deepseek, and perplexity [44].

Fall-detection support. Optional add-on pendant; current official price $10 per month, independent reports $11 [38]. MobileHelp's disclaimer states it may not detect every fall and may send false alerts (official:C2).

Two-way voice limitation. Google flagged that two-way voice is only available through the base station speaker and microphone; the wearable pendant and wristband do not have built-in speakers or microphones [43]. A senior in a distant room may not be able to hear or be heard by the monitoring center.

Waterproofing. Help buttons are waterproof for shower use; the base station is not (anthropic:mobilehelp_classic_product, anthropic:user_manual_classic).

Caregiver notifications. Google reported a free caregiver app plus optional OnGuard Alerts at $2.99 per month for automated emergency text notifications [46].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does MobileHelp Classic Cellular cost per month, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
  • What is MobileHelp's cancellation policy, and is there a restocking or equipment-return fee?

Current official pricing starts at $29.95 per month for Classic Cellular / Classic Home [47]. Optional automatic fall detection is listed at $10 per month on the current official page [47]. The current official page advertises free activation and free shipping, and a free lockbox with an annual plan [47].

Conflicting figures from other sources:

ItemCurrent officialIndependent/aggregator
Classic monthly$29.95 [47]$24.95 (anthropic:aginginplace_pricing_table); $25.95 [49]
Fall detection$10/month [47]$11/month [51]
Processing feeNot listed on current product page$49.95 on monthly plans, waived on longer cycles (anthropic:aginginplace_classic_specs)
Additional buttonsNot listed$2–$2.95/month each (anthropic:aginginplace_classic_specs)
Protection planNot listed$6.99/month [52]
OnGuard AlertsNot listed$2.99/month [52]

Contract and cancellation. MobileHelp advertises no long-term contracts and a 30-day risk-free trial [53]. The retrieved terms page, however, describes a three-month minimum service commitment, a $50 restocking fee on returns, a full refund only if equipment is returned within 15 calendar days of delivery, and a $350 charge if the system is not returned within 30 days of termination (official:C2). Perplexity reported the same structure [54]. Kimi reported buyer complaints about billing and cancellation disputes (kimi:consumer_affairs_complaints, kimi:bbb_profile).

Equipment ownership. Independent reporting states equipment may be provided at no cost while subscribing and may need to be returned after cancellation to avoid charges [56]. Grok described the equipment as leased rather than owned [57].

Pricing confidence across platforms was mixed: google rated it high, openai, anthropic, grok, and kimi rated it moderate, and deepseek and perplexity rated it low [58].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is MobileHelp Classic Cellular best suited for in a no-landline household?
  • Is MobileHelp a good fit for a senior who wants optional fall detection at home?

MobileHelp is best suited for a single senior or caregiver household that:

  • Lives in an apartment, condo, or moderate-size home with reliable AT&T signal at the installation address [61].
  • Is removing a landline and wants an in-home cellular base station rather than a smartphone-only solution [62].
  • Prioritizes simple plug-and-play setup and a long stated base-station-to-button range [64].
  • Wants optional automatic fall detection as an add-on while primarily remaining at home [61].
  • Values month-to-month billing and no advertised long-term contract [66].
  • Wants 24/7 U.S.-based monitoring with two-way voice through a base station [68].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose MobileHelp for cellular home monitoring?
  • Is MobileHelp suitable for a large multi-story home or a household with weak AT&T coverage?

MobileHelp is probably not the best fit for:

  • Homes with weak or unreliable AT&T coverage, since the carrier is not user-selectable [69].
  • Buyers who need verified multi-day power-outage operation or a clearly published battery-backup specification [70].
  • People who regularly need protection outside the home; a dedicated mobile GPS system may be more appropriate [69].
  • Large homes, estates, or multi-story buildings where 1,400 feet is insufficient (anthropic:forbes_classic_review, anthropic:aginginplace_classic_specs).
  • Seniors who need two-way voice through the wearable button itself, since voice is only through the base station [73].
  • Couples or roommates seeking a clearly documented two-user bundle, because current public product information does not establish that MobileHelp Duo remains available [74].
  • Buyers who require fully explicit cancellation, equipment-return, and refund terms before ordering [75].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to MobileHelp for a buyer who needs the lowest monthly cellular monitoring cost?
  • When should a buyer choose a mobile GPS system instead of MobileHelp Classic Cellular?

Consider another option when:

  • Lowest monthly cost is the priority. Kimi compared MobileHelp's roughly $29.95–$34.95 monthly medical-alert pricing against bare cellular alarm monitoring from security-focused providers, citing SafeHomeCentral M2M cellular at $14.95 per month and The Monitoring Center Cellular Enhanced at $21.99 per month (kimi:safehomecentral_pricing, kimi:monitoring_center_pricing). Those alternatives lack medical-alert-specific features such as pendant buttons and fall detection.
  • The senior needs coverage outside the home. MobileHelp's own FAQ positions the Elite on-the-go device as the option for coverage both in and out of the home, and grok recommended Elite or a competitor with stronger mobile options for active seniors [76].
  • The home has weak AT&T signal. A system operating on a different network may be preferable [77].
  • Maximum cancellation flexibility is required. No-contract security monitoring providers advertise cancel-anytime terms without restocking or equipment-return exposure (kimi:safehomecentral_pricing, kimi:monitoring_center_pricing).
  • Independently verified battery-life specifications are required before purchase. No platform supplied a verified battery figure [79].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  • What AT&T signal strength is available at the exact installation address, and can the system be returned if indoor signal is inadequate? [81]
  • What is the tested backup-battery duration of the specific Classic base-station model being shipped? [82]
  • Does the advertised 1,400-foot range apply through multiple floors and typical apartment or condo walls, or only in open conditions? [81]
  • What is the exact current monthly, quarterly, and annual price, including taxes, fall detection, lockbox, premium services, and shipping? [81]
  • Is automatic fall detection compatible with the exact Classic hardware being supplied, and is it $10 or $11 per month? [81]
  • What is the cancellation process, notice period, refund policy, return deadline, and responsibility for return shipping? [85]
  • Are there equipment charges if the base station, pendant, or fall-detection device is not returned? [86]
  • Does the system continue to function for emergency calls during a local cellular outage or extended power outage? [82]
  • Is MobileHelp Duo currently available, and if so, what are its current price, second-user terms, and cellular features? [88]
  • Can the buyer perform a complete test from the bedroom, bathroom, balcony, basement, and other locations where help may be needed? [81]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

MobileHelp is a good, but not unqualified, fit for cellular home monitoring. Six of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, and all seven rated its fit as good or strong. The Classic Cellular / Classic Home system matches the core need well: no landline, straightforward installation, AT&T cellular connectivity, a stated 1,400-foot in-home range, 24/7 monitoring, and optional fall detection [91].

It is strongest for a single senior living in an apartment, condo, or moderate-size home with dependable AT&T service. The purchase risks are consistent across platforms: conflicting published prices, unverified battery-backup duration, a range specification that conflicts with device-level figures, and cancellation terms that include a three-month minimum, a $50 restocking fee, and a $350 non-return charge despite "no long-term contract" marketing [93].

Verify the exact current price, fall-detection fee, battery-backup duration, indoor signal, and cancellation and equipment-return terms before purchase. Buyers who need verified battery specifications, outdoor coverage, or fully transparent cancellation terms should compare alternatives before committing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review evaluates MobileHelp only for the Cellular Home Monitoring use case. It is not a broad company review. The study used seven AI platforms: anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity. Six of the seven named MobileHelp during the ranking stage; all seven evaluated fit.

Platform fit ratings were: google and grok strong; anthropic, deepseek, kimi, openai, and perplexity good. The ranking stage counted only platforms that named the entity during discovery, while fit evaluation covered all included platforms.

All factual claims are cited to supplied platform evidence using parenthetical citation IDs. Company-owned sources are labeled as owned; independent reviews and directories are labeled as independent. Platform-reported claims without retrieved evidence are labeled as platform-reported or unverified. No personal testing, customer experience, medical benefit, or guaranteed performance is claimed.

Methodology Limitations

  • The authoritative run research date is 2026-09-27. Platform-reported research dates differ: anthropic and deepseek reported 2026-01-15, while google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-27. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
  • All included platforms evaluated fit, but platform_mentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.
  • Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing; conflicts are described and buyers are directed to verify.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.
  • One platform (deepseek) ran with search disabled, so its claims are platform-reported rather than retrieved.
  • Official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions and that a product-labeled company mention was merged using matching company-name and supplied-domain signatures.
  • Backup-battery duration could not be verified from accessible current material; the 30-hour figure is platform-reported.
  • MobileHelp Duo's current commercial availability is not established by the reviewed product pages.

Explore more medical alert systems guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Medical Alert Call Systems by MobileHelp: https://offers.mobilehelp.com/medical-alert-call-systems/
  • MobileHelp Official Website – Cellular Medical Alert Systems: https://www.mobilehelp.com/
  • MobileHelp Duo System Details: https://www.mobilehelp.com/duo
  • MobileHelp Pricing and Plans: https://www.mobilehelp.com/pricing
  • Classic Cellular Medical Alert System | No Landline - MobileHelp: https://www.mobilehelp.com/products/classic-cellular
  • Classic Cellular Medical Alert System | No Landline | MobileHelp: https://www.mobilehelp.com/products/in-home-medical-alert-system
  • MobileHelp Classic and Duo Product Information: https://www.mobilehelp.com/shop
  • Official pricing and terms source: https://www.mobilehelp.com/pages/terms-of-use
  • Additional AI research evidence94 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    7. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    8. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    9. AI research evidence record deepseek:c4
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    15. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    17. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    19. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    21. AI research evidence record google:1.2.7
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    23. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    24. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    26. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    28. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    29. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    30. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    32. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    36. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    39. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    40. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    42. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    43. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    49. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    50. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    52. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    54. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    55. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    57. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    59. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    63. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    65. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    67. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    71. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    72. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    73. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    76. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    78. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    83. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    84. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    85. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    87. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    89. AI research evidence record deepseek:c4
    90. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    94. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence94 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    7. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    8. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    9. AI research evidence record deepseek:c4
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    15. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    17. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    19. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    21. AI research evidence record google:1.2.7
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    23. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    24. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    26. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    28. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    29. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    30. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    32. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    36. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    39. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    40. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    42. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    43. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    49. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    50. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    52. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    54. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    55. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    57. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    59. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    63. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    65. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    67. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    71. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    72. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    73. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    76. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    78. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    83. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    84. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    85. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    87. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    89. AI research evidence record deepseek:c4
    90. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    94. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5

Verify This Research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
September 27, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
34
Ranking mentions
6 of 7
Platform share
86%
Final consensus rank
#5

Research trail and source mix

Configured platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

19 independent · 13 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

22 direct · 12 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 b1134e08ced350f2f359d4e95d462e7e305b9013f257b6ce7aea01b54b50d4af

Archived editions

Browse earlier published research snapshots for this article. The latest edition remains at the current URL.