AI Consensus Fit Review

Phonak for Seniors With Hearing Loss - AI Consensus Fit Review

Phonak is a strong fit for older adults seeking prescription-grade hearing support, particularly when speech clarity in background noise is the top priority.

Situation-specific fit reviewA focused review of how this provider fits the needs addressed by this research category.
Built for careful comparisonSee the strengths, limitations, pricing considerations, and questions worth investigating before you decide.
Phonak for Seniors With Hearing Loss hero image
senior-technologyPublished by Aging in Place Index to support informed aging-in-place decisions.

Answer Capsule

Phonak is a strong fit for older adults seeking prescription-grade hearing support, particularly when speech clarity in background noise is the top priority. Four of seven AI platforms named Phonak during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 1.75 and a best rank of 1. The strongest reason to consider Phonak is the Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere's dedicated DEEPSONIC AI chip, which independent lab testing ranked in the top 3% for speech-in-noise performance. The main limitation is pricing opacity: no manufacturer-direct U.S. retail price exists, and trial, warranty, and return terms vary by provider rather than being standardized nationally. Phonak requires professional fitting and is not an OTC option, making it a weaker fit for budget-conscious buyers or those seeking self-directed purchase.

Research Snapshot

MetricValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage4 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, openai)
Share of included platform responses57.1% (4 of 7)
Average listed rank1.75
Best listed rank1 (anthropic, deepseek, google)
Relevant product/model/planPhonak Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere (i90/i70), prescription RIC
Overall use-case fitStrong (4 platforms), Good (2 platforms), Uncertain (1 platform)
Research date2026-08-13

Why Phonak Qualified for This Study

Phonak qualified because it was named by at least two AI platforms during the ranking stage for the "Best Hearing Aids for Seniors" topic. Four platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, openai) explicitly named Phonak in their rankings, exceeding the minimum mention threshold. The entity was evaluated against category criteria including speech clarity, background-noise reduction, audiology support, comfort and fit, trial period, warranty, pricing transparency, and customer support quality (topic configuration).

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to General Hearing Support

The most relevant product is the Phonak Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere, a prescription rechargeable receiver-in-canal (RIC) hearing aid available at the 90 or 70 technology level, fitted and supported through an authorized U.S. hearing-care professional [1]. The Audéo Lumity L90 Life with Tinnitus Balance is also relevant where tinnitus support matters, though it is an earlier platform [3].

A free firmware update in late 2025 transitioned branding from "Audéo Sphere Infinio" to "Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere," causing naming confusion across retail portals [2]. Buyers should confirm which generation and technology level is quoted.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Speech clarity in background noise is Phonak's standout strength. This was the most consistent finding across platforms. Phonak states that Audéo Sphere Infinio uses Spheric Speech Clarity and a dedicated DEEPSONIC deep-neural-network chip to separate speech from background noise from multiple directions [5]. Independent lab testing by HearAdvisor gave the Sphere Infinio 90 an A grade with SoundScore 4.6/5, ranking it #2 among 36 tested prescription hearing aids (top 3%), with speech-in-noise scoring 3.05 points above category average [7]. Phonak reports up to a 10 dB signal-to-noise improvement, though this is a company claim [9].

Professional fitting is mandatory and central to the value proposition. All platforms agreed that Phonak devices are prescription-only, requiring fitting by a licensed hearing-care professional [10]. The FDA distinguishes prescription hearing aids from OTC devices, noting professional programming can accommodate a broader range of hearing loss [11]. Real Ear Measurement and audiologist-driven fitting protocols are standard [13].

Pricing is not transparent at the manufacturer level. Phonak states that hearing-aid prices vary by style, features, and provider and does not publish a standard consumer price [14]. No platform verified a manufacturer-direct U.S. retail price. Reported ranges span $2,498–$4,898 per pair through discount networks to $8,795 per pair at traditional clinics [15].

Trial and warranty terms are provider-dependent, not standardized. Phonak directs buyers to ask the hearing-care professional whether a trial period is offered [14]. The FDA advises consumers to check the specific trial or adjustment period and refund conditions [18]. Reported trials range from 30 to 60 days depending on provider [19].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Fit rating varied from "strong" to "uncertain." Four platforms rated Phonak a strong fit (google, grok, kimi, openai), two rated it good (anthropic, deepseek), and one rated it uncertain (perplexity). Perplexity's uncertainty stemmed from an inability to verify U.S.-specific pricing, warranty, trial terms, or independent performance comparisons from the provided sources [21].

Battery life claims conflicted. Google reported that continuous AI Spheric Speech mode shortens battery life to approximately 10–11 hours, compared to up to 56 hours in standard modes [22]. Anthropic reported up to 31 hours per charge for Infinio and 24 hours for Lumity L90-R [23]. These figures may reflect different testing conditions or firmware versions.

Auracast and Bluetooth LE Audio support was disputed. Anthropic reported that as of mid-2026, Infinio models lack Auracast and Bluetooth LE Audio support [25]. Kimi stated that "Auracast readiness is increasingly standard" in Phonak devices [26]. Buyers should verify current firmware capabilities.

The 10 dB SNR improvement claim was treated differently. OpenAI and Anthropic both reported the claim but noted it is company-sponsored and may not predict every user's experience [27]. Deepseek reported a "up to 50% better speech understanding in noise" claim versus the previous Lumity platform, also company-generated [29].

Physical size was a point of contention. Google noted the RIC body is noticeably larger than previous generations to accommodate the DEEPSONIC chip, which can feel bulky or interfere with glasses [30]. Anthropic reported audiologist feedback of excellent comfort and non-slip fit, while acknowledging some users report larger size [32].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Speech Clarity and Background-Noise Reduction (Advantage)

The Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere uses a dual-chip system with the ERA processor and a dedicated DEEPSONIC Deep Neural Network chip for real-time speech separation [33]. The U.S. feature summary lists Spheric Speech Clarity at full strength for the 90 Sphere level and medium strength for the 70 Sphere level [34]. A peer-reviewed study reported reduced cognitive load and listening effort in noisy environments [35]. Independent reviewers note superior noise suppression compared to competitors, though some users report noise suppression could be stronger in extreme cases [36].

Audiology Support and Professional Fitting (Advantage)

Phonak requires prescription fitting by a licensed hearing-care professional via in-person appointment or remote fitting through authorized retailers [37]. All models use audiologist-driven fitting protocols with Real Ear Measurement [38]. Remote adjustments are available via the myPhonak app when the provider supports this feature [39]. However, technical support cannot assist with internal settings or fitting-specific questions; the primary support role belongs to the hearing-care provider [40].

Comfort, Fit, and Daily Use (Advantage with Caveats)

Audéo Infinio Sphere is a rechargeable RIC design intended for mild-to-profound hearing loss [41]. Features include IP68 water and dust resistance, EasyGuard domes to reduce earwax-related repairs, and multiple receiver options [42]. Individual comfort depends on ear anatomy, receiver choice, and fitting quality [44]. The larger physical footprint may interfere with glasses [45].

Connectivity and Streaming (Advantage)

Phonak offers universal Bluetooth streaming on iPhone and Android with hands-free calling, supporting up to 8 paired devices with 2 active simultaneously [46]. Streaming quality is praised for phone calls, podcasts, and YouTube audio [47]. A separate TV Connector or other accessory may be needed for optimized television streaming [44].

Automatic Adaptation (Advantage)

Phonak Infinio Ultra features AutoSense OS 7.0 offering 24% better automatic adaptation; Lumity uses AutoSense OS 5.0 [49]. Automatic programs classify surroundings and shift microphone and noise settings without constant manual input [50]. Binaural VoiceStream Technology enables synchronized volume and program control between both hearing aids [51].

Tinnitus Support (Unclear)

Phonak's Infinio feature summary lists Tinnitus Balance, and the Audéo Lumity L90 Life specifically includes this feature [34]. Effectiveness is not independently verified; buyers should confirm whether the feature is enabled and clinically appropriate [52].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

No manufacturer-direct U.S. retail price was verified for Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere. Phonak states that prices vary and advises buyers to ask providers about trial periods [53]. The following figures are reported benchmarks, not guaranteed 2026 quotes:

Price PointAmountSource
2025 Sonova minimum advertised price, Audéo I90 Sphere~$4,899 per pair[54]
2025 Sonova minimum advertised price, Audéo I70 Sphere~$3,577 per pair[54]
Audéo Infinio range (four technology levels)$2,498–$4,598 per pair[55]
Audéo Sphere Infinio Ultra (discount network)$4,898 per pair[55]
Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere I70 (lowest tier)$3,598 per pair[56]
Traditional clinic pricing, premium optionsUp to $8,795 per pair[57]
Typical prescription bundled range$2,500–$6,000 per pair[58]
Estimated dealer-dependent range$3,000–$6,000+ per pair[59]

Additional fees may include: nonrefundable professional fitting fees (even on returns), extended warranty coverage, replacement chargers, custom earmolds, accessory microphones, remote fitting fees, and follow-up clinic visits costing $65–$95 per appointment once the introductory service contract expires [60].

Contract and cancellation terms: Trial periods vary by provider, typically 30–60 days, with nonrefundable fitting fees commonly applied on returns [62]. Manufacturer warranties typically run 1–3 years covering repairs and loss/damage with deductible; some providers offer 4-year extended warranties [63]. No recurring Phonak subscription fee for the hearing aid itself was verified [64].

Warranty service speed: Same-day receiver replacement, nonfunctioning receiver replacement within 3 business days, cracked case within 5 business days [65]. Out-of-warranty repairs may incur freight and handling charges [64].

Best Suited For

  • Seniors with moderate-to-profound hearing loss requiring prescription fitting [66]
  • Users who frequently converse in restaurants, family gatherings, and other noisy public settings [68]
  • Those who want rechargeable RIC devices with broad wireless connectivity [70]
  • Buyers willing to use an audiologist or other licensed hearing-care professional [72]
  • Users who value brand reputation, clinical evidence, and professional support over cost [68]
  • Individuals with active lifestyles who value IP68 water resistance and all-day battery life [70]

Probably Not Best Suited For

  • Adults with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss seeking an OTC device without professional involvement [74]
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking clearly published manufacturer-direct pricing [76]
  • Those who want nationally uniform return, warranty, service, or financing terms [78]
  • Seniors who prefer disposable-battery models exclusively [80]
  • Users seeking a highly discreet or virtually invisible style [81]
  • Those needing CROS configuration or built-in telecoils in the Sphere model [82]
  • Homebound or rural individuals without nearby Phonak providers [83]

When Another Option May Be Better

  • OTC hearing aids ($500–$1,500) may suffice for mild hearing loss used mainly for TV and family dinners [84]
  • Costco's Kirkland Signature or Jabra Enhance offer lower costs through their hearing centers [85]
  • Oticon Intent or newer models support Auracast and Bluetooth LE Audio now, which Infinio lacks as of mid-2026 [86]
  • Oticon, Starkey, or Signia may offer better ITE selection for those preferring custom in-the-ear devices [87]
  • Online retailers (Injoy, Direct Hearing, ZipHearing) offer broader geographic reach for rural buyers [88]
  • ReSound or Oticon waterproof models are rated higher for submersion; Phonak IP68 is resistant but not designed for swimming [87]

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  1. Is the quoted device specifically Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere, Audéo Sphere Infinio, or non-Sphere Audéo Infinio, and is it the 90 or 70 technology level? [90]
  2. What is the complete out-the-door price for one device and for a pair, including fitting, follow-up visits, charger, accessories, taxes, and service? [91]
  3. How many days is the written trial period, what is refundable, and are there restocking or fitting charges? [92]
  4. What exactly does the written warranty cover, for how long, and what are the loss-and-damage deductible and exclusions? [94]
  5. How many follow-up programming and clean-and-check visits are included, and what do later visits cost? [96]
  6. Will the devices be verified with real-ear measurements and programmed for the buyer's actual audiogram? [97]
  7. Is the buyer's smartphone, television, and preferred streaming equipment compatible? [98]
  8. Would the 70 level provide adequate performance for the buyer's typical restaurants, meetings, and public settings, or is the 90 level clinically justified? [90]
  9. Are Tinnitus Balance, Roger compatibility, TV Connector support, and other requested features included or extra? [90]
  10. What happens if the local provider closes, stops servicing Phonak, or the buyer moves to another state? [99]
  11. Does the provider support remote fitting and myPhonak app-based adjustments, or is all adjustment in-office only? [100]
  12. What is the charging time from empty to full, and how does battery life degrade over the device lifespan? [101]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Phonak is a strong fit for General Hearing Support when the senior needs prescription-level customization and places high value on speech clarity in background noise, professional fitting, and connectivity. The Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere is most compelling for challenging group conversations and public settings, with independent lab testing ranking it in the top 3% for speech-in-noise performance [102]. The main buyer risks are high and poorly standardized pricing, dependence on provider quality, and unclear trial and warranty terms; these should be resolved in a written quote before purchase [103]. For budget-constrained seniors or those with simple mild-to-moderate loss, OTC alternatives may offer sufficient value at substantially lower cost [105].

For a broader comparison of hearing aid options for this use case, see the General Hearing Support consensus index.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, perplexity) that evaluated Phonak against category criteria for the "Best Hearing Aids for Seniors" topic. Each platform provided entity fit assessments, use-case findings, pricing information, and citation-linked evidence. The authoritative research date is 2026-08-13. Platform-reported research dates differ: deepseek reported 2026-04-07, while all other platforms reported 2026-08-13; this discrepancy is disclosed as a methodology limitation.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. All included platforms evaluated fit, but platform_mentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery (4 of 7).

Methodology Limitations

  • No independent verification: The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed.
  • Platform date discrepancies: Deepseek's research date (2026-04-07) differs from the authoritative run date (2026-08-13), meaning some pricing and product information may be stale.
  • Company-sponsored evidence: Several performance claims (10 dB SNR improvement, 50% speech understanding improvement) originate from Phonak and are not independently verified [107].
  • Product naming conflicts: The ranking-stage product names include Audéo Sphere Infinio, Audéo Infinio Ultra Sphere, and Audéo Lumity L90 Life. A late-2025 firmware update transitioned branding, causing naming confusion [109]. The exact generation and technology level should be confirmed with the provider.
  • Pricing conflicts: Reported prices range from $2,498 to $8,795 per pair depending on source and provider model. No manufacturer-direct U.S. retail price was verified.
  • Trial and warranty uncertainty: No standard U.S.-wide Phonak trial period or consumer warranty schedule was verified from the reviewed public sources.
  • Official-site retrieval issues: One or more platform mentions noted the official website (phonak.com/en-in) is India-specific; U.S. product pages and pricing were not always directly accessible.
  • AI agreement does not prove quality: Agreement among AI platforms reflects consistency in their assessments of supplied evidence, not independent proof of product performance.

Explore more senior technology guidance in the category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • hear.com's Hearing Aid Value and Price Guide: How to choose a hearing aid: https://www.hear.com/resources/hearing-aids/guide-to-price-value/
  • Spheric Speech Clarity significantly improves speech understanding in a multi-talker scenario: https://www.phonak.com/content/dam/phonak/en/evidence-library/field-studies/PH_FieldStudyNews_SSCListeningEffort_210x297_EN_028-2783-02.pdf
  • Search results provided in prompt: https://www.phonak.com/en-in
  • Phonak Audéo Sphere Infinio - The Hearing Aid with a Dedicated AI Chip: https://www.phonak.com/en-in/hearing-aids/hearing-aids/audeo-sphere-infinio
  • Infinio Ultra AI-powered, Bluetooth hearing aids: https://www.phonak.com/en-us
  • Find a Hearing Care Specialist | Phonak: https://www.phonak.com/en-us/find-a-provider
  • AI Noise Cancelling Hearing Aid - Phonak Audéo Sphere Infinio: https://www.phonak.com/en-us/hearing-devices/hearing-aids-for-veterans/audeo-sphere
  • Phonak Audéo Sphere™: AI Hearing Aid for Speech in Noise: https://www.phonak.com/en-us/hearing-devices/hearing-aids/audeo-sphere
  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record google:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c28
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    17. AI research evidence record google:c1
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    20. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    21. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    22. AI research evidence record google:c4
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c29
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c30
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    26. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record google:c2
    31. AI research evidence record google:c6
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    33. AI research evidence record google:c2
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record google:c6
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    48. AI research evidence record google:c5
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c27
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c28
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    56. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    58. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    59. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    61. AI research evidence record google:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    67. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    69. AI research evidence record google:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    71. AI research evidence record google:c5
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    75. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    81. AI research evidence record google:c2
    82. AI research evidence record google:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    85. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    89. AI research evidence record google:c1
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    96. AI research evidence record google:c1
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c29
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    105. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    108. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    109. AI research evidence record google:c1

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record google:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c28
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    17. AI research evidence record google:c1
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    20. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    21. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    22. AI research evidence record google:c4
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:c29
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c30
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    26. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    30. AI research evidence record google:c2
    31. AI research evidence record google:c6
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    33. AI research evidence record google:c2
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c23
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record google:c6
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c21
    48. AI research evidence record google:c5
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:c25
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:c26
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c27
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c28
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    56. AI research evidence record grok:c3
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c18
    58. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    59. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    61. AI research evidence record google:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    67. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    69. AI research evidence record google:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    71. AI research evidence record google:c5
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    75. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    81. AI research evidence record google:c2
    82. AI research evidence record google:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    85. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c20
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    89. AI research evidence record google:c1
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    96. AI research evidence record google:c1
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    98. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c29
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    105. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    108. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    109. AI research evidence record google:c1

Verify this research

Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.

Study date
Aug 13, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
44
Ranking mentions
4 of 7
Platform share
57%
Final consensus rank
#2

Research trail and source mix

Platforms

openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google

Source mix

30 independent · 13 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

30 direct · 14 partial

Important limitation

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Source snapshot SHA-256 9dcf328e9e648ccaa03b7f48520fbd2a12bb9aeaf83e816129e05fcc367f94cd