AI Consensus Fit Review

MobileHelp Classic / MobileHelp Solo ecosystem for Rural Seniors - AI Consensus Fit Review

The MobileHelp Classic / MobileHelp Solo ecosystem is a mixed fit for rural seniors and low-signal reliability.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
MobileHelp Classic / MobileHelp Solo ecosystem for Rural Seniors hero image
medical-alert-systemsPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

The MobileHelp Classic / MobileHelp Solo ecosystem is a mixed fit for rural seniors and low-signal reliability. Two of seven AI platforms named it in the ranking stage, giving it a 28.6% platform share with an average listed rank of 2.0 and a best rank of 1. The strongest reason to consider it is the Classic Landline option, which provides a non-cellular connection path for rural homes with dependable traditional telephone service, plus an advertised 1,400-foot range on the Classic Cellular model. The main limitation is single-carrier dependency: all cellular models operate exclusively on AT&T's 4G LTE network with no multi-carrier roaming, satellite backup, or landline fallback on cellular plans. Independent evidence does not verify rural GPS accuracy, dispatch response times, or speaker audibility, and official pricing and contract terms contain material conflicts.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 (anthropic, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank2.0
Best listed rank1 (perplexity)
Relevant product/model/planMobileHelp Classic Landline, Classic Cellular, MobileHelp Solo
Overall use-case fitMixed (4 of 7 platforms rated mixed; 2 good; 1 uncertain)
Research date2026-08-10

Why MobileHelp Classic / MobileHelp Solo ecosystem Qualified for This Study

MobileHelp qualified for this Rural & Low-Signal Reliability review because its product ecosystem spans both connectivity types that matter most in rural settings: a traditional landline base station and AT&T cellular-based systems. The Classic Landline (also called Wired Home) connects directly to a physical phone line, which can function in cellular dead zones where wireless networks fail [1]. The Classic Cellular and Solo models provide wireless alternatives with advertised ranges and GPS capabilities [3]. This dual-path approach made the ecosystem relevant to the category criteria covering cellular carrier coverage, landline fallback options, GPS reliability, device range, backup battery life, and monitoring center responsiveness.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Strong agreement: All cellular models depend exclusively on AT&T's network. Six of seven platforms that provided fit assessments identified AT&T as the sole cellular carrier for Classic Cellular and Solo. The platforms consistently described this as a single point of failure: if AT&T signal is weak or absent at the property, the device cannot reach the monitoring center [5]. No platform found evidence of multi-carrier roaming or satellite fallback.

Strong agreement: The landline option is the strongest rural configuration. Five platforms (openai, deepseek, grok, google, kimi) identified Classic Landline as the most reliable MobileHelp option for rural homes with a working traditional landline. The landline system bypasses cellular dependency entirely and is recommended for areas with poor cell reception [8]. However, platforms also noted its shorter advertised range of 600 feet versus 1,400 feet for Classic Cellular [13].

Majority agreement: Backup battery is approximately 30 hours on base stations. Four platforms cited a 30-hour backup battery for Classic base stations, covering extended rural power outages [15]. Solo battery estimates varied from 36 to 48 hours depending on source [18].

Majority agreement: Monitoring connects users to an operator in as little as 10 seconds. Three platforms cited MobileHelp's claim of operator connection in as little as 10 seconds, with U.S.-based monitoring centers [20]. Platforms also agreed that final emergency response time depends on local authorities and is not controlled by MobileHelp [23].

Majority agreement: Fall detection is optional and costs extra. Five platforms noted fall detection as a paid add-on, with pricing ranging from $8 to $11 per month depending on source and bundle [5]. Platforms agreed the landline model does not support fall detection [14].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Product lineup availability conflict. Sources conflict on whether MobileHelp Solo remains a currently sold product. One June 2026 source states MobileHelp no longer offers Solo, Mobile Duo, or Home Duo, while other 2026 sources and the official website list Solo as current [26]. Buyers must verify current availability directly with MobileHelp.

Landline availability conflict. OpenAI and DeepSeek state the Classic can be set up with either landline or cellular connection [28]. Anthropic states MobileHelp no longer offers a landline version and that Classic Cellular has no landline fallback [30]. Google and Grok confirm the Classic Landline (Wired Home) exists [31]. This is a material conflict that must be resolved before purchase.

Pricing conflicts. The official offers page lists Classic Cellular and Classic Landline at $25.95 per month, while another official page displays Classic from $24.95 per month [33]. Independent sources cite $24.95, $25.95, and $29.95 for Classic plans depending on billing cycle [35]. Solo pricing ranges from $29.95 to $37.95 per month across sources [37]. Fall detection pricing varies from $8 to $11 per month [38].

Contract terms conflict. The homepage states month-to-month service cancellable at any time, while the terms page states a three-month minimum commitment [41]. This conflict should be confirmed at checkout.

GPS accuracy unverified. No platform found independent testing of MobileHelp GPS accuracy in rural, wooded, or mountainous terrain. Solo includes GPS technology, but precision in low-signal rural environments remains unverified [43].

AT&T versus Verizon rural coverage. Multiple independent sources rank Verizon higher than AT&T for rural reliability, with AT&T strongest in suburban and dense urban markets [44]. However, coverage varies significantly by specific location, and platforms advised checking coverage maps for the exact address rather than generalizing [45].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Cellular carrier coverage. Classic Cellular and Solo operate on AT&T's 4G LTE network [47]. MobileHelp describes coverage as nationwide, but this does not guarantee usable signal at a particular rural address, inside a specific home, or across a large property [47]. Dead zones with no tower within 20 to 30 miles still exist in the Mountain West, rural Alaska, and parts of the Great Plains [49]. Mountains, dense forests, and valleys significantly degrade signal even inside coverage maps [49].

Landline fallback options. Classic Landline provides a wired base station for homes without reliable cellular service [50]. It requires a working landline jack and may be incompatible with DSL, VoIP, or other broadband telephone service unless tested [52]. The landline model has a 600-foot advertised range and does not support fall detection [53].

GPS reliability. Solo includes GPS technology for location tracking, with integrated GPS allowing responders to find the user's coordinates [55]. GPS accuracy in rural mountainous terrain, under heavy tree cover, or inside buildings is not independently verified [57]. The Elite model adds Wi-Fi-assisted location for improved indoor accuracy [56].

Device range. Classic Cellular advertises up to 1,400 feet between the wearable button and base unit, described as industry-best [48]. Classic Landline advertises up to 600 feet [50]. One independent test measured approximately 200 feet in a two-story office environment, showing real-world range can be significantly lower than advertised [59]. Actual range depends on building construction, terrain, and installation [47].

Backup battery life. Classic base stations provide approximately 30 hours of backup battery during power outages [60]. Solo battery life is cited at 36 hours in one source and up to 48 hours in another [62]. The Elite model battery lasts up to six days on full charge [64]. Wearable help button batteries last approximately five years [61].

Speaker and two-way communication. The system supports two-way communication through the base station with amplified voice [66]. MobileHelp states operators can call the mobile device if the user is too far from the base station to be heard [60]. Specific speaker-volume ratings in decibels or independent audibility tests were not found [60].

Dispatch protocol. MobileHelp states operators can connect in as little as 10 seconds and will contact emergency response if the user cannot speak [67]. The monitoring center keeps lockbox combinations on file and relays them to responders [70]. Final emergency response time depends on local authorities and cannot be guaranteed by MobileHelp [71]. Terms allow operator discretion in contacting responders [67].

Monitoring center resilience. MobileHelp identifies Affiliated Monitoring as its monitoring partner with geographically diverse centers in New Jersey and Texas [67]. Independent uptime, rural call-completion, and response-time data were not found [67].

Fall detection. Automatic fall detection is available as an add-on using machine-learning models trained on real fall data [72]. In independent testing, MobileHelp detected all three simulated test falls, outperforming some competitors [73]. However, one source found MobileHelp fall detection less accurate than Medical Guardian's [74]. The company states fall detection may not detect every fall and may send false alerts [75]. Fall detection is not available on the landline model [53].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Known monthly costs. Classic Cellular and Classic Landline are listed at $25.95 per month on current product pages, though another official page displays Classic from $24.95 per month [76]. Independent sources cite $24.95 per month for Wired Home and $24.95 to $29.95 for Classic Cellular depending on billing cycle [78]. Solo is estimated at $29.95 to $37.95 per month [80].

Add-on costs. Automatic fall detection is advertised at $10 per month on the Classic Cellular page, though independent sources cite $8 to $11 per month depending on bundle [76]. Wall-mounted buttons cost approximately $2.95 per month each; extra wrist or neck buttons cost approximately $2.00 per month each [78]. A Connect Premium protection plan covering damage and theft costs approximately $6 per month [80]. Lockbox service costs approximately $2.99 per month or is free with annual plans [80].

Fees. A $49.95 processing fee applies to monthly payment plans and is waived for quarterly, semi-annual, or annual plans [78]. Terms state returned equipment may incur a restocking fee of up to $50, and equipment not returned within 30 days after termination may result in a $350 equipment charge [84]. Customer-paid return shipping may apply [85].

Contract terms. The homepage states month-to-month service cancellable at any time, while the terms page states a three-month minimum commitment [86]. Cancellation generally requires contacting customer service; deleting an application does not cancel service [84]. For rented equipment, service cancellation is effective when the equipment is received [85]. Prepaid accounts receive prorated refunds for unused months upon successful device return [78]. Equipment is leased, not purchased [80].

Pricing confidence. Moderate to high across platforms, but conflicts exist between official pages and independent sources. Buyers should obtain a written quote before committing.

Best Suited For

  • Rural homes with dependable traditional landline service and mostly in-home use [87]
  • Users whose property has tested AT&T cellular coverage [89]
  • Seniors with large rural properties needing the 1,400-foot advertised range of Classic Cellular [91]
  • Budget-conscious rural seniors prioritizing low monthly cost starting at $25.95 [89]
  • Active rural seniors with reliable AT&T coverage wanting GPS-enabled mobile protection via Solo [93]
  • Buyers wanting optional fall detection and U.S.-based 24/7 monitoring without a stated long-term contract [89]

Probably Not Best Suited For

  • Properties with unreliable AT&T coverage and no working traditional landline [96]
  • Remote areas where Verizon is significantly stronger than AT&T, such as parts of Wyoming, Nevada, Arizona, and rural Nebraska [98]
  • Deep-rural seniors in documented dead zones with no tower within 20 to 30 miles [100]
  • Large farms or properties requiring dependable coverage beyond the advertised in-home range [96]
  • Buyers requiring independently verified rural dispatch-response or GPS-accuracy data [101]
  • Seniors who need both landline reliability and automatic fall detection, as landline plans do not support this feature [103]
  • Users needing multi-carrier redundancy or satellite fallback for mission-critical safety [98]

When Another Option May Be Better

  • Verizon-dominant rural areas: Choose a Verizon-based medical alert provider when confirmed Verizon coverage is superior to AT&T at the property [104].
  • Landline-first with fall detection: Consider LogicMark Freedom Alert or comparable landline-first options when the buyer needs a landline system with automatic fall detection, which MobileHelp's landline model does not support [107].
  • Higher-accuracy fall detection: Medical Guardian reported superior fall detection accuracy in independent testing [109].
  • Multi-carrier or satellite redundancy: Explore providers with satellite partnerships or multi-carrier connectivity when the buyer needs redundancy in dead zones [104].
  • Extreme remote wilderness: Consider a satellite emergency beacon such as Garmin inReach when the user needs connectivity beyond cellular infrastructure entirely [111].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Which AT&T network technology and coverage map apply to the exact rural address, and can MobileHelp provide or authorize a live in-home signal test? [112]
  2. Is the buyer receiving Classic Cellular, Classic Landline, Solo, or another current model, and what are the exact hardware and battery specifications? [114]
  3. Does the landline model work with the home's specific provider, wiring, DSL, VoIP, backup power, and alarm-line setup? [116]
  4. What is the current minimum service commitment, cancellation effective date, restocking fee, return deadline, equipment charge, and return-shipping responsibility? [116]
  5. What are the current monthly, prepaid, fall-detection, activation, shipping, replacement, and accessory charges after promotional pricing ends? [112]
  6. How does dispatch work if the user cannot speak, the base station cannot hear the user, or the cellular connection drops? [119]
  7. What GPS accuracy should be expected at this property, particularly under trees, near hills, or inside buildings? [121]
  8. What is the actual base-station speaker volume, and can the buyer conduct a room-by-room audibility test during the trial or return period? [123]
  9. What monitoring-center callback number and escalation protocol will be used, and how are local emergency contacts and rural address details provided to responders? [119]
  10. Is the $49.95 processing fee refundable if the system does not get a signal and must be returned? [124]
  11. Will the 600-foot range of the landline system sufficiently reach the outer property line or mailbox? [125]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The AI platforms reached a mixed consensus: MobileHelp Classic / MobileHelp Solo is conditionally suitable for Rural & Low-Signal Reliability, but only after verifying the specific connectivity path at the exact property. The Classic Landline is the strongest MobileHelp configuration for rural homes with a dependable traditional landline, offering complete independence from cellular networks [126]. The Classic Cellular's advertised 1,400-foot range is a genuine advantage for large properties where AT&T signal is confirmed [128]. However, the ecosystem's single-carrier dependency on AT&T, lack of multi-carrier or satellite redundancy, unverified rural GPS performance, and conflicting official pricing and contract terms create material risk for buyers in low-signal areas [129]. Buyers with severe coverage constraints should compare systems using the strongest local carrier or documented multi-carrier support before committing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced on 2026-08-10 by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Grok, Perplexity, Google, and Kimi. Each platform evaluated the MobileHelp Classic / MobileHelp Solo ecosystem against the Rural & Low-Signal Reliability use case using category criteria covering cellular carrier coverage, landline fallback options, GPS reliability, speaker volume, dispatch protocol, backup battery life, device range, and monitoring center responsiveness. Platform responses were compiled with their supplied citations, and factual claims were attributed to the original sources. Two of seven platforms named MobileHelp in the ranking stage; all seven provided fit assessments. The consensus index for Rural & Low-Signal Reliability provides the full category comparison. For broader context, see the medical alert systems directory.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform research date discrepancy: DeepSeek's research date is 2026-02-15, while the authoritative run date and all other platform dates are 2026-08-10. DeepSeek's pricing and product information may be less current.
  • Unvalidated URLs: Supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Product availability conflict unresolved: Sources conflict on whether Solo remains a currently sold product; this review does not resolve the conflict and advises direct verification.
  • Landline availability conflict unresolved: Sources conflict on whether MobileHelp currently offers a landline version; both positions are reported.
  • Pricing conflicts unresolved: Official pages conflict on Classic pricing ($24.95 vs. $25.95), and independent sources vary; buyers must confirm at checkout.
  • No independent verification: Company claims about AT&T coverage, 10-second operator connection, and 30-hour battery life are not independently verified performance guarantees.
  • Limited ranking-stage mentions: Only 2 of 7 platforms named MobileHelp in the ranking stage, which limits the statistical significance of the average rank of 2.0.
  • No personal testing: This review does not include hands-on testing of MobileHelp devices or independent signal measurements at rural properties.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Landline Medical Alert System with Industry's Longest Range | 600 ft - MobileHelp: https://www.mobilehelp.com/landline-medical-alert-system-600ft-range
  • Classic Cellular Medical Alert System | No Landline | MobileHelp: https://www.mobilehelp.com/products/in-home-medical-alert-system
  • Landline Medical Alert System with Industry's Longest Range: https://www.mobilehelp.com/products/mobilehelp-wired-home
  • Additional AI research evidence132 records
    1. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    2. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    8. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    10. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    11. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    12. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    14. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    17. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    19. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    22. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    25. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    31. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    32. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    36. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    38. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    39. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    54. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    58. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    63. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    78. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    79. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    81. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    82. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    88. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    91. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    94. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    103. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    107. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    108. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    110. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    111. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    113. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    116. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    117. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    118. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    119. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    121. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    122. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    123. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    124. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    125. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    126. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    127. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    128. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    129. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    130. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    131. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    132. AI research evidence record openai:c8

Independent Sources

  • MobileHelp Medical Alert System Review 2025 - AgingInPlace.org: https://aginginplace.org/mobilehelp-medical-alert-system-review/
  • AT&T vs. Verizon: Coverage, Speed, & Reliability Compared: https://gojimobile.com/blog/att-vs-verizon
  • Search results provided for unrelated suitability-assessment and ServiceNow pages: https://handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/COBS/9A/2.html
  • MobileHelp Classic Cellular Review: Industry-Best Range and Exceptional Value: https://medgrade.com/reviews/mobilehelp-classic-cellular/
  • MobileHelp Solo Review: Transparent Value in Mobile Safety - MedGrade: https://medgrade.com/reviews/mobilehelp-solo/
  • MobileHelp Solo – MedGrade: https://medgrade.org/devices/mobilehelp-solo/
  • MobileHelp Solo Medical Alert System for Home and Away - Advanced Security LLC: https://www.advancedsecurity.us/product/mobilehelp-solo-medical-alert-system/
  • MobileHelp Reviews on ConsumerAffairs: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/medical/mobilehelp.html
  • AT&T vs T-Mobile vs Verizon Signal: Who Has the Best Coverage in 2026?: https://www.hiboost.com/blogs/news/at-t-vs-t-mobile-vs-verizon-signal-who-has-the-best-coverage-in-2025
  • MobileHelp Review: Good System Overall, But With 2 Negatives: https://www.medicalalertbuyersguide.org/medical-alert-system/mobilehelp-review/
  • MobileHelp Review in 2026: Is It a Good Value? - The National Council on Aging (NCOA): https://www.ncoa.org/adviser/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp-review/
  • MobileHelp Solo Review - PCMag: https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/mobilehelp-solo
  • T-Mobile Coverage in Rural Areas: Where It Holds Up and Where You'll Lose Bars: https://www.really.com/post/t-mobile-coverage-in-rural-areas-where-it-holds-up-and-where-youll-lose-bars
  • MobileHelp Review 2026: Features, Pricing, and Comparison: https://www.retirementliving.com/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp-review
  • MobileHelp Cost, Pricing, Packages & Monthly Plans: https://www.safehome.org/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp/
  • Best Medical Alert Systems for Seniors with Fall Detection: https://www.safewise.com/senior-safety/medical-alerts/mobile-help/
  • MobileHelp Medical Alert System Cost & Pricing in 2026: https://www.seniorliving.org/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp/
  • MobileHelp Medical Review, Hands-On Test (2026): https://www.theseniorlist.com/medical-alert-systems/mobilehelp/reviews/
  • Additional AI research evidence132 records
    1. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    2. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    8. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    10. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    11. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    12. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    14. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    17. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    19. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    20. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    22. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    25. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    31. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    32. AI research evidence record grok:c1
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    36. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    38. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    39. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    54. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    58. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    63. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:c22
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c24
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    78. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    79. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    81. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    82. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    88. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    91. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    94. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    103. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    107. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    108. AI research evidence record google:1.3.3
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    110. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    111. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    113. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    116. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    117. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    118. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    119. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    121. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    122. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    123. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    124. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    125. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    126. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    127. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    128. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    129. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    130. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    131. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    132. AI research evidence record openai:c8

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 10, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
33
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#3

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

22 independent · 11 company-owned

Evidence support

28 direct · 5 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 8ab4848917da56c2c30724c90ad932bd6d886ce95a6ba849ee7d68cbfde3693c