AI Consensus Fit Review

Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift Review for Narrow Stairs

The Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift is an uncertain fit for a perching seat on tight staircases.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
AI Consensus Fit Review research report illustration
Independent AI consensus researchWe compare multiple AI platforms to surface agreement, disagreement, and buyer-specific tradeoffs.

Answer Capsule

The Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift is an uncertain fit for a perching seat on tight staircases. Only 2 of 7 platforms named it during the ranking stage, and no reviewed source confirms that Bruno sells a perch-seat configuration for the Elan or the legacy SRE-1550. The strongest reason to consider it is the standard Elan's genuinely narrow profile: a vertical rail that mounts within about 5 inches of the wall and a folded width reported between roughly 11.25 and 12.5 inches. The main limitation is that every perch-specific specification — seat angle, minimum width with a perch seat, knee clearance, and perch folded footprint — remains unverified. Treat it as a conventional seated narrow-stair lift until a dealer confirms otherwise.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 platforms (deepseek, kimi)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank3.5
Best listed rank3
Relevant product/model/planBruno Elan straight indoor stairlift; proposed SRE-1550 perch-seat configuration unverified
Overall use-case fitUncertain — strong narrow-stair profile, unverified perch seat
Research date2026-09-27

Why Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift a good choice for a perching seat on tight staircases?
  • Why did only some AI platforms rank Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift for narrow-stair perching seats?

Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift qualified because it cleared the study's minimum-mention threshold, not because the evidence confirmed a perch product. Two of the seven included platforms — deepseek and kimi — named the entity during ranking discovery, meeting the two-mention minimum. Its average listed rank was 3.5, with a best rank of 3 (deepseek) and a rank of 4 (kimi).

The entity also qualified on brand and category grounds. Bruno is a long-established stairlift manufacturer with an official product presence and a dealer-based consultation model [1]. The Elan is independently recognized as one of the two best stairlifts for narrow straight staircases, alongside the Harmar SL600 [2]. That narrow-stair reputation is what pulled the entity into a perch-seat study even though the perch element itself is unproven.

The qualification is therefore conditional. The entity entered the study as a narrow-stair candidate with a proposed perch-seat configuration, and the reviewed evidence does not establish that the perch configuration exists as a current Bruno product [3]. This review evaluates it only for the perching-seat-on-tight-staircases use case.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Perching Seat for Tight Staircases

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Bruno Elan model is actually relevant to a perching seat for tight staircases?
  • Is the Bruno SRE-1550 perch seat configuration a current product a buyer can order?

The relevant product is the Bruno Elan straight indoor stairlift, and the perch-seat variant is not verified. Platforms described the candidate inconsistently. Most listed "Bruno Elan Straight Stairlift with Perch Seat" and "Bruno SRE-1550 with optional perch seat configuration." Google instead described the "Bruno Elan Straight Stairlift (SRE-3050) with customizable posture configurations." OpenAI stated plainly that the proposed SRE-1550 perch-seat configuration could not be verified as a current Bruno product.

The model-number confusion matters. SRE-1550 is the legacy Electra-Ride II, documented with a conventional swiveling seat and a seat-position safety interlock rather than a perch seat [5]. SRE-3050 is the current Elan line [6]. Perplexity's SRE-1550 manual excerpt shows swivel positions and a 350-pound capacity [8], while Bruno identifies the Elan at 300 pounds [9]. These are different machines with different specifications.

For a buyer, the practical takeaway is that the perch-seat Elan is a proposed configuration, not a documented catalog item. The standard Elan is the product that can actually be specified today, and it is a seated lift. Any perch claim must be confirmed in writing by an authorized Bruno dealer before it is treated as real.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree the Bruno Elan does well on narrow staircases?
  • Does the Bruno Elan have a documented minimum staircase width for tight stairs?

The platforms agreed on the Elan's narrow-stair physical profile and on the absence of perch documentation. Agreement was strong on the hardware and unanimous on the perch gap.

On the rail and footprint, multiple platforms converged. Bruno states the Elan uses a vertical, low-profile rail installed close to the wall to maximize open space on the steps [10]. Independent and dealer sources put the rail within about 5 inches of the wall [11]. Folded width was reported at approximately 12 inches by several sources [12], 11.25 inches by one (grok:0), and 12.5 inches by another [16]. The seat, arms, and footrest fold when not in use, and a manual or power folding rail can clear the lower landing [10].

On minimum staircase width, the platforms broadly agreed the Elan targets the high-20s to 30-inch range, though figures varied: 28–30 inches [18], 28 inches [15], 26 inches (grok:0), and 30 inches [16]. No platform located a current official Bruno minimum-width specification for the Elan [10].

On the perch gap, the platforms agreed by omission. No reviewed source — company-owned or independent — documents a Bruno perch seat, perch angle, or perch knee clearance. That is a shared finding, not proof the product does not exist.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Did the AI platforms disagree about whether Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift exists?
  • How much does the Bruno Elan cost, and why do the price estimates conflict?

The platforms disagreed on fit rating, on whether a perch option exists at all, and on price. These are material conflicts, not rounding differences.

Fit ratings split across the seven platforms: grok rated the fit "good," while anthropic, kimi, and openai rated it "uncertain," and deepseek, google, and perplexity rated it "mixed." No platform rated it a strong or confirmed fit for the perch use case.

On product existence, the split is sharper. Grok reported an optional perch seat configuration available on Elan/Elite models per dealer listings (grok:4). Deepseek said Bruno markets a perching seat option, matching the core perch need [19]. Kimi found the opposite: no source confirms Bruno offers a perch seat, and Bruno was absent from the competitive perch set that includes Handicare, Companion, Stannah, and Leodis [20]. Google concluded Bruno does not manufacture a dedicated OEM perch seat for the Elan, directing perch buyers to Stannah or Handicare instead [22].

On price, estimates conflict. One 2026 review put the Elan straight installed at roughly $3,500–$5,500 [24]. Broader Bruno reviews cited starting prices around $3,000–$11,000 depending on model and configuration [25]. Google reported a base unit of $2,900–$5,000 with itemized options [26]. Bruno itself publishes no list price and states that straight stairlift pricing depends on model, installation, options, and site requirements [27].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What narrow-stair features does the Bruno Elan offer for a perching seat buyer?
  • Does the Bruno Elan have a documented perch seat angle or knee clearance?

The Elan's documented strengths are narrow-stair clearance and standard seated safety, not perching geometry. The perch-specific capabilities are undocumented.

Rail and footprint. The vertical rail mounts within about 5 inches of the wall [29]. An older Elan specification identifies a rail approximately 2 inches wide installed to within about 3 inches of the wall, but current dimensions should be confirmed [31]. Folded width is reported between roughly 11.25 and 12.5 inches [30].

Seating geometry. The standard Elan seat pad measures 15.75 inches wide by 16.75 inches deep, with 20.25 inches between the arms [29]. Armrests, seat, and footrest fold. The standard configuration requires a conventional seated posture with a roughly 90-degree knee bend [29]. No perch seat angle, perch seat height, or perch knee-clearance measurement was found in any reviewed source [34].

Swivel and parking. The seat swivels and locks at 0, 67, and 90 degrees at the top landing, with power swivel optional [34]. Independent SRE-1550 documentation shows swivel positions at 0, 45, and 90 degrees [36], but those sources do not tie the feature to a perch-seat version.

Safety. The Elan includes obstruction sensors in the footrest and seat carriage, a retractable seat-positioning belt, carriage safety switches, end-stop bumpers, limit switches, and overspeed protection, and meets ANSI/ASME A18.1 [34]. These support seated operation; they do not establish that a perch configuration is available or appropriate.

Installation. Bruno sells and installs through factory-trained dealers, anchoring the rail to stair treads and following factory clearances [34]. Battery-powered 24VDC operation with continuous charging along the rail avoids a dedicated outlet [38].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift cost, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
  • What warranty and ongoing costs apply to a Bruno Elan perch configuration?

No verified price exists for a Bruno Elan perch configuration, and public Elan pricing conflicts. Bruno publishes no list price and states that straight stairlift pricing depends on model, installation, options, and site requirements, with a dealer quote required [40]. Independent estimates for the standard Elan straight lift range from roughly $2,900–$5,000 for the base unit [42] to about $3,500–$5,500 installed [43], with broader Bruno ranges of $3,000–$11,000 [44].

Optional items carry separate costs. Google reported a power folding rail at about $1,695, a power swivel seat at about $950, and a power folding footrest at about $880, plus possible permit fees and step modifications from $295 to $395 [42]. Bruno lists power swivel, power footrest, and manual or power folding rail as optional-cost items [45].

Warranty terms are reported but should be confirmed in writing. Bruno states indoor straight stairlifts carry a limited lifetime warranty on major components, with a 2-year parts warranty and 30-day labor coverage after installation [45]. Whether a perch seat, if it existed, would fall under the same terms is unverified.

Contract, cancellation, deposit, financing, removal, and service terms were not found in the reviewed sources and are dealer-specific [45]. Potential ongoing costs include battery replacement, service, and maintenance [45]. No verified perch-specific pricing, fees, or cancellation terms can be stated.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is the Bruno Elan best suited for on a narrow straight staircase?
  • Is Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift worth it for a buyer who can use a standard seated lift?

The Bruno Elan is best suited to buyers with straight, narrow staircases who can use a conventional seated lift and want a compact parked footprint. It is not best suited to buyers who specifically need a perching posture.

It fits homeowners with straight staircases in roughly the 28–30 inch range who need a space-saving design [48]. It fits families who need to keep using the stairs when the lift is parked, because the folded profile is reported around 12 inches [50]. It fits buyers who want dealer-installed equipment with swivel-seat and obstruction-sensor features [52]. It fits buyers prioritizing a slim rail profile and standard straight-stairlift installation [49]. It also fits buyers who value a limited lifetime warranty on major components [53].

For the perch use case specifically, the fit is conditional: the Elan suits a narrow staircase only if the buyer can use the standard seat and the dealer confirms actual stair width and clearance [52].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift for a perching seat on tight staircases?
  • Is Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift unsuitable for staircases narrower than 28 inches?

Buyers who specifically require a true perch or semi-standing seat should not choose the Bruno Elan on current evidence. No reviewed source confirms a Bruno perch seat, perch angle, or perch knee clearance [54].

It is also not best suited to very Narrow Stairs where the standard Elan seat, armrests, footrest, or rider knee position still obstruct passage [54]. The standard Elan requires a roughly 90-degree knee bend and has fixed armrest spacing, which may limit fit in a particularly tight staircase or for a rider needing a more upright posture [54]. It is not suited to staircases narrower than 28 inches unless a specialized assessment determines fit [57]. It is not suited to curved, winder, or multi-landing staircases, because the Elan is straight-rail only [57]. It is not suited to buyers who need published minimum-width, folded-footprint, or perch-angle specifications before committing [59]. It is not suited to buyers who need transparent online pricing or fixed national installation terms [61].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift for a buyer who needs a documented perch seat?
  • When should a buyer choose a curved stairlift or platform lift instead of Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift?

Another option may be better whenever the buyer's primary requirement is a documented perch seat. Purpose-built perch models with published specifications exist from other manufacturers, including Handicare, Companion, Stannah, and Leodis [63]. Acorn lists a "Stairlift Perch" option as a documented alternative in the category [67]. Google specifically recommended the Stannah Sadler or Handicare 1000 with Perch Seat for buyers who require a semi-standing posture [68].

A curved stairlift may be better when landings, turns, or parking geometry — not merely stair width — create the main clearance problem [70]. The Elan is straight-rail only; curved or multi-landing staircases require a curved model such as the Bruno Elite Curved [71]. A platform lift or other home-access solution may be better when the staircase is too narrow for any safe stairlift installation [70]. A conventional seated stairlift may be better when the user has limited standing balance or cannot bear full weight throughout the journey, since a perch posture is not appropriate for every user [63].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift before signing a contract?
  • Which measurements and warranty terms must a Bruno dealer confirm in writing?

Before buying, a buyer should confirm the following with an authorized Bruno dealer, in writing:

  • Does Bruno currently offer a genuine perch or semi-standing seat for the Elan, and what is its exact model number [74]?
  • Is the proposed SRE-1550 configuration current, supported, and compatible with a perch seat [76]?
  • What is the measured minimum stair width for this exact seat, armrest, footrest, and rail configuration [74]?
  • What are the loaded and folded dimensions, including rider knee clearance and remaining passage width [74]?
  • What is the perch-seat angle, seat height, transfer method, and allowable user posture [74]?
  • Does the seat swivel and lock at 67, 90, or other angles, and is power swivel available for this configuration [74]?
  • Where can the lift park, and is a manual or power folding rail required at the lower landing [74]?
  • What stair-tread, wall, door, handrail, and landing clearances are required [74]?
  • What are the installed price, optional-item fees, warranty terms, labor coverage, maintenance costs, battery-replacement costs, and cancellation terms [74]?
  • Will the dealer provide a written site measurement and demonstrate the exact configuration on a staircase with comparable width [74]?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The AI consensus is mixed-to-uncertain, and the uncertainty is about the product, not just the fit. Two of seven platforms named Bruno Elan Perch Stairlift during ranking, with an average rank of 3.5. Fit ratings split across the seven platforms: one "good," three "uncertain," and three "mixed." No platform confirmed a current Bruno perch seat.

The standard Elan is a credible narrow-stair lift. Its rail mounts within about 5 inches of the wall, its folded width is reported between roughly 11.25 and 12.5 inches, and it carries obstruction sensors, a seat belt, swivel-seat options, and a limited lifetime warranty on major components [83]. Those are real advantages for a tight staircase.

But the perch element is unverified. No reviewed source documents a Bruno perch seat, perch angle, minimum width with a perch seat, or perch knee clearance. Buyers who need a perching posture should treat the Bruno Elan as a conventional seated narrow-stair candidate only after an authorized dealer confirms the exact seat type, stair width, folded footprint, knee clearance, and installation layout [83]. Buyers who require a documented perch seat should compare against manufacturers with published perch specifications [86].

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a fixed set of platform fit-research responses collected for the topic "Best Perch Stairlifts for Narrow Stairs," use case "Perching Seat for Tight Staircases," for the United States market. Seven platforms contributed fit research: openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, and google. Each platform returned a fit rating, use-case findings, pricing and terms, limitations, and questions to verify before buying.

The study used the run research date of 2026-09-27 as the study date. Ranking-stage mentions were counted only from platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. All included platforms evaluated fit, but platform mentions count only the platforms that named the entity during ranking. The entity cleared the two-mention minimum with mentions from deepseek and kimi.

The review is part of the broader Perching Seat for Tight Staircases consensus index, which compares multiple entities for the same use case. It also sits within the stairlifts category directory.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts, and the supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts; deepseek ran with search disabled, so its claims are platform-reported.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Anthropic reported 2026-01-15 and deepseek reported 2026-06-12, while the remaining platforms reported 2026-09-27. These dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The reviewed sources do not resolve the core product question. No source confirms that Bruno sells a perch-seat configuration for the Elan or the SRE-1550, and no source provides a perch-seat angle, minimum width with a perch seat, or knee-clearance measurement. Third-party sources publish dimensional and pricing details for different Elan generations and configurations, and those figures should not be treated as current specifications without dealer confirmation. Public pricing conflicts across sources, and no verified perch-specific pricing, fees, or cancellation terms were found. Agreement among AI platforms does not prove product quality; it reflects the sources those platforms retrieved. Missing research was not treated as disagreement.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Stairlift Perch | Acorn Stairlifts: https://www.acornstairlifts.com/stairlift-perch
  • Bruno | Stairlifts, Wheelchair Lifts & Home Accessibility: https://www.bruno.com
  • Bruno® Stairlifts | Made in USA: https://www.bruno.com/stairlifts
  • Stair Lift Cost (2026) | Bruno® - Made in USA: https://www.bruno.com/stairlifts/cost
  • Perch and Stand On Stair Lifts | Companion Stairlifts: https://www.companionstairlifts.co.uk/stairlifts/perch-seat
  • Additional AI research evidence87 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    8. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    13. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    19. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    21. AI research evidence record kimi:c8
    22. AI research evidence record google:1.4.1
    23. AI research evidence record google:2.2.3
    24. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    26. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    28. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    36. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    37. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    42. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    44. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    47. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    49. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    56. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    59. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    61. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    63. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    64. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    65. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    66. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    67. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.4.1
    69. AI research evidence record google:2.2.3
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    72. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    78. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    81. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    82. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    87. AI research evidence record google:1.4.1

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence87 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    8. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    13. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    19. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    21. AI research evidence record kimi:c8
    22. AI research evidence record google:1.4.1
    23. AI research evidence record google:2.2.3
    24. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    26. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    28. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.3.1
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    36. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    37. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    42. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    44. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    47. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    49. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    56. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    59. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    61. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    63. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    64. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    65. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    66. AI research evidence record kimi:c5
    67. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.4.1
    69. AI research evidence record google:2.2.3
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    72. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    78. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    81. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    82. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    87. AI research evidence record google:1.4.1

Verify This Research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
September 27, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
42
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#4

Research trail and source mix

Configured platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

26 independent · 13 company-owned · 3 unclear

Evidence support

28 direct · 14 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 2c5ffbd5030e70f91e97b50ed3b1fb0f8aff3b7f0e4b5eae4a957e8111da2470